- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 04 Dec 2020
Marine energy can be defined as 'energy derived from technologies that utilise seawater as their motive power or harness the water's chemical or heat potential' (IPCC, 2011). Marine energy encompasses a broad range of technology devices that can be broadly categorised as follows:
- Tidal range: Energy extracted from the vertical rise and fall of the tides through entrapment.
- Tidal stream: Energy extracted from currents generated by tides.
- Wave: Energy extracted from the motion of the waves.
- Ocean currents: Energy extracted from wind-driven or thermal ocean current.
- Ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC): Energy derived from temperature differences between the warmer upper ocean layers and colder deeper parts.
- Salinity gradients (osmotic power): Derived from salinity gradients occurring between areas of salt water and fresh water.
The latter three marine energy sources described above are very much at the conceptual or research and development (R&D) stage so this briefing sheet focuses primarily on the first three forms of marine energy.
From a theoretical perspective, both tidal and wave energy devices offer the potential to generate significant amounts of energy. Some estimates indicate that total theoretical available energy from marine sources exceeds all human requirements (IPCC, 2011). In reality a combination of technological and economic challenges means that their deployment on any significant scale remains some way off.
 Tidal range
Although the use of the rise and fall of the tides, resulting from the gravitational pull of the moon (and to a lesser extent the sun), as a potential energy source goes back a long way, with several examples of small tidal mills for grinding corn both in Britain and France during the middle ages, the use of tidal power as a source of electricity is far more recent.
The first major modern tidal power scheme was a 240 MW tidal barrage developed in France on the Rance Estuary in the 1960s. In the UK there have been several large scale proposals, notably the potential Severn Tidal Barrage and more recently the Swansea Tidal Power Lagoon, but to date none of these have been developed.
This form of tidal power relies on the diurnal vertical rise and fall of the tides. Typically a tidal barrage is constructed across the mouth of a river estuary which is used to trap the incoming tide. The most common form of tidal range scheme is referred to as ebb generation. On the incoming (flood) tide the water will pass through sluice gates in the barrage and then, at high water, the sluice gates can be closed trapping the water behind the barrage.
As the tidal waters recede a head of water is developed between the high water level behind the barrage and the lower water level on the downstream side. This head of water can then be used to generate electricity using similar technology (i.e. turbine generators) to low-head hydro schemes.
Other variations of tidal range scheme include flood generation (which uses the incoming tide to generate electricity) as well as two-way generation which generates electricity on both the flood and ebb tides.
For tidal barrage schemes, the average power output is proportional to the area of the retained water and the square of the tidal range. This means that the viability of a potential tidal range scheme is heavily dependent upon the tidal range and local topography.
- Low carbon: Tidal range schemes offer another low carbon form of energy generation.
- Predictability: The tidal range (and thus power output) can be predicted with high degree of certainty years in advance.
- Scale: Individual tidal range schemes, such as the Severn Tidal Barrage, could generate up to 8GW power.
Conversely, the main cons are:
- Demand response: The power from tidal range schemes comes in relatively short bursts at approximately 12hr intervals (which will not always coincide with peak demand).
- Cost: Tidal range power is one of the more expensive forms of energy generation.
- Environmental: Construction of large scale barrage across river estuary has potential for significant effects on local ecosystems.
 Tidal stream
Although tidal range schemes have been around since the mid-20th century, the potential for tidal stream schemes is a more recent phenomenon. Instead of constructing a barrage which relies on the vertical rise and fall of the tides, it is possible to use underwater turbines which convert the kinetic energy from the horizontal flow of the tidal current to electricity.
The potential power output from a tidal current turbine is proportional to the swept area of the blades and the cube of the water velocity. This cube relationship means that the siting of tidal current schemes in areas with high velocity tidal currents is critical to the economic viability of the schemes.
In the UK, which leads the world in terms of tidal current schemes, demonstration projects have been developed near Lynmouth in north Devon, Strangford Narrows in Northern Ireland and Pentland Firth in Scotland.
Tidal current schemes share some of the same pros and cons as tidal range schemes but with the notable exceptions:
- Environmental: Without the requirement to construct a tidal barrage, the potential environmental affects are significantly reduced.
- Scalability: Although the UK has several very promising sites, viable sites are currently restricted to those areas with particularly strong tidal currents which constrains the potential to scale-up the technology.
- Foundation anchoring in areas of high water velocity and seabed transportation.
- High cost of cables (subsea including connections and expensive trenching/protection).
- Potential need for large (economic) arrays to collect energy at offshore transformer stations for HV transmission to shore.
- Requirement for offshore maintenance crews and service bases.
- Specialised installation/maintenance vessels.
- Interaction with marine traffic including fishing (generators and cables).
Globally it is estimated that there are currently over 1,000 wave device patents. A key advantage of wave power generation is that it is considerably predictable with an eight-hour certainty, as once waves have been created, they continue to transmit energy for some time and distance.
The European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) has identified eight groups of wave devices:
- Attenuator: Sits on the water and generates electricity through the movement of two adjacent arms as the waves pass.
- Point absorber: Floats and is connected to a base on the seabed. The motion of the sea makes the float rise and fall which creates electrical power in the base.
- Oscillating wave surge converter: Uses wave motion to generate energy through a moving arm connected to a pivot joint.
- Oscillating water column: An enclosed and partially submerged column of air which is compressed with the rise and fall of the waves. This motion pushes the trapped air through a turbine.
- Overtopping/terminator device: Waves rush into a submerged reservoir which passes through a turbine before being returned to the sea.
- Submerged pressure differential: Situated on the seabed near to shore, creates energy by exploiting the pressure differential resulting from the rising and falling of the sea level.
- Bulge wave: A moored rubber tube. Sea water enters the tube at the head and the is pushed through a turbine at the end where it returns to the sea.
- Rotating mass: Uses the waves 'heaving and swaying' motion to rotate a gyroscope or eccentric weight which in turn is linked to an electricity generator.
In 2015, BVG Associates issued a report on the Wave and Tidal Supply Chain Development Plan. They identified that devices with a proven capability included Aquamarine Power (Oyster), Boosch-Rexroth, Fred Olsen (Bolt Lifesaver), Wello (Penguin) and Pelamis Wave Power. They also identified potential future technology as those by Albatem, AWS Ocean Energy and Seatricity.
- Access to grid (note that bigger waves are found further offshore).
- Availability and access of sites.
- Lack of supply chain.
- Lack of associated infrastructure.
- Uncertain economics.
- Immaturity of technology (lack of standardisation and dominant design).
- Political instability with current Government policies changing (in particular with respect to subsidies).
- Lack of access to capital.
- Lack of skilled workforce.
- Significant competition from other energy generation sources.
- Need of financial support from government to make the technologies commercially viable.
(Image: Nautricity's Contra Rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) turbine)
- European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC): Established in 2003, EMEC provides developers of both wave and tidal energy converters with purpose-built, open-sea testing facilities. Based in Orkney, EMEC provides an ideal testing centre with its excellent oceanic wave regime and strong tidal currents. (Further information available at www.emec.org.uk).
- Wave Hub: Situated in the eastern extremes of the Atlantic Ocean, 16 km off the north coast of Cornwall, Wave Hub provides one of the world's largest and most technologically advanced sites for the testing and development of offshore renewable energy technology. The site has four dedicated test berths with purpose built, pre-installed grid connection for up to 30 MW export capacity. (Further information available at www.wavehub.co.uk).
- Offshore Renewable Energy (ORE) Catapult: The ORE Catapult centre is one of the UK's flagship technology and innovation research centres. The centre hosts open access shallow water testing facilities which provide a controlled salt water environment to trial and demonstrate new and innovative technologies. (Further information available at ore.catapult.org.uk/home).
The test facilities already have planning consent and grid connection in place and therefore provide developers with a relatively straightforward option to test devices onshore and offshore in real ocean conditions.
(Image: Andritz Hydro Hammerfest's turbine, installed at European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) in Orkney)
 Energy statistics – Current status and future projections
As an island nation situated in the north east Atlantic, the UK is subjected to strong wave and tidal regime but also benefits from a relatively shallow continental shelf all of which mean the UK is in an excellent position to capitalise on the potential benefits associated with marine energy. The figure below demonstrates the clear potential within the UK to generate significant proportions of our energy from marine energy.
 Wave and tidal technology commercial status
[Since this research was published, two of the leading wave energy developers (Pelamis and Aquamarine) have gone into administration, illustrating the challenges associated with commercialising wave power devices.]
The UK Government has identified support bands to ensure financial support is provided to incentivise wave and tidal market development. Under the Renewable Obligation (ROC) regime, wave power received the highest level of financial support with five ROCs/MWh (under 30MW) and two ROCs, thereafter. With the change to Contract for Difference (CFD) (under the Electricity Market Reform) the strike price for wave and tidal has been set at £305/MWh.
In a 2010 report, Ernst & Young identified that the cost of wave power could be reduced by a net amount of 70% by 2035 through learning and reducing underlying costs e.g. labour, metal and manufacturing. In their low cost scenario plan, the model illustrates that costs could be as low as £97/MWh by 2035 and £71/MWh by 2050.
The UK Government is attempting to promote wave power developments in the UK through direct and indirect financial support mechanisms for innovation, manufacturing, testing and deployment of equipment.
Marine energy devices offer the potential to generate significant amounts of energy. Both wave and tidal power have a long way to go until full-scale commercialisation is realised, though tidal power is considerably closer to reaching commercial realisation than wave power.
In both instances it is critical that the Government continues to support the development of technology in order for the UK to exploit this extensive and readily available energy source whilst increasing energy security and realising the 2020 and 2050 carbon reduction commitments.
This article was originally published here in June 2016 by ICE. It was written by Charles Jensen.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Or are you capping.
Digital gaming competition for UK students aged 16 to 18.
Heritage protection in England vs Australia.
Three-quarters of fire doors fail inspections
The role of geoparks, biospheres and world heritage sites.
Just one month to go ! Find out more here.
A new gallery for the University of Huddersfield.
What will it take to stop it ?
To celebrate world bee day 2022 !
Not forgetting part F and the new part overheating part O.
As energy prices jump up in cost.
With people in the UK from Ukraine.
Industry leader Steve Murray takes on role.
An abundant and versatile building material.
600,000 heat pump installations targeted per year by 2028.
Helping prevent those unwanted outcomes.
How has transport changed due to Covid-19 ?
Will you need it ? after June 15 and the new Part O ?
Create an account and write the first of many articles.
CIAT commentary after the first meeting.
Who is to blame?
Research recommends focussing on portfolio success rather than project success.