Timber framed buildings and fire
There have been a number of severe fires in timber framed buildings during construction which has put that form of construction under the spotlight for designers whilst carrying out their initial feasibility studies into new projects. The cause of these fires has been noted to be almost always caused by arson and have occurred on timber frame buildings where the structural frame elements have not been protected by the in-service fire protection finishes. Most recently there was a severe fire that destroyed a laboratory building under construction at the University of Nottingham in September 2014. The cause is not known.
A timber frame has panelised structural walls and floors using small section timber studs and board products for the walls. The term does not refer to timber post and beam structures or timber engineered structural frames.
In the timber frame industry, ‘Designer’ is a term that refers to the persons who produce the fabrication drawings. In this article, ‘designer’ is given the definition used by the CDM Regulations, i.e. it is any party which makes decisions regarding the selection, type, layout, compartmentation or other aspect of the timber frame, which may have a bearing on fire safety during construction. These decisions may be made by more than one party and at various stages of the project.
During a designer’s initial risk analysis, fire during construction must be taken into account as an influencing factor in the choice of timber frame system, and as a possible debit compared with the positives that timber provides as a construction method. Those risks will be site specific and so will need to be closely assessed on a project by project basis.
It has long been acknowledged that a timber framed building is safe for service when completed due to the fire protection given to the frame by the boarding and fire stops installed during the construction activities following frame erection. However, some fires have shown that prior to completion, for exposed timber frame elements, there are very real risks, of the highest severity, albeit with a low probability. It is these high severity/low probability risks that specifically require careful management.
In practical terms, HSE now expects:
- An assessment of the particular site and its constraints when the method of construction is being considered.
- For timber framed structures, assessment can be undertaken using Structural Timber Association’s (STA’s) ‘Design guide to separating distances during construction’.
- The assessment should identify that where there is insufficient separation distance to allow a Category A (Standard open panel timber frame) structure, the appropriate level of Category B (Reduced fire spread frames), or C ( Fire spread resistant frames) to match the site constraints (unless an alternative fire engineered solution is developed by a competent person) should be recommended.
- The appropriate category frame should be specified to the manufacturers.
- Timber frame manufacturers, including non-STA members have a significant role to play in ensuring appropriate specification and procurement of frames. Manufacturers should be advising their customers of the guidance and requirements. Use of the STA audit checklist may assist manufacturers in compiling records to demonstrate the steps they have taken to discharge their obligations under CDM Regulation 11 and record who has made specific decisions.
- Any specific information and instructions that must be followed to guarantee the specified category or approved solution to be achieved on site must be passed to the Principal Contractor.
- The Principal Contractor must adhere to the conditions required to achieve the specified category of structure.
The Principal Contractor must devise and apply appropriate fire precautions during the build, including control of hot works, provision of fire warning and extinguishing systems, provision of means of escape and other relevant issues.
 Design actions
Although responsibility for safety on site falls to the contractor, the designer can, and is required to play a role at the design stage. In the course of discharging actions under Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015, Regulation 11 Duties of a principal designer in relation to health and safety at the pre-construction phase, designers should consider the following:
 Eliminating hazards
Consideration must be given to determine whether this is the appropriate form of construction having regard to adjacent buildings, their occupancy, and how they might be affected should a fire occur. This should consider recent experiences in terms of ignition of adjacent property through radiated heat and, as a consequence of the heat, the means of escape from these adjacent structures should the subject building catch fire.
These scenarios are ‘major hazards’ with multiple fatality potential and must receive commensurate consideration. In some cases it may be concluded that an alternative choice of material is necessary.
- Fire engineered solutions must give consideration to the construction phase in addition to the in-use phase. The assumptions should be made known to the contractor since they often only relate to the final condition thereby leaving residual risks during the construction phase.
- Anticipated partial occupancy should be considered to ensure that a sensible construction sequence can be achieved whilst maintaining fire safety. The assumptions should be made known to the contractor.
- In refurbishment projects build sequences, e.g. removal of fire stops and doors may need to be specified in order to maintain a minimum level of fire safety.
- Limitations of the fire service, for example in terms of equipment reach.
- The likelihood of spread of a construction phase fire to adjacent buildings based on recent real fire experiences.
- The use of additional protective measures, e.g. fire retardants, intumescents, fire compartmentation, etc. solely to cater for the build phase.
- Consideration as to the site security that can reasonably be assumed to be in place balanced against the knowledge of the area in which the building is being constructed.
- Checking the design against the STA’s guidance to make sure the advice is not compromised and where possible is assisted.
Specific projects may require other items to be considered. A possible solution might be treating the timber in advance for fire protection. Treatments could have the additional benefit of reducing the potential risks which occur during later modifications.
The suggestions made above should be considered within the framework of ‘eliminating hazards and mitigating any remaining risk’ (i.e. the ERIC approach2 ) [Eliminate, Reduce, Isolate, Control]. There is benefit in discussing this subject overall with the client and HSG 168 gives useful guidance in this respect.
 Passing-on information for the construction process
As in all forms of construction final completion compliance relies on compartmentation and the (varying) fire resisting properties of various walls. It is incumbent on the designers to identify for the contractor any special requirements that a reasonable contractor, experienced in the field of construction being considered, may not be aware of, so that:
- A building can be sequentially constructed in a form to ensure the structure is safe in itself.
- Dependent on the scale of the project that there are adequate and optional routes for egress for personnel working on the project. Consideration of the routes utilising temporary works, e.g. scaffolding and usable parts of the building should be considered.
- During construction it does not generate an undue risk for adjacent properties. Recent fires have shown this to be an important aspect.
Engineers are used to providing statements and loadings for the temporary condition of structural elements to ensure stability is maintained during the construction process. Designers should also get used to providing data to contractors on fire safety to highlight the residual risks present until the frame is encapsulated.
- Consider the consequences of their decisions on the work of other designers (maybe not appointed at that time), and on the build sequence as noted above.
- Co-ordinate their design with other designers.
- Communicate and co-operate with other parties as necessary.
- Pass on information relating to their design to other designers and others.
 The building control process
As with all forms of construction it is necessary to distinguish between the aims of the building control process and other legislation.
In broad terms, the building regulations are not concerned with issue of safety during the construction phase unless these will directly lead to non-compliance in the completed state. It is also noted that third party approvals such as NHBC timber frame certification do not refer to the construction process. However, health and safety legislation is concerned with safety during the construction phase (and over the life of the structure) and places obligations on all parties.
In Scotland, the Certifier of Design will have a responsibility to ensure that the building design overall is compliant with the building regulations for Scotland. No such equivalent formal oversight occurs in England and Wales. However, in neither case is there a responsibility under building regulations for ensuring construction phase safety.
This topic paper was issued by SCOSS in March 2015. You can view the original here.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
IHBC book review: Charles Barry’s monumental struggle to rebuild the Houses of Parliament.
Read about RSHP's British Museum extension which has been shortlisted for the 2017 Stirling Prize.
Read our introductory article to building a house extension.
More updates from DCMS about the large-scale testing of cladding systems and the number of buildings affected.
UandI secure resolution to grant planning consent for major new regeneration project.
IHBC article considers how heritage is dealt with when infrastructure schemes are authorised.
It was the tallest structure in the world for 3,800 years, but to this day the exact construction techniques are a mystery.
Shortlist for the industry's most coveted award announced.
Government responds to Mark Farmer's review of industry, rejecting the call for a levy on clients.
Peter Hansford to examine what wider lessons can be learned from the fire.
Every project is subject to uncertainty. How can construction better understand uncertainty for performance improvement?
MAD Architects reveal their designs for a futuristic campus for electric car manufacturer.
Homebuyers could borrow more with better forecasting of energy bills, according to industry consortium's new report.