- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 09 Sep 2017
The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005
It was intended to “...reduce burdens on business that are caused by the existence of multiple, overlapping general fire safety regimes – and consequently overlap of the responsibilities of enforcing authorities.... consolidate and rationalise much existing fire safety legislation (and) reduce the number of enforcing authorities dealing with general fire safety matters.”
The Order requires that owners of premises other than private dwellings appoint a responsible person (the person having control of the building, or a degree of control) who takes reasonable steps to reduce the risk from fire and makes sure people can safely escape if there is a fire. This includes all people that might visit the premises.
- Identifying fire hazards.
- Considering who may be at risk.
- Eliminating or reducing risk where reasonably possible.
- Providing fire precautions to deal with remaining risk.
- Taking special precautions where there are flammable or explosive materials.
- Recording major findings of the risk assessment and the action taken. This will include informing and instructing relevant people, providing training and creating an emergency plan.
- Reviewing the findings regularly and when necessary.
Fire authorities no longer issue fire certificates. However, they remain the main agency responsible for enforcement, carrying out inspections, assessing complaints and undertaking investigations. They have the power to offer advice, issue formal notices, and prevent premises from being used for certain purposes. They may issue alterations notices for high risk premises, requiring that they are informed if certain alterations are planned to the premises.
A review of the Order published by the Department for Business Innovation & Skills in 2013, Enforcement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, found that the need for the Order was generally understood, however:
- There is considerable discretion as to how each fire authority approaches its duties, leading to frustrating inconsistencies.
- There is a strong sense that fire protection departments are given less prominence than operational fire-fighters or community safety teams.
- Many small businesses are not aware of their specific responsibilities under the changes made to the legislation.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Building regulations.
- Fire and rescue service.
- Fire authority.
- Fire damper.
- Fire detection and alarm system.
- Fire Door Inspection Scheme.
- Fire inspector.
- Fire Prevention on Construction Sites.
- Fire protection engineering.
- Fire safety design.
- Health and safety executive.
- Joint fire code.
- Managing fire risk in commercial buildings: A guide for facilities managers.
- Visual alarm devices - their effectiveness in warning of fire.
 External references
Featured articles and news
GMP is an agreement with a contractor that the contract sum will not exceed a specified maximum. Read more here.
The BREEAM Sustainability Champion is changing to the Advisory Professional - here's what you need to know.
A fresh round of job-cuts takes the total number of redundancies to over 1,000.
Read our introductory article to the completion date in construction contracts.
Almost 90% of freight in London is moved by road. The River Thames could add much needed extra capacity.
National Infrastructure Commission warn that large infrastructure projects are at risk of falling behind.
The quality of Cambridge owes as much to its open spaces as to its architectural uniqueness.
If events occur that cause the completion of the works to be delayed then these may be compensation events.
BSRIA's new Building MOTs Scheme is designed to provide guidance on the next steps after compliance.
At an ICE discussion, the focus was on delivering a Northern Infrastructure Strategy based on opportunity for all.