- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 03 Dec 2020
The term ‘sacrificial timber’ refers to timber in a structural assembly that is intentionally oversized in order to enhance its fire resistance. Timber burns at a regular and measurable rate, so exposed timber sections can be designed with an additional 'sacrificial' element (ie increased width and/or depth) that will char slowly and protect the inner, structural timber from fire damage.
Sacrificial timber can be a design solution if a solid timber member is to be exposed – either fully or partly – or if full fire resistance cannot be provided by plasterboard (or other) fire insulating materials.
The outer surface of a timber element will typically char in a fire, with temperatures in excess of 350°C necessary for flaming to occur. The charred portion of the timber then acts as an insulator and, although some will be irreparably damaged (or ‘sacrificed’), the core timber retains its stability and structural integrity.
The density, and therefore the charring rate, of the timber element will determine the required quantity of sacrificial timber. BS EN 1995-1-2:2004 provides charring rates for different timber materials for the purposes of informing initial design.
|MATERIAL||CHARRING RATE ßn (mm/min)|
|Softwood glulam and laminated veneer lumber (LVL)||0.7|
|Hardwood timber and hardwood glulam||0.55|
2 x 20 x 0.8 = 32 mm
The width and depth of the element would require 32 mm of sacrificial timber.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
As energy prices jump up in cost.
With people in the UK from Ukraine.
Industry leader Steve Murray takes on role.
An abundant and versatile building material.
600,000 heat pump installations targeted per year by 2028.
Helping prevent those unwanted outcomes.
How has transport changed due to Covid-19 ?
Will you need it ? after June 15 and the new Part O ?
Create an account and write the first of many articles.
CIAT commentary after the first meeting.
Who is to blame?
Research recommends focussing on portfolio success rather than project success.
The revised standard for mapping underground utilities.
Cross-industry steering group seeks support in delivery.