- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 03 Dec 2020
The term ‘sacrificial timber’ refers to timber in a structural assembly that is intentionally oversized in order to enhance its fire resistance. Timber burns at a regular and measurable rate, so exposed timber sections can be designed with an additional 'sacrificial' element (ie increased width and/or depth) that will char slowly and protect the inner, structural timber from fire damage.
Sacrificial timber can be a design solution if a solid timber member is to be exposed – either fully or partly – or if full fire resistance cannot be provided by plasterboard (or other) fire insulating materials.
The outer surface of a timber element will typically char in a fire, with temperatures in excess of 350°C necessary for flaming to occur. The charred portion of the timber then acts as an insulator and, although some will be irreparably damaged (or ‘sacrificed’), the core timber retains its stability and structural integrity.
The density, and therefore the charring rate, of the timber element will determine the required quantity of sacrificial timber. BS EN 1995-1-2:2004 provides charring rates for different timber materials for the purposes of informing initial design.
|MATERIAL||CHARRING RATE ßn (mm/min)|
|Softwood glulam and laminated veneer lumber (LVL)||0.7|
|Hardwood timber and hardwood glulam||0.55|
2 x 20 x 0.8 = 32 mm
The width and depth of the element would require 32 mm of sacrificial timber.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
LETI publishes guidance for energy efficient home retrofits.
Predictions about adequate post-pandemic IAQ in non-domestic buildings.
Government publishes plans to 'build back greener'.
The contentious nature of claims associated with cladding, fire safety and EWS1 forms.
ECA comments on low-carbon heating systems initiative and Heat and Buildings Strategy.
Cinders and other forms of domestic rubbish created filth but also generated great wealth.
CIC 2050 Group requests input to find out priorities for future industry leaders.
IHBC publishes response to consultation.
Institute applauds funding initiatives but presses for additional retrofit and tax measures.