- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 19 Dec 2018
Hackitt review of the building regulations and fire safety, final report
On 28 July 2017, following the Grenfell Tower fire, Communities Secretary Sajid Javid announced an independent review of the building regulations and fire safety. The review was led by Dame Judith Hackitt, and focussed specifically on issues related to high-rise residential buildings, including:
- The regulatory system around design, construction and on-going management.
- Compliance and enforcement issues.
- International regulation and experience in this area.
On 16 May 2018, Building a Safer Future, Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety: Final Report, was published, setting out more than 50 recommendations for government as to how to deliver a more robust regulatory system.
In the report Dame Hackitt suggests that; “…there is a need for a radical rethink of the whole system and how it works. This is most definitely not just a question of the specification of cladding systems, but of an industry that has not reflected and learned for itself, nor looked to other sectors.”
The recommendations are intended to apply to new and existing high-rise residential properties which are 10 storeys high or more. In some cases however, the review suggests applying specific recommendations to a wider set of buildings, and it is proposed that the scope could be extended in light of either critical information emerging or experience of operating the new regime.
The report suggests that:
- The roles and responsibilities of those procuring, designing, constructing and maintaining buildings are unclear.
- The package of regulations and guidance can be ambiguous and inconsistent.
- The processes that drive compliance with building safety requirements are weak and complex with poor record keeping and change control.
- Competence across the system is patchy.
- Product testing, labelling and marketing is opaque and insufficient.
- The voices of residents often go unheard.
It calls for a new framework designed to:
- Create a more simple and effective mechanism for driving building safety.
- Provide stronger oversight of dutyholders.
- Reassert the role of residents.
The recommendations of the report include:
- A new regulatory framework for multi-occupancy higher-risk residential buildings (HRRBs) that are 10 storeys or more in height.
- A new Joint Competent Authority (JCA) comprising Local Authority Building Standards, fire and rescue authorities and the Health and Safety Executive to oversee better management of safety risks in these buildings (through safety cases) across their entire life cycle.
- A mandatory incident reporting mechanism.
- New dutyholder roles and responsibilities aligned with the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015.
- A series of robust gateway points to strengthen regulatory oversight.
- Stronger change control processes.
- A single, more streamlined, regulatory route to oversee building standards. Oversight of HRRBs will only be provided through Local Authority Building Standards as part of the JCA, with Approved Inspectors available to expand local authority capacity/expertise or to provide accredited verification and consultancy services to dutyholders.
- More rigorous enforcement powers.
- A clear and identifiable dutyholder with responsibility for building safety.
- Delivering building safety as a system rather than by considering a series of competing or isolated objectives.
- A more effective testing regime with clearer labelling and product traceability.
- Obligating the creation of a digital record for new HRRBs from initial design intent through to construction and including any changes that occur throughout occupation.
In relation to the regulations themselves, Dame Hackitt suggests that; “…some of those who construct buildings treat the minimum standards in the Approved Documents as a high bar to be negotiated down, rather than genuinely owning the principles of a safe building and meeting the outcomes set out in the regulations “
The report proposes that the future structure of guidance should support an outcomes-based approach and that the responsibility for developing guidance should be moved to the industry. It also highlights the complexity of supporting guidance beneath the Approved Documents, which reference a wide range of other documents and standards, increasing confusion and making it difficult to determine how to meet requirements. Instead, it suggests that there should be a single, coherent suite of guidance documents with multiple points of entry for different users, and the ability to read across functional requirements.
The report recommends significantly reducing the use of desktop studies rather than physical testing of materials or systems, but stops short of banning them, stating; 'The proposed change does not ban assessments in lieu of tests, as there are some products and systems for which a full-scale physical test is not possible, but it will significantly reduce their use and ensure that those which are carried out are conducted rigorously and properly recorded for further scrutiny.'
There has been criticism that the review did not call for a ban on flammable cladding. Labour MP David Lammy said; "It is unthinkable and unacceptable that so many people can die in a disaster like Grenfell and one year on flammable cladding has not been banned."
Lord Porter, chairman of the Local Government Association, said: "...our immediate priority is to ensure that a fire like that at Grenfell never happens again, and to make certain the buildings which people live, visit and work in are safe today. It is therefore disappointing that Dame Judith has stopped short of recommending a ban on combustible materials and the use of desktop studies, both essential measures to improve safety."
In response, Dame Judith said; "The guidance already says that you can only use materials of limited combustibility or materials that have been fully tested... It is clear from Grenfell and from the other tests that have been done that despite the guidance currently saying that, people were putting other materials up, so I don't think a ban will work."
RIBA President Ben Derbyshire said; "Whilst there are elements of Dame Judith Hackitt’s Review that we very much welcome, we are extremely concerned that it has failed to act on the urgent need to immediately protect life safety through a more detailed programme of simplified and improved regulations, standards and guidance."
However, Brian Waters, President ACA (Association of Consultant Architects) said; "Dame Judith Hackitt’s report has been greeted with a simplistic outcry criticising her failure to demand a blanket ban on inflammable cladding on high rise buildings. The responsible minister has bowed to public and media pressure to look into this proposition... This would be just a cop-out and it is disappointing that the RIBA has gone along with it."
Nick Baveystock, Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) Director General said; “The Hackitt Review’s recommendations in many respects align with those put forward by ICE in its interim In Plain Sight report, which focused on the safety of infrastructure assets. It is important the construction industry continues to strive to ensure the highest levels of competence, working coherently to improve the governance of the development, management and operation of assets." (Ref. https://www.ice.org.uk/news-and-insight/latest-ice-news/hackitt-review-response)
BRE's acting CEO Niall Trafford said; "We endorse the urgent need to create a simpler and more effective mechanism for driving building safety... In particular, we are very supportive of a new regulatory framework focused, in the first instance, on higher risk residential buildings 10 storeys or more in height and a new Joint Competent Authority (JCA) to oversee this. We welcome the call for a more streamlined, regulatory route to oversee building standards and more rigorous powers to enforce these”.
Julia Evans, BSRIA Chief Executive, said; “How building regulations are implemented is BSRIA’s key area of concern. A robust method of ensuring buildings are built to the intended standard is something BSRIA is calling for. In fact – the web of regulations – the standards themselves, the framework and implementation – needs unpicking. Independent verification of the performance of components and buildings is necessary."
 Government response
Responding for the government, Secretary of State for Housing James Brokenshire MP said; "Dame Judith is clear that the current system - developed over many years and successive governments – is not fit for purpose. She is calling for major reform and a change of culture, with the onus more clearly on everyone involved to manage the risks they create at every stage and government doing more to set and enforce high standards. This government agrees with that assessment and supports the principles behind the report’s recommendations for a new system."
He went on to confirm that the government:
- Is consulting on significantly restricting or banning the use of desktop studies to assess cladding systems.
- Is working with industry to clarify Building Regulations fire safety guidance, and will publish this for consultation in July.
- Will consult on banning the use of combustible materials in cladding systems on high-rise residential buildings.
- Will work with the industry to make the wider suite of building regulations guidance more user-friendly.
Responding to an urgent question by Labour MP John Healy on 21 May 2018, Brokenshire said; "Having listened carefully to the arguments for banning combustible materials in cladding systems on high-rise residential buildings, the government are minded to agree and will consult accordingly."
In June 2018, Housing Secretary James Brokenshire launched a consultation on banning the use of combustible materials in the external walls of high-rise residential buildings.
In June 2018, an independent steering group was set up to progress the key recommendations of the Hackitt review which identified a lack of skills, knowledge and experience at every stage of the lifecycle of higher-risk residential buildings.
The 'Steering Group on Competencies for Building a Safer Future' will be a sub-group of the Industry Response Group (IRG) established in July 2017 to coordinate action and advice to building owners, and will continue the capacity and competence work started by the IRG. The group will be chaired by Construction Industry Council (CIC) chief executive Graham Watts, who also chairs the IRG. Peter Caplehorn (Construction Products Association) and Peter Yates (Local Government Association) will be Deputy Chairs.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- ACM cladding testing by BRE.
- ACM cladding.
- Approved documents.
- BS 8414 Fire performance of external cladding systems.
- BS 9991:2015 Fire safety in the design, management and use of residential buildings. Code of practice.
- BS 9999: Code of practice for fire safety in the design, management and use of buildings.
- Building a safer future: an implementation plan.
- Building regulations.
- Celotex insulation.
- CIC response to Hackitt report.
- Consultation on banning the use of combustible materials in the external walls of high-rise residential buildings.
- Fire performance of external thermal insulation for walls of multistorey buildings, third edition (BR 135).
- Grenfell Tower articles.
- Grenfell Tower Fire.
- Grenfell Tower independent expert advisory panel
- Grenfell Tower industry response group.
- Grenfell Tower Inquiry.
- Grenfell Tower working group.
- ICE Grenfell Tower review.
- Independent review of the building regulations and fire safety.
- Joint Competent Authority.
- Lakanal House fire.
- Rainscreen cladding.
- RIBA Plan of Work for Fire Safety.
- Ronan Point.
- The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005.
- Torre Windsor office building fire.
Featured articles and news
Insights from New York.
A quick introduction to a very complicated subject.
CIOB suggests the economic reach of construction is double the official figures.
The first US building to achieve BREEAM Outstanding In-Use.
70 buildings from 70 years of Concrete Quarterly. Book review.
Conserving the iron roof at the Albert Dock.
Delivering an infrastructure revolution.
The admissibility of evidence.
How many can you name? 37 anyone?
CIOB respond to the points-based system.
When is the weather considered 'exceptionally adverse'?