Last edited 20 Aug 2018

Consultation on banning the use of combustible materials in the external walls of high-rise residential buildings


[edit] Overview

On 18 June 2018, Housing Secretary James Brokenshire announced a consultation on banning the use of combustible materials on the external walls of residential buildings which are 18 m or more tall. This is despite the fact that the Hackitt review of the building regulations and fire safety, final report did not recommend such a ban, and the cladding used on Grenfell Tower did not comply with the existing building regulations and so should not have been used.

The consultation is inviting views on proposals to revise the building regulations to ban the use of combustible materials in the inner leaf, insulation and cladding of the external walls of residential buildings which are 18 m or more tall, and whether only materials in the top two European classes for fire performance should be allowed over the entire external wall system, with limited exemptions covering parts of the wall, such as paint, that do not present a significant risk.

The government repeated advice that the clearest ways of ensuring an external wall system resists external fire spread are either for all of the relevant elements of the wall to be Class A1 or Class A2, or to use an external wall system which can be shown to have passed a large-scale test conducted to BS8414. The government pointed out that whilst Dame Judith Hackitt did not propose an outright ban, she did suggest that using products which are non-combustible or of limited combustibility was the lower risk option rather than undergoing a full system test.

James Brokenshire said; ”I have listened carefully to concerns and I intend to ban the use of combustible materials on the external walls of high-rise residential buildings, subject to consultation… I believe that the changes on which we are consulting will offer even greater certainty to concerned residents and to the construction industry.”

A separate consultation has been carried out into banning or restricting the use of desktop studies to assess the fire performance of cladding systems.

[edit] RIBA submission

In August 2018, the RIBA submitted evidence to the government's consultation on the banning of combustible materials in the external walls of high-rise residential buildings. They suggested that the only way to ensure that such buildings are safe and fit for the future, is a complete ban.

Contrary to those arguing for Class A2 products of 'limited combustibility' to continue to be permitted, the RIBA state that Class A1 'non-combustible' certification is the way forward. They also 'strongly recommend' that the ban is extended to include any high-rise buildings, not just residential.

Adrian Dobson, Executive Director Professional Services at the Royal Institute of British Architects said:

“Continuing to allow materials of ‘limited combustibility’ (A2 classification) is unacceptable in the wake of the tragedy at Grenfell Tower and the evidence from the UK and around the world that these materials do not provide adequate protection for the public.

"There is a lot of confusion in the industry over what materials are, and should be, permitted on both new buildings and in the retro-fitting of existing buildings. Banning these materials is the first step towards restoring the trust in our regulatory system and the building industry.”


[edit] Updates

In August 2018, the UK's human rights watchdog, the Equality and Human Rights Commission wrote to MHCLG outlining its concerns that the government is breaching human rights obligations by failing to address the systemic problems that led to the Grenfell Tower tragedy, chiefly the continued use of combustible cladding.

The Commission expressed concerns that the consultation on the ban does not include any reference to the duty to protect lives enshrined under article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights and schedule 1 to the Human Rights Act 1998.

The Commission said; “Combustible cladding is still present in many other buildings as well, including schools, leisure centres and hospitals. Estimates of the number of buildings affected run into the thousands, with the estimated costs of replacing combustible materials running into many millions of pounds. All those costs stem from the state’s failure to provide a building construction and fire safety system that is fit for purpose.”


[edit] Find out more

[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki