- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 05 Oct 2020
Polyurethane spray foam in structurally insulated panels and composite structures
First produced by the German-born industrial chemist Otto Bayer in 1937, versions of polyurethane today are ubiquitous and go largely unnoticed in many products throughout the world. While early compounds focused on the production of fibres and flexible foams (polyurethanes were used on a small scale as an aircraft coating during World War 2), since polyurethane became commercially available in 1954 ever more applications have been found.
Polyurethane foam is one of the most efficient insulating materials available, offering thermal conductivity of around 0.020 W/m2K. To put this into perspective, a brick wall would have to be 860 mm thick to achieve a comparative level of insulation to 25 mm of polyurethane foam (or 45 mm of mineral wool insulation, 140 mm of softwood, or 380 mm of concrete block).
In addition, as a closed-cell foam applied to facing materials it adds strength to a structure. For example, the ability of polyurethane foam to flow-through and adhere to the inside surfaces of a cavity, provides a continuous bond between the faces that can be considered a structural element. With its application to the underside of a roof, it can help secure tiles and offer a similar level of protection to a breather membrane; whilst also adding an insulting layer.
 Producing polyurethane
The properties of polyurethane can be influenced by the types of isocyanates and the polyols used to make them. These can range from tough or rigid versions, through to long, flexible segments; with different characteristics being controlled by the polyol using cross-links - the term given to a bond that links one polymer chain to another - with long chains and intermediate cross-linking making a polymer useful for foam.
 Types of polyurethane spray foam
Polyurethane spray foams are categorised as either ‘open-cell’ or ‘closed-cell’; with several major differences between the two types, with advantages and disadvantages for both depending on the desired application or requirements.
 Closed-cell polyurethane spray foam
- The principle advantages of closed-cell polyurethane spray foam are:
- Low thermal conductivity of down to 0.020 W/m2K.
- Low vapour permeability.
- Highly effective as an air barrier.
- Increases wall strength when used as part of a composite structure.
- Ablility to resist water.
- Ability to absorb sound - Especially bass tones.
- Medium density – typically around 32 g/m3.
 Open-cell polyurethane spray foam
Open-cell polyurethane spray foam is usually found in densities ranging from 6.4 kg/m3 to 19 kg/m3. One of the advantages that these low densities provide is that they offer a more economical yield; since foam density is directly related to yield - lower density = higher yield.
Open-cell polyurethane spray foam is more permeable to moisture, with perm ratings of approximately 10.0 per 100 mm thickness. However, the foam allows for a very controlled diffusion of moisture vapour whose consistency can be managed by correct specification.
Open-cell polyurethane foams are effective as a sound barrier; having about twice the acoustic resistance in normal frequency ranges as closed-cell polyurethane foams. Other characteristics of open-cell polyurethane foam include a softer, ‘spongier’ appearance, as well as lower strength and rigidity than closed-cell foam. These foams should not be relied upon to provide a structural element in the build environment, however, their other characteristics make them ideal for use in the manufacture of be-spoke insulated panels.
Principle advantages of open-cell polyurethane spray foam:
- Low thermal conductivity values of down to 0.020 W/m2K.
- Higher vapour permeability.
- Economical yield .
- Effective air barrier properties.
- Excellent sound absorption in normal noise frequency ranges.
- Low density.
 Slow-rise and quick-cure polyurethane spray foams
For the production of bespoke panels, slow-rise polyurethane foams should be used. This allows the foam to flow throughout the mould, filling the entire void prior to the foam curing. Quick-cure polyurethane foams, on the other hand, are primarily intended for open surface applications, being able to bond to virtually any surface and cure in seconds, due, in part, to their limited flow time.
Injecting slow-rise polyurethane spray foam into a pre-assembled panel is less time consuming and much cleaner than applying the quick-cure alternative onto an open surface. Slow-rise polyurethane foam also cuts down on wastage by reducing both the need for trimming and the mess from overspray commonly associated with quick-cure foams.
In-place density refers to the apparent cured density of the foam as it exists in its final form. This will generally be higher than the free-rise density of the foam, and will vary depending on the actual amount of foam that is dispensed into a cavity of fixed volume. In-place density is important because the final strength and physical properties of the foam will be improved and optimised by increasing the in-place density of the foam.
In-place density may be increased by dispensing a larger amount of foam into the mould than is theoretically needed to fill it, based on free-rise density calculations. This process is referred to as "packing" the foam. Proper mould venting can reduce mould pressure and help keep densities lower.
Slow-rise foam is recommended to be dispensed at an in-place density of 32 kg/m3 in order to achieve the optimum physical properties. It is possible to fill to slightly higher or lower in-place densities depending on the specific application requirements, mould strength and orientation.
For example: 32 kg/m3 X .057 m3 = 1.8 kg.
Mould pressure is difficult to predict, however, there will be pressure exerted by any pour-in-place foam in nearly all applications and so all moulds need to be designed with stays or braced in some way. The amount of clamping required is dependent on the application and the desired in-place density. The higher the density; the higher the pressure. Pre-testing of a sample panel will give an indication of the number of stays or bracing required for a particular mould design. In general, the more foam that is put into the mould, the higher the mould pressure and subsequently, the stronger the fixturing that is required.
 Application shot time
The term ‘shot time’ refers to the length of time necessary to dispense the desired amount of foam into the cavity or mould. Shot time can be estimated from the volume of the mould and the desired In-place density of the foam.
The actual shot time will also depend on several other factors such as:
There are two basic positions used to describe mould orientation:
- Horizontal pour.
- Vertical pour.
Vertical pour describes a panel that is longer in its height - or vertical direction - than its thickness. A horizontal pour is orientated where the longest dimensions are in the horizontal direction.
As a general rule, the foam does not have to work as hard when the mould is oriented horizontally, which makes this the preferred mould position in many applications. This is because the foam will need to rise a shorter distance and the cell structure will then tend to be stronger, since the foam cells are less elongated in the direction of rise.
Mould orientation is the most important consideration when determining the specific requirements for applying foam in a ‘pour-in place’ application. The best results are determined by controlled trials and testing as part of the design process.
Proper mould venting can reduce mould pressure and help keep densities lower by allowing the gasses and products to exhaust and flash. Always provide sufficient air escape holes to allow the rising foam to push out any trapped gasses as the mould is filled.
All materials exhibit some expansion or contraction according to temperature changes. Polyurethane foam systems are subject to volume changes under extreme conditions due to the cellular structure and the closed cell nature of the product, in addition to the normal expansion / contraction caused by temperature differentials.
Dimensional stability tests should be carried out to insure that the foam will perform as expected. It is important to consider the various factors in the application stage that can affect the product's ultimate strength, namely the ‘in-place’ density, temperature and mould orientation.
The in-place density is a property which will greatly affect strength, since the higher the density, the higher the strength of the foam, or the more resistant the foam is to environmental changes. The in-place density may vary, but is tested at a nominal 32 kg/m3 for comparison and specification purposes. Higher in-place densities may improve physical properties but, at the same time, will reduce the cost-effectiveness of the product, as well as producing higher mould pressures and reduced flow-ability. Correspondingly, lower in-place densities may increase the likelihood of volume changes under extreme conditions.
In addition, mould orientation, which forces the foam to rise a long distance, will tend to elongate and stretch the cells, which can also weaken the ultimate strength of the foam. The appropriate ratio of chemicals is, of course, critical to achieving optimum performance and must be assured for success in any application.
 Effects of temperature
Air temperature plays a critical role in the performance of any two-component polyurethane foam system. Both the liquid chemical temperature and the ambient temperature, (i.e. mould temperature), will affect system performance. The recommended chemical temperature is in the range between 24-29°C. The chemical must be stabilised within this range. If the chemicals are not within this range they may dispense in the incorrect ratio, leading to poor quality foam.
Because of its very low moisture vapour transmission properties, polyurethane foam may be considered a 'vapour retarder' when applied in sufficient thickness. There is no definition of what constitutes a vapour retarder as opposed to a vapour barrier, but the insulating and air barrier properties of polyurethane foam make it an excellent solution to condensation and humidity build-up in properly designed applications.
- Insulation specification.
- Sandwich panel.
- BREEAM Insulation.
- Building fabric.
- Curtain wall systems.
- Expanding foam.
- Metal composite panels.
- Polyurethane (PUR).
- Structural Insulated Panels.
- Wall types.
 British Standards Associated with the Insulation of Walls:
- BS 4841-1:2006 - Rigid polyisocyanurate (PIR) and polyurethane (PUR) products for building end-use applications. Specification for laminated insulation boards with auto-adhesively or separately bonded facings.
- BS 4841-2:2006 - Rigid polyisocyanurate (PIR) and polyurethane (PUR) products for building end-use applications. Specification for laminated boards with auto-adhesively bonded facings for use as thermal insulation for internal wall linings and ceilings.
- BS7456 - Stabilisation and thermal insulation of cavity walls.
- BS 7457:1994 - Specification for polyurethane (PUR) foam systems suitable for stabilisation and thermal insulation of cavity walls with masonry or concrete inner and outer leaves.
- BS 8216:1991 - Code of practice for use of sprayed lightweight mineral coatings used for thermal insulation and sound absorption in buildings.
- BS EN 12086:1997 - Thermal insulating products for building applications. Determination of water vapour transmission properties.
- BS EN 13165:2001 - Thermal insulation products for buildings. Factory made rigid polyurethane foam (PUR) products.
Featured articles and news
So why not write something?
LETI publishes guidance for energy efficient home retrofits.
Predictions about adequate post-pandemic IAQ in non-domestic buildings.
Government publishes plans to 'build back greener'.
The contentious nature of claims associated with cladding, fire safety and EWS1 forms.
ECA comments on low-carbon heating systems initiative and Heat and Buildings Strategy.
Cinders and other forms of domestic rubbish created filth but also generated great wealth.
CIC 2050 Group requests input to find out priorities for future industry leaders.
IHBC publishes response to consultation.