- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 28 Mar 2019
A living facade is a vertical surface incorporating vegetation into its structure or face to facilitate various aesthetic, environmental, social or economic functions and benefits. While research and studies on the subject are limited, it is thought that living facades could make a significant contribution to sustainability if properly integrated.
Also known as; living walls, vertical greenery systems, vertical gardens and vertical vegetated complex walls, they should not be confused with green walls (the process of allowing climbing plants such as ivy to scale a wall while being rooted in the ground).
 Growing systems
Living facades can be grown and supported in two ways:
Both of these methods have advantages and disadvantages and many of the benefits attributed to living facades will apply to both. However, soil-based walls tend to be confined to free-standing walls or gardens, and due to their weight, are rarely used in conjunction with buildings. Therefore, this article will deal mainly with hydroponic walls.
Vegetation on a living facade has to:
- Have a medium to be grown on.
- Be provided with enough water.
- Be provided with enough nutrients.
- Receive enough sunlight for photosynthesis.
- Water and nutrient-carrying capacity (porosity).
- Ability for roots to take hold.
Common rooting media can include:
- Coco husk.
- Rock wool.
- Mineral wool.
- Porous foam.
- Wire mesh (with container for roots).
 Structural systems
 Modular panel system
Panels of pre-planted vegetation are fitted to a support system that provides structure and a mechanical watering system. Pre-planting means that an instant green effect can be achieved upon completion. Composition of the modules will vary depending on the requirements of the vegetation, but will need to contain nutrients and material for the roots to hold. Soil can be used, but due to its weight it can only realistically be of use for small scale walls.
 Synthetic felt
Pioneered by Patrick Blanc, this system uses synthetic felt as a base for vegetation, with water and nutrients provided mechanically. A metal frame is used for the structure, with a 10 mm PVC layer riveted to it and the felt stapled to this. The metal frame allows the structure to be attached to the facade allowing an air gap between the two layers which prevents vegetation from affecting the building structurally while aiding the thermal and acoustic properties of the facade.
The PVC layer prevents moisture escaping and provides rigidity to the entire structure. The polyamide felt layer consists of two overlapping sheets with various pockets that secure the plants. The choice of material is determined by its resistance to rotting and a high capillarity allowing water and nutrients to be distributed well. This facade has the benefit of only weighing 30 kg per metre squared.
 Container and trellis
A series of containers house the plants with trellis in-between, allowing the vegetation to climb and create an uninterrupted face of vegetation. Water and nutrients can be provided mechanically with either a synthetic or soil based growing medium.
 Positive effects
It has long been recognised that indoor plants can help improve the air quality in offices and an internal living wall can provide a similar effect and help rejuvenate 'sick' buildings. The plants absorb carbon dioxide and other particulates purifying the air.
The external air quality can also be improved by a living facade as it is able to absorb the carbon dioxide and pollutants from traffic. It has been shown that a living facade can have a major impact on the levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particulate matter (PM) in urban areas in which there are street canyons (where the height of buildings exceeds the distance between them). Street canyons cause the air to swirl and eddy around the vegetation enabling increased levels of particles to be absorbed.
A study carried out by Lancaster University found a reduction in street level concentrations of up to 40% for NO2 and 60% for particulate matter. With NO2 and particulate matter making up a large quantity of air pollutants, a reduction in concentrations of this magnitude would have a positive effect on air pollution in urban areas.
 Thermal performance
The thermal effects of living facades are very similar to those of green roofs. ie, reduction in surface temperatures due to shading from vegetation, evapotranspiration and increased thermal mass. This can lead to a cooler internal climate and a reduction in urban heat island effect.
- The vegetation shades the solid wall behind it, preventing solar gains.
- Vegetation absorbs radiation therefore reducing reflection.
- The increased thermal mass of the vegetation and substructure reduces the flow of temperature through the building skin.
- Transpiration: the effect of water loss from vegetation by evaporation. Heat is carried away in the form of water vapour.
- Protection from cold winds.
A 2010 study by the National University of Singapore found that the surface temperature of living walls was significantly reduced compared to a concrete control wall, with reductions of 6 to 10 degrees recorded. Analysis of the results concluded that shading and transpiration seemed to be the main contributors to this decrease.
An Urban Heat Island is the localised increase of temperature in urban centres as opposed to surrounding rural areas due to a profusion of heat retaining surfaces. It is thought that the reduction in surface temperatures due to living facades could help reduce the temperatures in urban areas.
A computer model based analysis at the University of Cardiff found a significant reduction of the temperature in urban canyons when building envelopes were fully 'greened'. A similar conclusion was reached in a study by the University of Manchester, which found that an increase in green cover of 10% in urban areas could lead to a reduction in maximum temperatures.
It is thought that living facades may contribute to an increase in biodiversity in urban areas by providing a habitat for insects and birds. Although specific testing on the biodiversity of living facades has not yet been thoroughly undertaken, there are examples of wildlife such as birds using living walls as their home. Any survey would have to acknowledge the potential disadvantages of increased biodiversity on a buildings facade.
Vegetation is widely used to reduce the noise levels from busy roads or railway lines and it is thought that living walls may be used to control the acoustics of buildings. A study at the National University of Singapore found that living walls had a higher sound absorption coefficient than many standard building materials and that the noise reduction was also significant.
However, the study pointed out that these results varied greatly depending on the frequencies used, types of plant, percentage cover of wall and type of substrate. Further testing on actual buildings is needed to establish the true acoustic merits of living facades.
Being in effect a vertical garden, the aesthetic qualities of a living facade are obvious and there are many examples where the primary objective is an aesthetic effect. Some of the visual benefits include:
- Rejuveinating bland facades.
- Softening of the urban landscape and allowing buildings to seem more 'natural'.
- Changing aesthetics with season.
- The softening and diffusion of light, which can enhance internal spaces when used in conjunction with glazing.
- Reducing heating and air-conditioning costs.
- Adding commercial value to the building.
- Increased productivity.
 Negative aspects
- Root rot.
- Plants dying.
- The need for trimming.
 Future/incorporation with sustainability
- Integration with air purification and ventilation, e.g. Queens University Biowall.
- Vertical agriculture/farming: vegetables or fruit could be grown on living walls and then harvested, increasing the surface areas available for agriculture.
- Water re-use: since living walls rely on mechanically supplied water, there is the opportunity to use grey water.
Due to living facade technology being quite new, at present there are no specific references in the sustainable code or BREEAM. However, living walls may be able to contribute towards other areas of the code, helping to earn credits.
- Combined with a rainwater harvest tank - Wat /W01
- Native species planted – Eco 2 (ecological enhancement)/LE05
- If significant area of property covered – Eco 4 (change of eco value)
- Possible improvement of thermal performance – Ene1 (Dwelling Emission Rate)/E1
The lack of studies and research into living facades means that the true benefits and negative impacts are yet to be properly understood. Of the few studies available, most are either computer models, or testing carried out in controlled environments.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Dynamic façade.
- Green roof.
- Kinetic facade.
- Landscape design.
- Rain garden.
- Vertical Forest.
 External references
- The Vertical Garden: A Scientific and Artistic approach, Patrick Blanc.
- Thermal evaluation of vertical greenery systems for building walls, Wong, 2010.
- Temperature decreases in an urban canyon due to green walls and green roofs in diverse climates, Alexandri and Jones, 2008.
- Effectiveness of Green Infrastructure for Improvement of Air Quality in Urban Street Canyons, Pugh et. al, 2012.
- Wildlife in our walls..., Biotecure Blog, 2012.
- Acoustics evaluation of vertical greenery systems for building walls, Wong et. al., 2010.
- Green Walls Column, George Irwin, 2012.
- George Urwin on Living Walls, youtube, 2009.
- Human Responses to Vegetation and Landscapes, Ulrich, 1985.
- Living Walls - A way to green the built environment, Loh, 2008.
- Thermal Performance of a Vegetated Cladding System, Cheng et. al, 2010.
Featured articles and news
Re-establishing human relationships with the natural world.
Post-occupancy evaluation of completed construction works.
Seven steps to defining a digital twin.
Achieving air tightness in buildings.
What are the benefits of smart homes for Millennial end-users?
How dynamic briefing can result in an efficient project.
Achieving sustainable roads funding in England.
Your chance to comment on the draft BS 851188 - flood resistance products and flood protection products.
Rebuilding could take 20 to 40 years.
RSHP’s high-rise residential towers win a tall buildings award for excellence.
BSRIA study reveals strong growth in 2018.