- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 03 Feb 2021
Noise at Work Assessment
The ‘Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005’ (‘the NAW Regulations’) set out the legal requirements for protecting employees against risks to their health and safety arising from exposure to noise whilst at work. The aim of the NAW Regulations is to protect workers from suffering long term hearing damage and tinnitus as a result of prolonged exposure to high noise levels in the workplace.
The NAW Regulations apply to all workplaces and mean that employers are legally obliged to risk assess the exposure of their employees’ exposure to noise within the working environment. The employer must employ appropriate control measures to reduce noise exposure where necessary.
Regulation 5 of the NAW Regulations states that a detailed Noise at Work Risk Assessment must be undertaken if an employee is likely to be exposed to noise at or above lower exposure action values. This may occur if a workplace is considered to be noisier than everyday life.
In accordance with Regulation 4 of the NAW Regulations, a set of noise exposure action values are set which relate to the average levels of noise exposure over a working day or week, and the peak sound pressure exposure to which employees are exposed to in a working day.
- ‘Exposure action values’ are levels of exposure to noise which employees can be exposed to, but employers are required to take certain actions to mitigate this risk, including the provision of hearing protection.
- ‘Exposure limit values’ are levels of noise exposure which an employee must not be exposed to, after taking into account the noise reduction provided by personal hearing protection.
|Action Level||Threshold Values||Actions Required if Thresholds Exceeded|
|Lower Exposure Action Value(LEAV)||
· a peak sound pressure level (LCPeak) of 135 dB(C).
(these limits do not account for hearing protection)
In the first instance, the employer should explore other methods of reducing noise levels to as low a level as is reasonably practicable. If the LEAV is still exceeded, then hearing protection is recommended and the employer must provide personal hearing protectors upon the request of any employee in this exposure category (though it must not be compulsory for the employee to wear them unless they are in a designated Hearing Protection Zone (HPZ).
|Upper Exposure Action Value(UEAV)||
· a peak sound pressure level (LCPeak) of 137 dB(C).
(these limits do not account for hearing protection)
|The employer shall reduce exposure to as low a level as is reasonably practicable by establishing and implementing a programme of organisational and technical measures, excluding the provision of personal hearing protectors, which is appropriate to the activity (see following subsections).If the UEAV is still exceeded, then hearing protection is compulsory to employees in this exposure category and must be supplied by the employer. If a particular area is above the UEAV, then this area must be designated as a HPZ. The employers must ensure that affected employees or employees entering the HPZ use hearing protection, who also have a duty to protect themselves.|
|Exposure Limit Value (ELV)||
· a peak sound pressure level (LCPeak) of 140 dB(C).
(the effect of personal hearing protection is accounted for in these limits)
Action must be taken immediately to reduce exposure if this limit has been exceeded. The employer must review the programme of control measures, considering the technical and organisational controls, the adequacy of any hearing protection supplied and systems in place that ensures noise-control measures and hearing protection are properly used and maintained.
2 It may be necessary to conduct ongoing health surveillance for the exceedance of the LEAV and UEAV.
- reduce the noise exposure that produces these risks to as low a level as is reasonably practicable by either:
- reducing noise at source, i.e. by using quieter equipment, a different process, engineering controls, etc.;
- reducing noise levels in the facility, i.e. through sound absorption, keeping noisy machinery away from quieter areas, screens, barriers, or enclosures; and/or
- implementing organisational measures which reduce the length of time that employees are exposed to noise, i.e. turning off equipment when not in use, introducing job rotation so employees are doing a mixture of noisy and quiet tasks rather than spending all day working with high noise level equipment;
- provide employees with hearing protection if the noise exposure cannot be reduced enough by the aforementioned measures and the noise levels remain above the exposure action values;
- provide employees with information, instruction, and training on noise in the workplace; and
- carry out health surveillance where there is a risk because of exposure to loud noise.
Paragraph 66 of Regulation 6 of the NAW Regulations indicates that the employer should generally be seeking to reduce the risk of noise exposure irrespective of whether any exposure action values are exceeded. It may also be necessary to carry out ongoing reviews to the risk assessment at set periods, or when circumstances change.
Regulation 6 of the NAW Regulations states that “the employer shall ensure that risk from the exposure of his employees to noise is either eliminated at source or, where this is not reasonably practicable, reduced to as low a level as is reasonably practicable….. If any employee is likely to be exposed to noise at or above an upper exposure action value, the employer shall reduce exposure to as low a level as is reasonably practicable by establishing and implementing a programme of organisational and technical measures, excluding the provision of personal hearing protectors, which is appropriate to the activity.” The table below provides examples of such measures.
|Reduce noise levels at source||
|Reduce noise propagation throughout the workplace||
 Personal hearing protection
Regulation 7 of the NAW Regulations states that hearing protection is compulsory for employees exposed to levels above the upper exposure action value (UEAV), though this is not compulsory during the quieter times of the day or if the employee is in a quiet area. It is also compulsory for any employee entering a Hearing Protection Zone (HPZ).
Hearing protection is not compulsory for employees exposed to levels below the UEAV. It is not beneficial to force employees to wear hearing protection when it is not necessary, as this can lead to isolation, decreased communication, uncomfortable working conditions and a decreased ability to hear alarms and sirens.
It is also not strictly beneficial to use hearing protectors which overprotect, for the reasons above. The main aim of hearing protection is to reduce noise levels at the ear to below at least the UEAV (85 dB(A)), but they should be avoided if they reduce noise levels to below 70 dB(A).
The table below shows the ‘single number rating’ (SNR) protection factor that is likely to be suitable for different levels of noise. The SNR value is typically stated with the hearing protection device. This is based upon the information in the NAW Regulations, and in BS EN 458:2004: Hearing protectors.
Table 3: Required protection factors for hearing protection
|A-Weighted Noise Level (dB(A)) 1||Select a protector with an SNR of…|
|85 – 90||≤20|
|90 – 95||20 – 30|
|95 – 100||25 – 35|
|100 – 105||≥30|
– Higher levels of protection can be achieved through dual protection, i.e. wearing ear-muffs over ear-plugs.
There are several other factors that influence the choice of which type of hearing protector an employee may wish to use, as outlined in Part 5 of the NAW Regulations, which also states that “wherever possible the employer should make more than one type of protector available (making sure that each is suitable for the noise and jobs to be done) to allow the user a personal choice”.
Employees are often reluctant to use hearing protection, are forgetful, or do not apply protection correctly. A programme of monitoring, supervision, warning notices, instruction, and training is needed to ensure they are used. It is also important that a system of maintenance is employed to ensure that the hearing protection maintains its level of noise reduction and does not become defective over time.
 Hearing protection zones (HPZ)
Regulation 7 of the NAW Regulations states that If any area in the workplace is likely to be exposed to noise levels at or above the upper exposure action value (UEAV) then the employer must ensure that:
- the area is designated a Hearing Protection Zone (HPZ);
- the area is demarcated and identified by means of the sign specified for the purpose of indicating that ear protection must be worn;
- access to the area is restricted where this is practicable and the risk from exposure justifies it; and
- no employee enters that area unless that employee is wearing personal hearing protectors, so far as is reasonably practicable.
The boundaries of HPZs should be considered carefully, i.e. they should avoid overlapping commonly-used walkways and should not extend further than is necessary to protect people carrying out their normal work. In situations where the boundaries of a zone cannot be marked, then attaching hearing protection zone signs to specific tools is an appropriate alternative.
 Information, instruction, and training
Regulation 10 of the NAW Regulations states that the employer must provide ‘information, instruction, and training’ to employees who are exposed to above the LEAV. It is important for the employer to tell employees:
- their likely level of noise exposure and the health risk this carries;
- what the employer is doing to control risks and exposure to noise;
- when and how the employee can obtain hearing protection and when they should use it;
- how the employee should be using hearing protection and noise control equipment in the correct way to minimise their risk, and how they can identify and report defects;
- what the employees’ duties are under the NAW Regulations;
- how the employer is providing a health surveillance system; and
- what symptoms of hearing damage the employee should look out for, and to whom and how they should report this.
This information, instruction, and training can be provided in any way, providing the employee can find it easy to understand. The HSE’s ‘Noise: Don’t lose your hearing!’ pocket card can be handed out to supplement this.
It is also a requirement to discuss the risk assessment and all plans relating to controlling noise exposure with a trade union-appointed safety representative, or for groups of workers not covered by this, an elected employee representative.
Regulation 9 of the NAW Regulations state that there is significant evidence which links regular exposure to noise levels above the exposure action values to long-term health risks and hearing damage. Therefore, the employer should provide health surveillance to:
- all employees who are regularly exposed to noise levels above the upper exposure action values (UEAV); or
- employees who are occasionally exposed above the UEAV, or who are exposed between the lower (LEAV) and upper (UEAV) thresholds but who are known to be particularly sensitive to noise, i.e. from medical history, audiometric testing or a history of noise exposure at previous jobs, or a family history of early-onset deafness.
Health surveillance is a programme of health checks which usually involves regular hearing checks (audiometric testing), keeping health records, and referring employees to a doctor if/when hearing damage is identified. It is useful in warning employees if they exhibit early signs of hearing damage to give the opportunity to do something to prevent the damage from getting worse. It is also effective for the employer to identify whether noise control measures are working.
Surveillance can be introduced at any time for existing employees and should be introduced straightaway for new employees, to allow a baseline to be taken. Annual checks for the first two years (followed by three-yearly checks after this unless a problem is detected or the risk of hearing damage is high) should be conducted by someone with appropriate training, with the whole surveillance programme under the control of an occupational health professional.
 Ongoing assessments
Regulation 5 of the NAW Regulations indicate that the employer should implement an ongoing control programme in managing noise exposure risks. It may be necessary to review and produce an updated risk assessment when circumstances change, for example, if:
- circumstances change in the workplace, i.e. new equipment is installed, older machinery ceases to be used, shift patterns are changed, any reason that employees’ level of noise exposure may have changed;
- noise control measures have been implemented since the previous assessment and the impact on employees’ exposure needs to be re-assessed;
- the employer becomes aware of improved working methods and noise-control techniques that are new to the industry and could be applied to the workplace;
- control measures that could not be implemented at the time of the original assessment become more viable to do so, i.e. because of new technology or reduced costs; and/or
- continued health surveillance shows that employees’ hearing is being damaged, suggesting that noise control methods are not being properly implemented or are not effective enough.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Airborne sound.
- Building acoustics.
- Control of noise at work regulations 2005.
- Environmental health.
- Impact sound.
- Injuries on construction sites.
- Personal protective equipment.
- Sound absorption.
- Sound frequency.
- Sound v noise.
- Structure-borne sound.
- What hours are construction sites allowed to operate?
Featured articles and news
Helping communities preserve and enhance historic environments.
Creating comfortable climates despite extreme temperatures.
Study examines how adjustable arrangements can succeed.
Government announces plans to improve accessibility.
Resource addresses pandemic-related NEC4 contract issues.
Incorporating EDI into the provision of fair access.
Government announces global innovation strategy.
An architectural biography. Book review.
The house where the future king of France lived.
The teacher, architectural technologist and mum offers her insights.
Careful planning needed as supply chain issues continue.
The sensitive conversion of a neglected Cornwall structure.