Last edited 10 Sep 2024

Main author

Archiblog Architect Website

EDUKIT: World Educational System

Item 23625 Re-think.png

• World Map indicating the global imbalance in the provision of educational facilities in the existing system

Contents

[edit] Introduction

Designing Edukit was started by Norman Fellows in July 1996—having been anticipated by Potteries Thinkbelt (PTb) designed by Cedric Price in 1964 and ATOM: A generating system designed by Cedric Price in 1967. It was submitted to the Buckminster Fuller Challenge in March 2015 as an architectural response to a critical need, namely:—

In relation to being socially useful, its origins can be traced back to the PTb and to Atom US. For example:—

and, from the design charrette which produced Atom US:—

The rationality of the PTb and Atom US has been discussed in two related articles on Designing Buildings and is assumed.

In addition, the rationality of two more parts of an egalitarian world educational system - i.e. the Dukeries Thinkbelt (DTb) designed by Norman Fellows in 2014 and Atom UK designed by Norman Fellows in 2017 - has also been discussed in those two related articles and is therefore also assumed.

Thus the purpose of this article is to discuss the rationality of the proposed whole - i.e. 'Edukit' - as opposed to the rationality of the parts - i.e. 'Thinkbelts' and 'Atoms'. It begins with two categorical propositions, namely:—

  1. ... that 'Atoms' are linked to 'Edukit'; and
  2. ... that 'Thinkbelts' are linked to 'Atoms'.

[edit] CATEGORICAL PROPOSITION 1

The premise that Atoms are linked to Edukit raises the following questions in relation to being socially useful, namely:—

  1. 'Where?'
  2. 'When?'
  3. 'To whom?'

Tables 1 - 3 below provide brief answers.

Item 17986 443795.jpg

Fig.1. Atomia: location map.

Atom US was a design for an educational facility located in a projected new town called Atomia near the metropolitan area of Chicago in Illinois in the United States - see Fig.1 (top).

Item 19684.png

Fig. 2. Cambridge-Milton Keynes: location map.

Atom UK is a design for links between Cambridge and Milton Keynes near the metropolitan area of London in the UK - see Fig. 2 (right).

Edukit has been described as:—

Fig. 1 (bottom) and Fig. 2 (left) indicate the respective locations of Atom US and Atom UK on the globe.

In addition:—

(1) William Cannady (1970) has described Atom US as:—

(2) Kathy Velikov (2015) has described it as:—

(3) Cedric Price (1969) has pointed to Atom US as a potential model for Atom UK:—

Furthermore:—

(4) Arthur C. Clarke (1945) has anticipated the development of extra-terrestrial relay services and the role of geostationary satellites:—

  • "A single station could only provide coverage for half the globe, and for a world service three would be required, though more could be readily used. Fig. 3 shows the simplest arrangement."

Item 12828 22763765662 o.png

Fig. 3. Three satellite stations would ensure complete coverage of the globe.

These location maps demonstrate that Edukit is both spatially distributed and localized.

• Table 1: Maps indicating 'where' Atoms and Edukit are linked.

Item 23616.png

Fig. 4. Graph of use cycle and lifespan, Atom US

Atom US was designed in June 1967.

William Canfield (1970) wrote that the kit of parts was:—

  • "...based on John Tirrell and Albert Canfield's educational program for a projected new town which will be feasible by the year 1990."

However, Cedric Price (1968) wrote:—

Atom UK is a work "in progress" started in 2017.

Edukit is a work "in progress" started in 1996.

Fig. 4 charts all of the components that comprised Atom US, mapping out what Kathy Velikov (ib.) called:—

  • "a spatiotemporal choreography for the design."

Thinking longer term, in an interview conducted by Norman Fellows in February 1993, Cedric Price said:—

  • "I think that the trouble with architecture and planners - that the gestation period of having an idea, testing it, working with others to produce a product or a condition, naturally takes a long time - even before you start building - and that takes a long time therefore you're talking about anything from a year to five years, to be honest, in even giving your idea chance to work - so problem-solving is - unless you said you're solving problems of the future but problems of the future don't make themselves known that far in advance - I think it's more anticipation - anticipatory design."

Atom US was an early entry project in the field of education and over fifty years later it is emulated in Atom UK.

These temporal considerations demonstrate that the element of time is a key criterion in the design of Edukit

• Table 2: Time and timings indicating 'when' Atoms and Edukit are linked.

Atom US was subtitled "Design for new learning for a new town"

  • "The provision of educational facilities, in physical terms, should not be tailored to any particular requirements made by any particular authority.
  • [...]
  • The resultant facilities must equate to a total social servicing industry rather than one related largely to a particular age group under particular circumstances."
  • (Cedric Price, AD 5/68)

Item 23591 - Diagrammatic plan of new town.png

Fig. 5. Diagrammatic plan of Atomia

Atom UK began as a spin off from Atom US, namely:—

- see Fig. 6 right.

Initially, its "loose links" are intended to serve the communities between Cambridge and Milton Keynes, including Bedford, before eventually hooking up with Oxford to create a new institution, namely:—

- see Fig. 7 right.

"Edukit is one of two possible contributions to the commons being created in the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford region for governance not by state or market but by the community."

Item 23605.png

Fig. 6. Diagrammatic plan of C-MK

Item 18690 Revision A.png

Fig. 7. Diagrammatic plan of redefined CAMKOX area

These diagrammatic plans demonstrate that Edukit contributes to the commons as a social good (cf. the NHS).

• Table 3: Diagrammatic plans indicating populations 'to whom' Atoms and Edukit are linked.


However, the premise that Atoms are linked to Edukit also raises a particular challenge for the designer, namely:—

4. 'How?'

Table 4 below provides a detailed answer.

Item 23587.png

Item 23588.png

Fig. 8. 'Atom facsimiles' - click to see Full resolutions

Atom US was originally published in the May 1968 issue of Architectural Design in which Guest editor Cedric Price concluded:—

  • "While many of the articles in (the May 1968 issue of AD) refer to schools and school rooms, the common theme is that the buildings and fittings normally associated with the provision of educational facilities are not good enough, and that it is no longer a question of improvement but of re-think."

Item 23593 - Edukit spread.png

Item 12183.png Item 12186 16595282750 o.png

Item 19015 k.png

Fig. 9. 'Edukit images' - click to see Full resolutions

These textual records demonstrate :—

  • "...that universities as we know them have outlived their social usefulness and that a strategic redistribution of financial resources is required if we are to receive the benefits of educational servicing that might reasonably be expected."

• Table 4: Textual records indicating 'how' Atoms and Edukit are linked.

Thus this article provides sufficient evidence to support its major premise, namely:—

  • ... that 'Atoms' are linked to 'Edukit'.

[edit] CATEGORICAL PROPOSITION 2

The premise that Thinkbelts are linked to Atoms also raises the same questions in relation to being socially useful, namely:—

  1. 'Where?'
  2. 'When?'
  3. 'To whom?'

Tables 5 - 7 below provide brief answers.

Thinkbelts are both located in the Midlands of England.

Item 22915.pngFig. 10. Map of the Potteries Thinkbelt

The PTb is located in the West Midlands.

In New Society (1966) Cedric Price asked:—

  • "After the Potteries Thinkbelt, what would be next? A Eurothink on the French-Belgian border?

However, Cedric Price also suggested a follow-up:—

Item 23617.pngFig. 11. Map of the Dukeries Thinkbelt

The DTb is located in the East Midlands.

Atom US is located at what Buckminster Fuller called:—

  • "the approximate dynamic center of the North American continent" (cf. Fig. 1)
  • (Buckminster Fuller, 1962)

Cedric Price suggested another follow-up:—

Item 19424.png

Fig. 12. Site map - sub-regional context of Atom UK

Item 23505.png

Fig. 13. Map of Europe indicating megalopolises

These maps, including Figs. 1, 2 and 3, demonstrate that Thinkbelts and Atoms are linked both spatially and locally.

• Table 5: Maps indicating 'where' Thinkbelts and Atoms are linked.

Item 17813 - 307983.jpg

Fig. 14. Chart of life span and use cycle, PTb (1964)

Item 23618.png

Fig. 15. Chart of life span and use cycle, DTb (2014)

Item 23624.png

Fig. 16. Graph of use cycle and lifespan, Atom UK

- see Fig. 4 above in Table 2.

The charts in Fig. 14 and Fig. 15 demonstrate that Thinkbelts postulated various means of exchange, namely:—

The graphs in Fig. 4 and Fig. 16 demonstrate that Atoms use the same means of exchange.

These Figures demonstrate that Thinkbelts and Atoms are linked by the element of time as a design criterion.

• Table 6: Time and timings indicating 'when' Thinkbelts and Atoms are linked.

Thinkbelt study - work "in progress"

Item 23626 PULL QUOTE.png

Fig. 18. Pull quote from PTb article, AD 10/66

Item 23629.png

Fig. 19. Diagram indicating regional context of DTb

Cedric Price asked in 2003 'what is the value of it now - what is useful about it now, for you?'

Atom study - work "in progress"

Item 19321.png

Fig. 18. National + Regional Conditions of Atom UK

Item 23628.png

Fig. 19. Map indicating possible extension of CAMKOX

These maps demonstrate that Thinkbelts and Atoms are socially useful beyond their immediate contexts.

• Table 7: Diagrammatic plans indicating populations 'to whom' Thinkbelts and Atoms are linked.


However, the premise that Atoms are linked to Edukit raises another challenge for the designer, namely:—

4. 'How?'

Table 8 below provides a detailed answer.

Item 15904 37668064524 o.png

Fig. 20. 'The Potteries Thinkbelt Study 1964'

Item 16299 41230865794 o.png

Fig. 21. 'The Dukeries Thinkbelt Study 2015'

The Atom US Study by William Cannady

Item 23630.png

Item 23631.png Item 23632.png
Item 23633.png Item 23634.png

These textual records demonstrate the possibility that Thinkbelts and Atoms might generate new cities.

• Table 8: Textual records indicating 'how' Thinkbelts and Atoms are linked.

Thus this article provides evidence to support its minor premise, namely:—

  • ... that 'Thinkbelts' are linked to 'Atoms'.

[edit] CONCLUSION

This article affirms its premises, namely:—

  1. ... that 'Atoms' are linked to 'Edukit'; and
  2. ... that 'Thinkbelts' are linked to 'Atoms'.

The conclusion therefore is:—

  • ... that 'Thinkbelts' are linked to 'Edukit'.

After Edukit, what would be next? A Global Thinkbelt?

Item 12913 23177671856 o.png

Back to Top


[edit] Appendix 1: EDUKIT

Item 23593 - Edukit spread.png

• 'Edukit spread' designed by Norman Fellows

nb The project gives due acknowledgement to the original conception.

  • "...if the state wished to discuss the total process of education for all its high schools in relation to nursery schooling on the one hand and to university education on the other, then a new metasystem logically beyond the first metasystem would be required. And in this case the question whether the second metasystem is not only logically but also constitutionally superior would arise. It would be discussed in those familiar terms about autonomy, about professional integrity, about bureaucratic interference, about synergy ... Such discussions would be less boring if we could get the logic right first."
  • (Stafford Beer, 1970)

[edit] Appendix 2: Preamble to Edukit

"The continuing design of autonomous universities by University Governors and their architects does not represent to me a particularly meaningful way of investing limited National resources. When seen as either a solution to the problem of education for all or a strategy for lifelong learning, the concept of "university", with its origins in the Middle Ages, now wears a firmly elitist look. Considering the amount of research, administrative and designers' time spent on bringing forth a new one, the university does little to prevent ignorance; gives little in the way of pleasure to students of all ages and cultures; does little to reduce the scarcity of the trained personnel who run the service within; is frequently found to be obsolescent upon completion and is usually difficult and expensive to throw away. All over the world, architects are engaged on buffing these absurd monuments to a design Utopia... meanwhile, skills shortages increase in the West, access is denied to the poor of the world, UNESCO declares illiteracy persists in parts of Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa... and millions drop out or become failures in spite of the university. I suggest that universities as we know them have outlived their social usefulness and that a strategic redistribution of financial resources is required if we are to receive the benefits of educational servicing that might reasonably be expected."

(Norman Fellows, 2019)

[edit] Appendix 3: EDUKIT PROPOSITIONS

  1. The provision of increased or new educational servicing should be taken as an opportunity for creating new industry and employment opportunities in those locations choosing to become Edukit subscribers.
  2. The increasing sophistication of electronic engineering and communication techniques should be realised as creating opportunities for home monitoring and educational servicing.
  3. The priorities in the provision of educational service facilities should be seen as personnel, equipment and buildings ... in that order.
  4. Educational servicing should exist primarily for student benefit and pleasure, not for the benefit of teaching, educational, administrative or design personnel.
  5. All design proposals concerning educational facilities supply should capitalise on the assumption that they will rapidly become obsolete and will therefore require ease of removal, modernisation, alteration or destruction.
  6. Any residential servicing requiring overnight stay away from home should be seen by the designer as a recreational and leisure opportunity. Non-residential servicing - i.e. follow-up, preventive, diagnostic, and learning facilities - should be as readily available as servicing at drive-in filling stations.

[edit] Appendix 4: EDUKIT CATALOGUE

  • In response to the propositions Edukit outlines a system of parts, divisible into four broad categories, which are either illustrated or symbolised in the accompanying illustrations. It is intended that Edukit could be applied anywhere in the UK or abroad. The service proposed would be available to everyone, as in the case of universal health care schemes, and both personnel and equipment would be supplied by Edukit. It is my intention to describe an integrated and comprehensive supply system as an alternative to the current concept of university. The work illustrated here is presented as a beginning ... I will appreciate any comments, particularly the hostile.
  • (ib.)

Item 19015 k.png

• Panel: 'Presenting Edukit catalogue' designed by Norman Fellows

[edit] Appendix 5: SOFT SERIES & COMPONENTS

Membership of Comsat

Access to Intelsat system: fast 2-way links to disaster servicing.

Item 23607.jpg

Learn More

Links to National Computer Grid

Teaching : Diagnosis : Records : Research

Item 23608.jpg

Learn More

Monitoring Module + components

Basic element. General use in home or teaching station. Specialised use as tutorial element. Monitoring central production and servicing. CCTV attachment. Usable on telephone lines.

Item 23610.jpg

Learn More

Information Kiosk

Street corner or drive-in location. Basic element in preventive system. Linked to neighbourhood centre or faculty.

Item 23613.png

Learn More

[edit] Appendix 6: MOBILE SERIES & COMPONENTS

Transporter units

Land, sea or air transporters used to ship major convoys or systems on educational or disaster missions.

Item 18108.png

Learn More

Small teams, sky-divers and para-educationalists

Advance party to check out Edukit supplies required. Also for direct delivery to difficult or damaged sites.

Item 20103.png

Mobile offices

Semi-private enclosures available to educational personnel or students. Used in classroom location.

Item 20103.png

[edit] Appendix 7: HARD SERIES & COMPONENTS

Powered wall panels Item 20103.png
A.C. Panel Item 20103.png
Retractable 'sky blind' Item 20103.png
Disposable space mixers Item 20103.png

[edit] Appendix 8: GENERAL SERIES & COMPONENTS

Food supply Item 20103.png

Games

Edukit proposes a set of international electronic games and simulator systems to be operable by students either mobile or based at home.

Item 18111.png

[edit] Notes

See World Map indicating the global imbalance in the provision of educational facilities in the existing system.

  1. Gaba, E. (2009) 'Fuller projection rotated.svg', Wikipedia.
  2. GENI (2013) 'Global Electric Energy Grid'.
  3. THE (2013) 'World University Rankings 2012-13', Times Higher Education.

[edit] Further Reading

Alexander, C. (1968) 'Systems Generating Systems', Architectural Design, December, pp. 605-610, on extremelyprovocative.

Clarke, A.C. (1945) 'Extra-terrestrial Relays', Wireless World, October.

Fellows, N. (1993) ‘Transcript – Interview of Cedric Price’, Archiblog on Google Drive.

Fellows, N. (1996) 'Transcript: Interview of Cedric Price (Extract 1)', Archiblog on Google Drive.

Fellows, N. (2015) ''The Fuller Challenge: My First Submission', Beyond Supercrit #1: CP: PTb, Blogger.

Fellows, N. (2016) 'Potteries Thinkbelt by Cedric Price', Blogger.

Fellows, N. (2016) 'Dukeries Thinkbelt', New Society, 2 June, WordPress.

Fellows, N. (2016) 'Dukeries Thinkbelt', Anticipatory Design, October, WordPress.

Fellows, N. (2019) 'Edukit: A fantasia of the stories behind it', DreamHost.

Fellows, N. (2019) 'Edukit', Anticipatory Design, October.

Fellows, N. (2020) 'Edukit: World Educational System', WordPress.

Fellows, N. (2020) 'CAMKOX', WordPress.

Fellows, N. (2020) 'Oxbridge Community College', WordPress.

Fellows, N. (2020) 'Edukit: World Educational System—Kit of Parts', DreamHost.

Fellows, N. (2020) 'Dukeries Thinkbelt', Vimeo.

Fellows, N. (2020) 'The Thinkbelt Now', Thinkbelt, Wordpress.

Fuller, R. B. (1962) 'Education Automation', Southern Illinois University Press.

Pask, G. (1969) 'The Architectural Relevance of Cybernetic, Architectural Design, September.

Price, C. (1966) 'Potteries Thinkbelt', New Society, 2 June, on Wordpress.

Price, C. (1966) 'Potteries Thinkbelt', October, Architectural Design, on Wordpress.

Price, C. et al. (1969) 'Non-Plan', 21 March, New Society.

Price, C. (1969) 'Non-Plan', Architectural Design, May.

Price, C. (1968) 'Atom: Design for New Learning for a New Town', Architectural Design, May, pp.232-235.

Price, C. (1984) 'Cedric Price: Works II', Architectural Association.

Tirrell, J.E. and Canfield, A.A. (1968) 'Goodbye to the Classroom', Architectural Design, May.

Velikov, K. (2015) 'Tuning Up the City - Cedric Price's Detroit Think Grid', ResearchGate.

Wikipedia (2023) 'Categorical proposition', Wikipedia.

Wikipedia (2023) 'Syllogism', Wikipedia.


[edit] Websites


Signature--Archiblog 16:56, 10 May 2023 (BST)


[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings


Designing Buildings Anywhere

Get the Firefox add-on to access 20,000 definitions direct from any website

Find out more Accept cookies and
don't show me this again