The benefits of investing in heritage at risk
|Deptford Railway Ramp, London Borough of Lewisham (Copyright Deptford Market Yard).|
In 2018, Historic England’s heritage at risk programme celebrated its 20th anniversary. Since 1998 the Heritage at Risk Register, published annually, has provided a snapshot of the health of our historic environment and helped focus resources on the most urgent and deserving cases. We know that tackling these sites – bringing them back into good repair and finding imaginative new uses – has the potential to deliver considerable public benefits, including opportunities for ‘place-making’.
There are challenges too. There are currently (2018) over 5,000 assets on Historic England’s Heritage at Risk Register nationally, from iron-age rampart walls to a mid-19th-century temporary iron mission church. Finding solutions to these sites requires a collaborative approach and the support of volunteers, local authorities, charitable organisations, private owners, funders and commercial developers alike.
In spring 2017 Historic England commissioned Lichfields to help quantify the economic, social and environmental benefits of investing in heritage at risk, with a focus on London. The purpose of the research was to help showcase the role and value of heritage in delivering good growth across the capital, and to ensure that heritage at risk has a robust policy hook both regionally and locally.
The research also helped to plug an important gap. The impact of investing in heritage is well documented at a national and regional level. The Heritage Lottery Fund’s ‘The Case for Heritage’ web pages and Historic England’s annual ‘Heritage Counts’ series are important examples. By comparison, analyses of local impact are much harder to come by, other than through the differing evaluation tools of individual funders.
Ten case studies were selected to reflect the diversity of successful heritage at risk projects in London – in respect of geographic location (inner/outer London); asset type (listed buildings/conservation areas/registered parks and gardens); ownership (public/private); and delivery vehicle (statutory action/grant funding). The chosen cases were all recent removals from the Heritage at Risk Register, where project information was more readily available.
Having selected the case studies, data was gathered from planning applications and project evaluation reports, supplemented with stakeholder interviews to provide a qualitative dimension. Lichfields applied its in-house Evaluate tool to each case study to estimate the economic, social and environmental impacts of each project – in other words, to measure the dividend that heritage-led regeneration can deliver.
The research painted a clear picture of the richness of regeneration outcomes which the repair and imaginative re-use of sites on the Heritage at Risk Register can offer, and the regeneration context to which they often contribute. Three examples serve to illustrate these points well.
Deptford railway ramp in south-east London comprises a series of 14 arches and a carriage ramp which was built to convey rolling stock to and from track level. The structure, built in 1832, is listed Grade II. It was added to the Heritage at Risk Register in 1997 after years of disuse. The site was bought from the local authority by developer U&I and redeveloped in 2012, the arches being put to use as independent shops, cafes, restaurants and a gym. The adjacent land has been redeveloped for residential use.
Alongside the repair and conservation of a heritage asset at risk, the project delivered 132 new homes. Other benefits included 88 direct jobs, an estimated £8.5 million a year economic output and £3.4 million a year resident expenditure. The site has made a significant contribution to the regeneration of Deptford by establishing a critical mass of leisure and retail activity at the south end of the High Street.
Wilton’s Music Hall
Wilton’s Music Hall in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, is the oldest surviving music hall in the world, first opened in 1859. It survived into the early 20th century as a soup kitchen under the ownership of the East London Methodist Mission, serving thousands of dockers’ families over a period of some 70 years. The building escaped demolition during the 1960s following a local campaign, although it remained vacant until the 1990s. Since then the building has gradually been restored with significant funding from the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF), and donations from the SITA Trust and the Foundation for Sports and Arts, among others.
The building has continued to host events in tandem with its restoration. On top of the 29 direct jobs and £1.2 million a year economic output identified through our analysis, the more gradual regeneration timetable has enabled a sustained programme of community, cultural and educational events. The 2016 HLF evaluation report lists a total of 450 volunteer days, 60 behind-the-scenes tours, two three-week building crafts placements, and three community weekends attended by 6,000 people.
Poplar Baths was constructed in 1933 to the designs of Harley Heckford. Grade II listed, it was built to provide washing facilities for the poor of the east end of London, replacing earlier Victorian baths. Poplar Baths was an early addition to the Heritage at Risk Register following its closure in 1986.
Thirty years later, in 2016, the building was finally removed from the register following a public-private scheme to transform the baths. The facilities were modernised with a 25-metre swimming pool, a new gym and a rooftop five-a-side football pitch. Garages to the rear were demolished to create 60 new affordable homes, with a further 40 units built on an adjacent site.
Together the 10 case studies show that tackling sites on Historic England’s Heritage at Risk Register can deliver an extraordinary diversity of regeneration outcome: economic outputs, employment and housing, community engagement and education, social opportunity, cultural activity and community pride.
Investing in such sites has direct and tangible impacts locally. It often means investing in cherished local landmarks, local distinctiveness and neighbourhood pride. In many cases these buildings and sites, once repaired, provide new venues and facilities for the local community.
Communities in need
Mapped against the 2015 indices of multiple deprivation we found that half of the 10 case studies fell within the most deprived 30 per cent of lower super output areas (LSOAs) nationally. This was broadly consistent with our findings for the 2017 London Heritage at Risk Register as a whole: some 49 per cent of the assets on the register were in the most deprived 30 per cent of neighbourhoods, with one in eight in the most deprived 10 per cent.
The findings present a clear picture for policymakers. Focusing heritage-led regeneration on those sites most at risk can help to target those places and communities in greatest need. Our research has shown that tackling sites at risk can be a catalyst for wider regeneration, contributing positively to good growth. Relatively small contributions can unlock transformational change and break cycles of blight caused by redundant and problematic buildings.
The findings clearly bolster the case for proactive and positive management of vulnerable historic buildings and sites, and for a sharper focus on heritage at risk within local plan-making. Indeed, despite the national policy requirement for local authorities to develop positive strategies to address heritage assets most at risk (NPPF, paragraph 126), in London only a few councils have explicitly addressed heritage at risk in their statutory development plans.
Our research recommended a more robust reference to heritage at risk at a regional level, and we are pleased that the draft London Plan includes the following reference: ‘where heritage assets have been identified as being at risk, boroughs should identify specific opportunities for them to contribute to regeneration and place-making, and they should set out strategies for their repair and re-use’ (policy HC1).
There is no doubt that finding successful solutions to sites on the Heritage at Risk Register requires both political and financial backing, and the dedication and imagination of a range of partners. Our publication ‘Risky Business?’ helps to demonstrate just how worthwhile this investment is. Heritage-led regeneration, with a focus on sites at risk, has the potential to deliver a very rich return.
This article originally appeared as ‘From risk to regeneration’ in IHBC’s Context 155, published in July 2018. It was written by Nick Bishop, senior heritage consultant at Lichfields, and Rebecca Barrett, principal adviser of the London Heritage at Risk team at Historic England.
Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Conservation area.
- Heritage at Risk Register.
- Heritage asset.
- Heritage at risk register.
- Heritage at risk register 2020.
- Historic England.
- IHBC articles.
- London plan.
- Marketing heritage assets.
- Nominating heritage assets.
- Plan making.
- What makes a heritage-at-risk officer.
The IHBC seeks to raise awareness and understanding of how building conservation philosophy and practice contributes towards meeting the challenge of climate change.
From Amenity Societies and Wentworth Woodhouse to Kurt Schwitters, Scotland’s Towns, Chester and more...
The former Royal High School building in Edinburgh is to be transformed into a £55 million national centre for music after the City of Edinburgh Council agreed to the lease of the historic property.
The joint-institute document aims to help maintain cultural heritage by providing a consistent framework across different sectors & geographies
IHBC’s Gus Astley Student Awards 2021: Win £500 and a place on IHBC’s 2022 Aberdeen School with your built environment/heritage coursework, closes 31/07!
The last remaining buildings on the site of the Harris meat factory family’s historic mansion are being restored to their former glory and converted into new homes.
The Construction Industry Coronavirus Forum (CICV Forum) has unveiled a new guide to the crucial and increasingly complex issue of professional indemnity insurance (PII).
ICOMOS has advised that the new football stadium proposal, if implemented, would have a completely unacceptable major adverse impact its authenticity and integrity.
Responding to the changing working patterns of a post-Covid Scotland, the Construction Scotland Innovation Centre (CSIC) has revealed new plans to help retrofit public spaces into out-of-town alternatives to city centre offices.
The free-to-access online issue mixes the topical and practical to explore how the sector can best adapt to digital innovation.