Last edited 01 Apr 2019

Main author

The Institution of Civil Engineers Institute / association Website

SuDS - is there light at the end of the tunnel?

Suds-urban-drainage 1.jpg
After over a decade of inaction, it looks like SuDS may be going mainstream. A recent ICE 'Design Sprint' workshop in Leeds looked at what could be done to encourage uptake. Landscape architect Bill Blackledge gives a personal view.

Contents

[edit] Introduction

Sustainable urban drainage (SuDS) is widely recognised as an essential part of the toolkit needed to make our cities liveable, even bearable, in the decades to come. Look out UK - 21°C in February?

The purpose of the ICE Design Sprint was to help make SuDS the norm, not the exception, but why was it even needed?

[edit] A brief history of UK SuDS

Following the devastating floods of 2007, the 2008 Pitt Review sought answers. The resulting 2010 Flood and Water Management Act (FWMA) set out Schedule 3 to overcome the biggest barrier to SuDS implementation - adoption.

During the course of the coalition government (2010 - 2014), Schedule 3 was consulted, delayed and dissipated, until finally, at the start of 2015, it was completely neutered.

In an effort to abolish any 'hindrances' to housebuilding, SuDS would not be required for developments of less than 10 houses and, in any case, only where "reasonably practical".

No standards or regulatory systems were created that might have forced any reconsideration of entrenched and blinkered attitudes. It provided a get-out for unwilling developers and their consultants, who were, and sadly largely still are, reluctant to do anything other than conventional piped drainage systems, with massive plastic tanks or hideous bomb craters at the low end.

There are, of course, some obvious pointers to better practice, and some shining examples of a better way. They tend to win awards, and are regarded as exceptions.

So, how can we make excellent SuDS more commonplace?

[edit] The ICE Leeds Design Sprint

The Sprint was just that, a quick dash through the issues around SuDS and how practical support might be encouraged.

It was an opportunity to talk with a wide cross-section of construction industry professionals, developers, local authority officers and industry experts to find common ground in our thinking.

The key aim was to find ways to make good SuDS (i.e. CIRIA design principles) the norm, not the exception.

Four teams were allocated a perspective from which to consider the issues: a family (affected by flooding but wary of SuDS features in a new development they were thinking about moving to); a lead local flood authority manager; a water and sewerage company asset manager, and a developer.

The common message to come from each team was that greater awareness - of climate change, water-related issues and the role of SuDS - could help to drive demand from the consumer end of the development chain.

In the same way that action on plastic waste has been driven by consumer reaction to hard-hitting messages (from the likes of David Attenborough), so consumers, together with people in all of the above roles, need to realise what we are facing and how to respond.

Participants initially made proposals in pairs, based on insights derived from one of the four perspectives; a total of 20 proposals were made at this stage.

One of the most interesting insights was that there's little incentive for housing developers to make the effort to implement SuDS (I won't say spend the extra money - enough studies have shown that SuDS are cost-neutral or cheaper than conventional approaches). Several proposals focused on this issue.

So, how about a rating scheme (like the well-established energy efficiency ratings A-G), which shows how well a particular development has embraced SuDS design? The parameters could be based on the key criteria of CIRIA 2015 - early implementation of SuDs in the design process, embracing water quality, water quantity, amenity and biodiversity.

Model for communication 2uds performance.jpg
A simple model for communicating SuDS performance, based on CIRIA principles

[edit] Is there light at the end of the tunnel?

Yes. Everyone can unite around CIRIA's excellent 2015 SuDS Design Manual, and the Leeds Design Sprint showed some of the ways this could be achieved.

There are some fabulous SuDS projects: Llanelli and London in the UK; China's headline-grabbing 'sponge cities'; ground-breaking US storm-water design (Portland); excellent Scandinavian, Dutch and German urban design - all globally promoting landscape-based SuDS as the way to create beautiful, resilient cities.

Scotland has long been ahead of the game, through SEPA and Sewers for Scotland (2007). The Welsh government has boldly implemented Schedule 3 of the FWMA – ready or not – just do it. Momentum is growing.

And what of England? 'Sewers for Adoption 8' (SfA8) is the closest we have to a real light at the end of the tunnel.

In the near future, due to an expanded definition of adoptable sewers to include SuDs features, this should provide a mechanism for adopting compliant SuDS assets. It doesn't sound glamorous, but it could be a critical step in finally making SUDs the norm, not the exception.

After a journey of more than a decade, full of setbacks and disappointments, are we nearly there? I think so.

[edit] About this article

This article was written by Bill Blackledge, Managing Director of 2B Landscape Consultancy and Vice Chair of the Landscape Institute Technical Committee. It first appeared on the website of the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) and can be accessed here.

[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki

[edit] External references

--The Institution of Civil Engineers