Retention in construction contracts
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
Retention is a percentage (often 5%) of the amount certified as due to the contractor on an interim certificate, that is deducted from the amount due and retained by the client. The purpose of retention is to ensure that the contractor properly completes the activities required of them under the contract.
In the US, this is known as Retainage.
Retention can also be applied to nominated sub-contractors, and the main contractor may also apply retention to domestic sub-contractors.
Half of the amount retained is released on certification of practical completion ('substantial completion' for Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) contracts) and the remainder is released upon certification of making good defects.
Interim certificates should make clear the amount of retention and a statement should also be prepared showing retention for nominated sub-contractors.
The contract may require that retention is kept in a separate bank account and that this is certified to contractors. In this case, the client will generally keep any interest paid on the account.
NB: On construction management contracts, a separate certificate of practical completion must be issued for each trade contract and so there are a number of defects liability periods. This means that retention must be released as required for each individual trade contract. The same is true on management contracts, where each works contract must be certified individually.
[edit] Reform
Retentions can be large amounts of money and may cause cash flow problems for contractors. It has even been suggested that retention clauses do not comply with the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act, which sets out requirements for the withholding of payments.
For more information, see The problems with retention.
A possible alternative to retention is a retention bond, where the client agrees to pay the amounts which would otherwise have been held as retention, but instead a bond is provided to secure the amount that would have been retained. As with retention, the value of the bond will usually reduce after practical completion has been certified.
Other proposals include putting retention in a trust account, and the construction supply chain payment charter proposing abolishing retention by 2025.
In 2014, Debbie Abrahams, MP said: “There is evidence that cash retentions have been used to shore up the working capital of local authorities and Tier 1 suppliers. There is a key concern that if Tier 1 suppliers become insolvent, the small businesses in the supply chain are at risk of losing their retentions.” (ref. Construction Enquirer 24 November 2014.)
[edit] 2017
In October 2017, the government published the Pye Tait review; Retentions in the Construction Industry, BEIS Research Paper 17. The review sought to assess the costs and benefits of retentions and alternative mechanisms. It found that the average retention was 4.8%.
The report found that reasons for non-payment or late payment of retentions included:
- Disputes over defects.
- Contractors becoming insolvent.
- Non-payment in a higher tier of the supply chain.
- Contractors not asking for their retention money, with some Tier 3 companies pricing work to offset the retention costs, and others keen to maintain good relationships with their main contractor.
This can result in higher overheads, poor relationships, constraints in growth and in some cases, insolvency.
Following the review, the government launched a consultation into 'the practice of cash retention under construction contracts'. (Ref. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/retention-payments-in-the-construction-industry)
[edit] 2018
In January 2018, following the collapse of Carillion, several main contractors backed a call to put an end to retention payments. Build UK, the Civil Engineering Contractors Association and the Construction Products Association provided a joint submission to the ongoing government consultation, stating that; 'The industry is fully committed to achieving zero cash retention and we believe that government must introduce legislation to ensure there is zero cash retention within the industry by no later than 2025.'
On Tuesday 9 January 2018 former chartered surveyor Peter Aldous MP introduced The Construction (Retention Deposit Schemes) Bill 2017-19 to Parliament under the Ten Minute Rule which would ensure that retentions are held in a third-party trust scheme.
[edit] 2019
In a surprising twist to the debate, in March 2019, housebuilder Persimmon announced it would allow homebuyers to hold back retentions until snagging issues are dealt with, to improve its reputation for quality and customer care.
In June 2019, Build UK published a set of minimum standards on the use of retention payments in the industry. Ref https://builduk.org/news/2019/06/build-uk-moves-forward-on-achieving-zero-retentions/
In December 2019, a consultation was launched regarding the ring-fencing of retentions in Scotland.
On December 9 2019, The Construction Leadership Council (CLC) endorsed the Build UK Roadmap to Zero Retentions. Ref http://www.constructionleadershipcouncil.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Press-Release-09_12_19.pdf
[edit] 2020
On 27 February 2020, in a debate in the House of Commons, in what has been seen as a backward step, Minister for Business and Industry Nadhim Zahawi siad: "It is important that any action we take is robust, proportionate and evidence based, which is where we are at the moment. Several policy options are under consideration, including the retention deposit scheme. It would be premature to commit to anything at this stage while several policy options are under consideration."
[edit] Alternatives
The Pye Tait Review suggested that alternatives to retentions might include:
- Project bank accounts.
- Retention bonds.
- Performance bonds.
- Escrow stakeholder accounts.
- Parent company guarantees.
- Retentions held in trust funds.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Bonds in construction contracts.
- Campaign for cash retentions reform.
- Certificate of making good defects.
- Construction (Retention Deposit Schemes) Bill 2017-19.
- Contingencies in construction.
- Contract sum.
- Defects in construction.
- Defects liability period DLP.
- ECA Survey: Industry remains optimistic despite downturn.
- Failure to complete construction works.
- Final account.
- Final certificate.
- Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act HGRA.
- Insolvency in the construction industry.
- Interim certificates in construction contracts.
- Liquidated damages in construction contracts.
- Performance bond for construction.
- Practical completion.
- Project bank account.
- Retention bond.
- Right to payment.
- Valuation of interim payments.
[edit] External references
Featured articles and news
Soil moisture content, construction and landscaping
The effects, of low and high rainfall on soil and buidlings.
Sustainability or sentimentality in the refurbishment sector.
Has the pendulum now swung too far ?
Negative impacts of political instability on projects
Expected by 64% of the respondents in nationwide survey.
BSRIA Market Intelligence Reports
World Building Automation and Control Systems (BACS) 2022
Statement of health and early intervention.
The importance of regular check-ups
And related links on DB.
Sustainable urban drainage systems SUDS
Rooflights, skylights, roof windows and Part L
Shedding some light on the new Building Regulations.
Interview with historic built environment surveyor.
Upgraded membership category now requires assessment.
The average kinetic energy of molecules
Temperature in buildings, explained on DB
Women and unequal pay in project management
Main barrier to entering the profession, new study reveals.
IHBC’s response to Parliamentary Committee
On Levelling-Up and Regeneration Bill.
Finalists for 2022 CIOB Awards revealed
Over 70 managers and organisations shortlisted for the 14 awards.
Types of building sensors on BD
From biometric to electrical current, chemical and more.
Government mandates detectors in rented homes
Changes are due to come into force on 1st October 2022.
80% of major government projects are rated red or amber
Heed advice and insight of this report IPA tells the government.
The end of the games but continued calls for action
From the Commonwealth Association of Architects.
Sustainable urban drainage systems SUDS
Comments
Is there actually going to be a reduction in the retention percentage after the agreed defect liability period is over?