Planning precedent
In the context of the UK planning system, the term ‘planning precedent’ refers to a past decision or a previous development proposal that has been approved by a planning authority. These decisions serve as examples or references that can influence future planning decisions.
Planning precedents establish a principle that can guide the decisions of planning authorities when evaluating new development proposals. If a similar proposal has been approved in the past, it can set a precedent that may make it more likely for similar proposals to be approved in the future, provided that the relevant circumstances and current planning polices and other considerations align.
However, it's important to note that planning precedents are not binding; they are simply cases that planning authorities may take into consideration when making decisions on new development applications. They can help provide consistency and predictability in the planning process by ensuring that similar cases are treated in a similar manner, promoting fairness and transparency.
The history of planning precedents in the UK is closely tied to the evolution of the planning system.
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries the need for organised land use and development control became apparent as urbanisation and industrialisation accelerated. Local authorities began to implement zoning and land use regulations. While the concept of planning precedents existed informally, there was no structured system for recording and referencing them.
After World War II, the UK faced significant challenges in terms of housing shortages and urban decay. The planning system played a crucial role in the post-war reconstruction efforts and the creation of new towns and the redevelopment of urban areas led to a growing body of planning precedents.
The 1947 Town and Country Planning Act marked the beginning of modern planning in the UK. The Act established the foundation for the planning system that still largely exists today. It introduced the concept of development plans, which were comprehensive documents that outlined land use policies and development guidelines for specific areas. Development plans became a central feature of the UK's planning system. These plans, created by local planning authorities, provided a framework for land use and development decisions. They often referenced past decisions and precedents to provide context and consistency.
As the planning system developed, the combination of legislation and case law helped shape the UK's planning landscape. The 1990 Town and Country Planning Act further emphasised the importance of planning precedents in decision-making. The 2012 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) emphasised the importance of consistency and transparency in decision-making and encouraged planning authorities to consider relevant planning precedents.
The UK's planning system continues to evolve, reflecting changing societal needs and priorities. The role of planning precedents remains crucial in providing guidance to planning authorities and ensuring a degree of predictability in the decision-making process. With the advent of digital technology, it has become easier to document and share planning precedents. Online databases, records, and case law repositories make precedents more accessible.
A key example of a case in the UK where planning precedent played a significant role was Newbury District Council v. Secretary of State for the Environment, often referred to as the "Newbury Bypass Case."
In the 1990s, the Newbury Bypass was proposed as part of the A34 road improvement scheme in southern England. The proposed bypass aimed to alleviate traffic congestion in the town of Newbury. However, the proposed route also cut through ecologically sensitive areas, including ancient woodlands and protected habitats, raising substantial environmental concerns.
A key aspect of the Newbury Bypass case was the consideration of Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council v. Secretary of State for the Environment, ex parte Hindmarsh (1987). In this earlier case, it was established that in certain circumstances, environmental factors could be given greater weight in planning decisions, even if the proposed development had economic or social benefits.
The Newbury Bypass case went through a series of legal challenges and inquiries. The planning inspector recommended that the bypass should be built, citing the economic benefits it would bring. However, the Secretary of State ultimately rejected the planning application, citing the significant environmental harm that would result from the proposed development.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
UK Infrastructure: A 10 Year Strategy. In brief with reactions
With the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority (NISTA).
Ebenezer Howard: inventor of the garden city. Book review.
The Grenfell Tower fire, eight years on
A time to pause and reflect as Dubai tower block fire reported just before anniversary.
Airtightness Topic Guide BSRIA TG 27/2025
Explaining the basics of airtightness, what it is, why it's important, when it's required and how it's carried out.
Construction contract awards hit lowest point of 2025
Plummeting for second consecutive month, intensifying concerns for housing and infrastructure goals.
Understanding Mental Health in the Built Environment 2025
Examining the state of mental health in construction, shedding light on levels of stress, anxiety and depression.
The benefits of engaging with insulation manufacturers
When considering ground floor constructions.
Lighting Industry endorses Blueprint for Electrification
The Lighting Industry Association fully supports the ECA Blueprint as a timely, urgent call to action.
BSRIA Sentinel Clerk of Works Training Case Study
Strengthening expertise to enhance service delivery with integrated cutting-edge industry knowledge.
Impact report from the Supply Chain Sustainability School
Free sustainability skills, training and support delivered to thousands of UK companies to help cut carbon.
The Building Safety Forum at the Installershow 2025
With speakers confirmed for 24 June as part of Building Safety Week.
The UK’s largest air pollution campaign.
Future Homes Standard, now includes solar, but what else?
Will the new standard, due to in the Autumn, go far enough in terms of performance ?
BSRIA Briefing: Cleaner Air, Better tomorrow
A look back at issues relating to inside and outside air quality, discussed during the BSRIA briefing in 2023.
Restoring Abbotsford's hothouse
Bringing the writer Walter Scott's garden to life.
Reflections on the spending review with CIAT.
Retired firefighter cycles world to raise Grenfell funds
Leaving on 14 June 2025 Stephen will raise money for youth and schools through the Grenfell Foundation.
Key points for construction at a glance with industry reactions.