- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 27 Apr 2018
Laing O'Rourke's offsite manufacturing facility in Steetley, Nottinghamshire is a huge space at 23,000 m2 – yet they have plans to build another one next door. This gives more than a hint about the growth and potential of offsite manufacture, although it's yet to become mainstream.
The Government has given £22m towards Laing O'Rourke's new factory so clearly it sees offsite manufacture as a solution.
The Construction Industry Council's Offsite Housing Review from February 2013 agrees, and found there is a massive opportunity to use it to deliver the new homes we badly need. The report identified potential benefits in a number of areas:
- Speed of production.
- Speed of build on site.
- Cost, quality and uniformity of build.
- Sustainability and waste reduction.
- Validation and testing.
- Health and safety.
 The factory
The Laing O'Rourke factory's main output is precast wall panels and modules. It also produces more bespoke items and a selection of outer-wall finishes to fit a variety of architects' demands, including a very convincing heritage brickwork effect. One impressive feature is the twin curing ovens (nicknamed the 'pizza ovens') that can get precast concrete slabs from pour to the back of a lorry within six hours.
On site there is a prototype two-storey, four-bedroom family home, made entirely from factory-manufactured components. This is by far the best offsite-manufactured home we have seen. However, further sustainability and cost research is needed, and the results shared widely, before we can draw real conclusions.
 Offsite manufacture in civil engineering
Despite many benefits, offsite manufacture has yet to become mainstream within infrastructure. Good examples do exist, such as Laing O'Rourke's DfMA (Design for Manufacture & Assembly) contracts to construct circular settlement tanks for sewage and water treatment plants. Laing O'Rourke will also be involved (subject to Final Investment Decision) in two aspects of the Hinkley Point C project:
- Construction workers' campus accommodation (which lends itself nicely to offsite manufacture optimisation).
- Civil construction of all the main power station buildings (though the extent to which offsite manufacture can be used for such complex projects remains to be seen).
 Benefits to nuclear construction
There are potentially huge gains to be made through using offsite manufacturing on nuclear sites. Working on the site itself can create delays (for example, waiting for security clearance for workers, or lorry deliveries) and problems can arise from limited access and space.
Offsite manufacture delivers better uniformity in finish, and testing and validation of product quality is easier in a factory. It remains to be seen to what extent a large, unique civil engineering project can be 'offsited', with the right motivated contractor in charge.
The blockers to offsite manufacture seem to include a high initial threshold to entry (factories costing £100m are a substantial outlay, and need regular work to make them economically feasible) and the extra time spent at the front-end design stage – i.e. working out how and where to amend the construction plan to accommodate this new method of construction.
This latter issue has the added complication that this interaction is already in flux, due to BIM Level 2, various procurement limitations and very little agreement as to who should do what, even in an 'industry norm' style contract. A deadline-driven client might not be willing to accept all of this and so the offsite solution could be neglected out of hand, unless the benefits are clearly stated.
Could it be that housing, often so traditional in mindset, is actually ahead of the curve and could teach the infrastructure world how to embrace offsite manufacturing?
This article originally appeared as Offsite manufacture – on the way to becoming mainstream?, published by the Institution of Civil Engineers on 17 August 2015. It was written by Charles Jensen.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- 3D concrete printer.
- 3D printing in construction.
- Advanced construction technology.
- Advanced manufacturing.
- Block planning.
- Crosswall construction.
- Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DfMA).
- Flying factory for construction works.
- Institution of Civil Engineers.
- Kit house.
- Modern methods of construction.
- Modular buildings.
- Off site materials.
- Offsite manufacturing and standardised design.
- Off-site prefabrication of buildings: A guide to connection choices.
- Samples and mock-ups.
- Temporary works.
- What does in situ mean?
Featured articles and news
The construction methods have changed a lot since the first roads were built around 4,000 BC.
How to deliver a five-fold multiplier effect from investment in water infrastructure.
RSHP's Leadenhall building is named a 2018 RIBA National Award winner.
Gary Neville's controversial Manchester tower gets the green light to go ahead.
Health and safety is everyone’s responsibility.
BSRIA guide to energy storage in buildings - a technology overview.
The UK’s largest Passivhaus accredited affordable housing scheme.
ICE set out 5 recommendations for the Government Construction Strategy 2018 update.
Balfour Beatty fined £500,000 for exposing workers to hand-arm vibration.
James Brokenshire launches a consultation on banning combustible cladding.
A year after Grenfell, we have a collection of 30 articles telling you everything you need to know.