- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 27 Oct 2020
A common application of hostile architecture is in relation to rough sleeping. Techniques used to discourage this include the use of ‘anti-homeless spikes’ - steel or concrete studs embedded in flat surfaces.
Other features that can be used include:
- Railings and other forms of enclosure
- Sloping surfaces.
- Embedded stones.
- Large round rocks.
- Protrusions on window ledges.
- Wave-shaped benches with central armrests to prevent people lying down
- Using uncomfortable stainless steel furniture.
- Sloping seats at bus stops.
Another activity that is often the target of hostile architecture is skateboarding. San Francisco, the city which gave rise to street skateboarding, was the first to introduce ‘pig’s ears’ – metal flanges bolted onto the corner edges of pavements and low walls to act as a deterrence.
Loitering can also be deterred, with a variety of techniques trialled around the world. In Shandong, China, a pay-per-minute system was introduced for use of its park benches. A series of studs would emerge suddenly from the seat when the occupant’s ‘paid-for’ time had elapsed. In Japan, sloped benches prevent people from leaning back, as well as tubular benches that are either too hot in summer or too cold in winter. New York has adopted a range of spiky anti-sit devices which are found on all manner of surfaces, from air-conditioning units, to fire hydrants and standpipes.
A technique that has been used by some local authorities and businesses to deter teenagers loitering is the Mosquito Alarm which emits a high-pitched sound that is inaudible to older people. A similar use of annoying local sounds can be used to prevent people standing in doorways or near the entrances to buildings.
Lighting can also be used to deter teenage loitering. Mansfield, Nottingham, installed neon pink lights in underpasses because of the way in which they highlight acne. Similarly, Tokyo has used blue lighting in some railway stations to try and alleviate the high suicide rate, blue being used for its soothing qualities.
Unsurprisingly, hostile architecture is controversial. Critics argue that it replaces public spaces with commercial or ‘pseudo-public’ spaces where contrarianism, or deviation from social conventions, is not allowed. Others argue that its use enforces and exacerbates already present social divisions.
According to the journalist Alex Andreou; ‘These measures do not and cannot distinguish the "vagrant" posterior from others considered more deserving. By making the city less accepting of the human frame, we make it less welcoming to all humans. By making our environment more hostile, we become more hostile within it.’
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- BREEAM Hard landscaping and boundary protection.
- Crime Prevention Design Advisor.
- Defensible space.
- Entry control.
- Living in the hyperreal post-modern city.
- Outbuildings security.
- Perimeter security.
- Public space intervention.
- Secured by design.
- Security and the built environment.
- Street furniture.
- Urban design.
Featured articles and news
Favoured in ancient settlements and garden cities but rejected in Circleville.
ICE seeks exceptional net zero projects.
Proper materials and maintenance can help reduce rust.
Is the construction sector responding to calls for ED&I?
Engineers pay tribute by sharing their memories.
The hidden price of infrastructure.
BREEAM incorporates wellbeing into its Building Back Better programme.
Administration signals policy changes on some building-related issues.
From inns and coaching houses to boutiques.
Survey reveals green skills gap.
America's economic collapse produced scores of PWA Moderne projects.