Gateways in building design and construction projects
As design and construction projects progress from inception through design and construction to completion and operation, it is crucial that the client retains control of the brief, the direction of development and costs.
Typically this is done by the introduction of key decision points, or gateways, at which the client assesses the state of development of the project and considers; whether it satisfies their strategic objectives, that it is affordable, that value is being delivered, and that risks are acceptable. They can then decide whether to progress to the next stage. If such a process is not introduced, there is a tendency for projects to gradually wander off course, with programme, budget and brief diverging.
There are a great number of different stages that gateways can be introduced, depending on the nature of the project, the practices of the client and the procurement route. A comparison of some standard stage definitions can be found in: Comparison of work stages.
Allowing the client to make decision about whether to proceed at gateways requires the preparation and submission of relevant information by the consultant team and contractors. As the project develops, this might include:
- Strategic brief.
- Preliminary business case.
- Project execution plan.
- Project brief.
- Concept design report.
- Detailed design report.
- Production information report.
- Tender report.
- Construction stage report.
- Final report.
- Assessment and lessons learned report.
It is important that appointment documents include a requirement for the project team members to prepare this information, and allocate responsibility for its co-ordination and compilation.
Consultants and contractors should not be permitted to proceed to the next stage until relevant information has been submitted and a decision made. It is important therefore that time is allowed within the project programme for the decision makers to be provided with relevant information, to assess it, discuss it and make a decision. This might involve meetings amongst senior members of the client team which might only be possible at specific dates. This decision making process should therefore be carefully planned and should not appear on a programme as a simple milestone with no sensible time allocation.
It is possible that the client will decide not to proceed, or will ask for further work to be carried out, whether this is revision of the design, or undertaking value management exercises to re-align proposals with the available budget. Value management is a team-based approach used to define the client's objectives and ensure that best value, whole-life solutions are selected to satisfy those objectives.
Decisions to proceed may be accompanied by the introduction of change control procedures, freezing certain aspects of the project. This ensures that approved aspects of the project are not changed without the express permission of the client. Changes to a project may have impacts on time, cost or quality. Broadly, the later in the development of a project that changes occur, the greater those impacts are likely to be.
Examples of the introduction of change control procedures might include:
- At the end of the concept design stage if the project is tendered at this stage (for example on a design and build project).
- At the end of the concept design stage, when the project brief might be frozen.
- During the detailed design stage when the detailed design, technical design and specification are finalised.
- During the tender stage when the tender documentation has been prepared.
- When the contractor is appointed and any further changes may qualify as variations.
See change control for more information.
With the introduction of building information modelling, the submission of material at gateways (sometimes referred to as employer's decision points) may also include data drops to ensure building information models are properly validated and controlled as they develop. Data is extracted from the evolving model and submitted to the client to ensure it reflects the level of detail that the project should have reached by that stage. The client will also check the data in terms of technical compliance, compliance with the brief, cost, and so on (the government also suggests ‘carbon’). See data drops for more information.
The OGC Gateway Review process offers a structure for publicly-funded projects, based around a series of independent peer reviews carried out at key stages to verify that projects should be allowed to progress to the next stage. These peer reviews, or 'gateway reviews' are commissioned on a confidential basis by the Senior Responsible Owner and are defined as:
- OGC gateway review 0: strategic assessment.
- OGC gateway review 1: business justification
- OGC gateway review 2: delivery strategy (or procurement strategy)
- OGC gateway review 3: investment decision
- OGC gateway review 4: readiness for service
- OGC gateway review 5: operations review & benefits realisation (or benefits evaluation)
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Change control procedure.
- Comparison of work stages
- Data drops.
- Employer's decision point (BIM)
- Employers information requirements.
- End of stage report.
- Governance for Railway Investment Projects (GRIP).
- Level of detail.
- Project lifecycle for major road projects.
- Risk management.
- Value management.
Featured articles and news
What will the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) mean for you when they come into force in May?
Business Secretary chairs a new taskforce to monitor and advise on mitigating the impacts of Carillion’s liquidation.
Sir John Armitt is appointed the new chair of the National Infrastructure Commission.
High quality and high density homes - is it what we need or is it storing up trouble?
Government announces its intention to strengthen planning rules to protect music venues and neighbours.
National Audit Office reports that there is little evidence that PFI offers better value than other forms of contracting.
What is liquidation and how does it apply to contractors in the construction industry?
Scrutiny is placed on Carillion's controversial 2013 decision to extend subcontractor payment terms to 120 days.
RSHP unveil their involvement in a boundary crossing which will provide a new entry point into Hong Kong.
With PFI currently under the spotlight due to Carillion, this introductory article explains what they are.
Estimates suggest that up to 30,000 small firms could be at risk of non-payment as a result of Carillion's collapse.