Decision making process for construction projects
Typically, the client will be the ultimate decision maker on construction projects, as they will generally have instigated and will be paying for the project and are likely to have a long-term interest in it after the design and construction process has been completed.
However, the client is rarely a single person, even on relatively small projects and the client organisation is likely include a number of groups or individuals with an interest in, responsibility for or control over the project.
Depending on the complexity and size of the project, and whether the client is in the public or private sector, the levels of decision makers within the client organisation might be structured as follows:
- Main board of directors / Investment decision maker
- Project director / Senior responsible owner
- Board representative / Project sponsor
- Project board.
- User panels.
- Champions.
- Project managers
For more information see: Client.
However, there may be other parties with an interest in the project that may be involved in the decision-making process. This might include:
- Funders and shareholders.
- Insurers.
- The local authority.
- Other statutory authorities and non-statutory consultees.
- The emergency services.
- User groups.
For more information see: Stakeholders and Third-party dependencies.
These parties may not all have the same objectives or views and so it is important that a clear management strategy is in place to ensure that the right information is available at the right time to ensure the right people are able to make the right decisions. Building information modelling is seen as one of the tools that can help ensure this happens. For more information see: Building information modelling.
Typically the decision making process itself will involve passing through a number of key decision points, or gateways, at which the client assesses the state of development of the project and considers; whether it satisfies their strategic objectives, that it is affordable, that value is being delivered, and that risks are acceptable. They can then decide whether to progress to the next stage.
Allowing the client to make decision about whether to proceed at gateways requires the preparation and submission of relevant information by the consultant team, contractors and other suppliers. Decisions may also involve expert assessment and advice from client representatives, independent client advisers, project managers, or even external bodies (such as external design reviews).
It is possible that the client will decide not to proceed, or will ask for further work to be carried out, whether this is revision of the design, or undertaking value management exercises to re-align proposals with the available budget.
Decisions to proceed may be accompanied by the introduction of change control procedures, freezing certain aspects of the project. This ensures that approved parts of the project are not changed without the express permission of the client.
For more information see: Gateways and change control.
An detailed description off the process for securing information and making decision for a number of different procurement routes is available at: Project plans.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.
Featured articles and news
Plumbing and heating for sustainability in new properties
Technical Engineer runs through changes in regulations, innovations in materials, and product systems.
Awareness of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
What CBAM is and what to do about it.
The new towns and strategic environmental assessments
12 locations of the New Towns Taskforce reduced to 7 within the new towns draft programme and open consultation.
Buildings that changed the future of architecture. Book review.
The Sustainability Pathfinder© Handbook
Built environment agency launches free Pathfinder© tool to help businesses progress sustainability strategies.
Government outcome to the late payment consultation, ECA reacts.
IHBC 2025 Gus Astley Student Award winners
Work on the role of hewing in UK historic conservation a win for Jack Parker of Oxford Brookes University.
Future Homes Building Standards and plug-in solar
Parts F and L amendments, the availability of solar panels and industry responses.
How later living housing can help solve the housing crisis
Unlocking homes, unlocking lives.
Preparing safety case reports for HRBs under the BSA
A new practical guide to preparing structural inputs for safety cases and safety case reports published by IStructE.
Male construction workers and prostate cancer
CIOB and Prostate Cancer UK encourage awareness of prostate cancer risks, and what to do about it.
The changed R&D tax landscape for Architects
Specialist gives a recap on tax changes for Research and Development, via the ACA newsletter.
Structured product data as a competitive advantage
NBS explain why accessible product data that works across digital systems is key.
Welsh retrofit workforce assessment
Welsh Government report confirms Wales faces major electrical skills shortage, warns ECA.
A now architectural practice looks back at its concept project for a sustainable oceanic settlement 25 years on.
Copyright and Artificial Intelligence
Government report and back track on copyright opt out for AI training but no clear preferred alternative as yet.
Embedding AI tools into architectural education
Beyond the render: LMU share how student led research is shaping the future of visualisation workflows.
Why document control still fails UK construction projects
A Chartered Quantity Surveyor explains what needs to change and how.
Inspiration for a new 2026 wave of Irish construction professionals.
New planning reforms and Warm Homes Bill
Take centre stage at UK Construction Week London.

























