Making energy calculations more accurate with HQM
When developers and assessors start using HQM, one of the first things they look at is how their projects are doing in energy. This isn’t surprising seeing as it’s the issue with most credits. And it’s an easily quantifiable aspect of sustainability that can be assigned a cost. As with all the issues in the “My Home” section of Home Quality Mark, it works alongside the “Delivery” (previously Knowledge Sharing) section to ensure that the design is delivered to the occupants of the home (see how HQM recognises delivery and quality, here). The benefits of energy efficiency are also clear; lower carbon, lower running costs for consumers and healthier homes that keep us warm throughout the year (when also combined with measures to prevent uncomfortably warm temperatures in summer, of course!).
SAP is the calculation methodology to show compliance against the minimum standards of Building Regulations. HQM recognises performance that is above these minimum standards, and we want to provide a greater level of accuracy to the consumer and others using the scheme (such as the financial sector, planners and more). To do this, the calculation methodology needs to be different, as it is doing a different job. At the same time, we also don’t want to add significant burden on developers, by making them complete a new calculation from scratch.
We are currently consulting on the next version of Home Quality Mark, with regards to improving the accuracy of the calculation. The main change we are proposing is;
 Uses local weather conditions
HQM uses localised weather data to more accurately reflect the effects of weather on a home’s energy performance, compared to SAP, which uses a national average. Weather is one thing we can’t control when it comes to buildings, so this is important for producing an accurate calculation.
As HQM’s energy methodology is a variation of BREDEM, it means additional inputs can be added to improve the accuracy of the calculations. Using EU energy labels for appliances and details of light fittings that are actually installed, HQM acknowledges the benefits of low-energy products and gives a more realistic scenario based on the design details of the home. If this information isn’t available, default assumptions are made because even if they aren’t specified by the developer, they will be installed once occupants move in.
This is an adapted version of the triple-metric approach used by BREEAM, which benefits from over 25 years of experience and knowledge of the worldwide assessment methodology for sustainable development.
Energy efficiency and energy costs are not the same thing. The costs that consumers are charged in-practice can vary significantly, depending on the systems in place (e.g. heating and hot water), even if they are relatively efficient.
An HQM rating gives consumers and personal finance organisations, a way of comparing individual homes, including their energy efficiency and expected running costs. Energy performance of the home is therefore based on the individual home, as with Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs), instead of an average, which is allowed for compliance with Building regulations Part L, when assessing multiple homes in some cases.
We believe that lots of small changes can have an overall big impact, so HQM awards credits on a scaled approach across the scheme. For energy, HQM awards some credits for performance slightly beyond Building Regulations ‘notional dwelling’ all the way up to 100% improvement over regulation baselines and beyond, to recognise homes that off-set their regulated and unregulated energy use with low and zero carbon technologies.
HQM therefore recognises improvements in energy performance, all the way up to the few projects currently able to achieve best-practice zero carbon levels. We expect these standards to evolve over time, to recognise improvements and innovations made in industry and with low and zero carbon technologies.
Where these areas are present, HQM incorporates them in its energy calculation to give a holistic evaluation of the whole building and the assessed home’s relative energy usage associated with these spaces.
 It’s owned by BRE
 Streamlining the assessment
By removing the ‘foundation route’ option, we are proposing to simplify how credits are calculated and make outputs from HQM more comparable. If inputs for lighting, appliances and water heating aren’t available, appropriate defaults will be automatically assumed.
And HQM already helps to streamline assessment by:
We’ve worked with SAP software providers so where their software is recognised by us (Elmhurst, FSAP, NHER), they can produce XML outputs that feed directly into our own HQM assessment tool. This means HQM assessors don’t have to do loads of extra work to use the HQM energy methodology because it starts with SAP, which is required for all new homes as part of complying with Building Regulations anyway.
 Using the HQM engine to help calculate high temperature risk
Again, building on the inputs already required by SAP, the HQM energy methodology can be used to calculate credits in the ‘Temperature’ assessment issue. This provides a first-pass risk assessment as to whether prevention measures or dynamic simulation modelling are needed, and builds on Appendix P in SAP (overheating). This provides a more comprehensive evaluation of overheating risk by considering factors that aren’t already included in SAP, such as local environment and potential barriers to natural ventilation (e.g. noise or security risks).
If you want to find out more about how HQM ONE is improving standards, to keep ahead of the curve and help shape the scheme before consultation closes (on 9th of February, 2018), see here for more details: http://www.homequalitymark.com/HQMONEconsultation
We’d really like to hear your thoughts!
 The BRE Domestic Energy Model (BREDEM) is a methodology for calculating the energy use and fuel requirements of dwellings based on their characteristics. It is suitable for use in research work, such as stock modelling. It shares some features with the SAP methodology, but allows users to adjust inputs which are fixed in SAP, making it better suited to certain analysis tasks. See here for more info: https://www.bre.co.uk/page.jsp?id=3176
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Issue support documents
|These are Multiple Author Articles - click on them and add to them today. It's easy.|
You can also add to General Multiple Author Articles here
Issue support documents are written for named BREEAM Issues or sub-issues. More info. (ac) = awaiting content
|Thanks to our Knowledge Sharing Ambassadors for a lot of this content|
- BREEAM Sustainability champion
- BREEAM Environmental management
- BREEAM Considerate construction
- BREEAM Monitoring of construction site impacts
- BREEAM Aftercare support
- BREEAM Seasonal commissioning
- BREEAM Testing and inspecting building fabric
- BREEAM Life cycle cost and service life planning
- BREEAM Stakeholder consultation (ac)
- BREEAM Commissioning (ac)
- BREEAM Handover (ac)
- BREEAM Inclusive and accessible design (ac)
- BREEAM Post occupancy evaluation
 Health and Wellbeing
- BREEAM Visual comfort Daylighting (partly ac)
- BREEAM Visual comfort View out
- BREEAM Visual comfort Glare control
- BREEAM Indoor air quality plan
- BREEAM Indoor air quality Ventilation
- BREEAM Thermal comfort
- BREEAM Internal and external lighting (ac)
- BREEAM Indoor pollutants VOCs (ac)
- BREEAM Potential for natural ventilation (ac)
- BREEAM Safe containment in laboratories (ac)
- BREEAM Acoustic performance
- BREEAM Safety and security (ac)
- BREEAM Reduction of energy use and carbon emissions
- BREEAM Energy monitoring
- BREEAM External lighting
- BREEAM Low carbon design
- BREEAM Passive design
- BREEAM Free cooling
- BREEAM LZC technologies
- BREEAM Energy efficient cold storage (partly ac)
- BREEAM Energy efficient transportation systems
- BREEAM Energy efficient laboratory systems
- BREEAM Energy efficient equipment (partly ac)
- BREEAM Drying space
- BREEAM Transport assessment and travel plan
- BREEAM Public transport accessibility
- BREEAM Sustainable transport measures
- BREEAM Proximity to amenities
- BREEAM Cyclist facilities
- BREEAM Alternative modes of transport (ac)
- BREEAM Maximum car parking capacity
- BREEAM Travel plan
- BREEAM Home office (ac)
- BREEAM Water consumption
- BREEAM Water efficient equipment
- BREEAM Water monitoring
- BREEAM Water leak detection (ac)
- BREEAM Hard landscaping and boundary protection
- BREEAM Responsible sourcing of materials
- BREEAM Insulation
- BREEAM Designing for durability and resilience
- BREEAM Life cycle impacts
- BREEAM Material efficiency (ac)
- BREEAM Construction waste management
- BREEAM Recycled aggregates
- BREEAM Speculative floor & ceiling finishes
- BREEAM Adaptation to climate change
- BREEAM Operational waste
- BREEAM Functional adaptability (ac)
 Land Use and Ecology
- BREEAM Site Selection
- BREEAM Ecological value of site
- BREEAM Protection of ecological features
- BREEAM Minimising impact on existing site ecology
- BREEAM Enhancing site ecology
- BREEAM Long term impact on biodiversity (ac)
- BREEAM Impact of refrigerants
- BREEAM NOx emissions
- BREEAM Flood risk management (ac)
- BREEAM Surface water run-off (ac)
- BREEAM Reduction of night time light pollution (partly ac)
- BREEAM Reduction of noise pollution
Once an ISD has been initially created the '(ac)' marker can be removed
This particular index is based around the structure of the New Construction and RFO schemes.