- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 22 Nov 2020
Damp-proof course DPC
Damp in buildings can cause a number of serious problems, such as:
- Damp patches.
- Mould growth, which is a cause of respiratory allergies.
- Mildew, salts, staining and ‘tide marks’.
- Damage to surface finishes.
- Corrosion and decay of the building fabric.
- Slip hazards.
- Frost damage.
- Poor performance of insulation.
- Damage to equipment, or electrical failure.
Rising damp is caused by capillary action drawing moisture up through the porous elements of a building’s fabric. Rising damp, and some penetrating damp, can be caused by faults to, or the absence of a damp-proof course (DPC) or damp-proof membrane (DPM).
A damp-proof course is a barrier, usually formed by a membrane built into the walls of a property, typically 150 mm above ground level, to prevent damp rising through the walls. Historically, damp-proof courses may have been formed using bitumen, slates, lead, pitch, asphalt or low absorption bricks. They emerged during the Victorian era and are commonly found in buildings from around 1900.
Damp-proof courses are now required in the construction of new buildings to prevent rising damp and in some situations to prevent penetrating damp. Approved document C of the Building Regulations, Site preparation and resistance to contaminants and moisture, suggests that a damp-proof course may be a, ‘…bituminous material, polyethylene, engineering bricks or slates in cement mortar or any other material that will prevent the passage of moisture.’
- Continuous with any damp-proof membrane in the floor.
- At least 150 mm above the level of the adjoining ground if it is in an external wall.
- If it is in an external cavity wall, the cavity should extend at least 225 mm below the damp-proof course, or a cavity tray should be provided with weep holes every 900 mm so that water running down the cavity cannot pass to the inner leaf.
A damp-proof course may also be required:
- In masonry walls below a coping, where the coping is constructed from a material that is not impervious to water.
- In the joints between walls and door and window frames.
- In suspended timber ground floors between the timber and materials that can carry moisture from the ground.
The absence of a damp-proof course in older buildings can be rectified by creating a moisture-impermeable layer, either by the insertion of a damp-proof course, or by the injection of water-repellent chemicals. Treatment generally also involves remedial work to any corroded or decayed elements of the building fabric, as well as hacking off and replacing existing plaster to a height of 1 m.
However, damp in older buildings is actually often caused by a leak or a defect in the wall construction, such as a cracking, rather than by rising damp, and this may not be rectified by the insertion of a damp-proof course. It is important therefore that any defects are identified and corrected first before accepting the cost and disruption of inserting a damp-proof course.
Where it is not possible to insert a damp-proof course 150 mm above the external ground level, for example if the building has a solid external wall and the internal floor level is less than 150 mm above the external ground level, external drainage solutions may be necessary, such as the installation of a french drain.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Breather membrane.
- Building damp-free cavity walls.
- Cavity tray.
- Cavity wall.
- Chemical injected DPC.
- Cold bridge
- Damp proof membrane.
- Defects in brickwork
- Defects in stonework.
- Dew point.
- French drain.
- Frost attack.
- Glass bottle floor foundation.
- Interstitial condensation.
- Penetrating damp.
- Rising damp.
- Rising damp in walls - diagnosis and treatment (DG 245).
- Sleeper wall.
- Vapour barrier.
- Wall ties.
- Wall tie failure.
- Weep hole.
Featured articles and news
Retirement community harmonises old buildings with new structures.
Defended Scapa Flow from WWII attacks, but now battered by rising sea levels.
The real economic impact of historic preservation.
None have anything to do with maths, physics or science!
Report includes sales vs production of compressors by type.
Government announces latest plans for growth.
Will the new requirements - once passed - go far enough?
These post-WWII modular buildings were unpopular, yet ubiquitous.
What's the verdict from the court of public opinion?
Shift to home-based work influences closed plan preferences.
An overview of the current state of the market.
Organisation offers best practices for construction and modification.
Heritage on the edge?
Prioritising tax considerations.