- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 03 Nov 2021
There are a very wide range of construction methods available, however, bridge foundations constructed in water will usually involve the use piers or abutments. Scour is an engineering term used to describe what happens when holes (also known as scour holes) are caused by active water currents that occur around bridge piers or abutments. When severe erosion of the material at the base of the supporting structure takes place, scour can lead to structural failure of the bridge.
When bridge foundations are put into place into riverbeds or streams, the piers and abutments will often cause the water to move faster - creating contraction scour and altering the water’s flow. Over time, this change in flow can trigger degradation scour of the underlying surface, resulting in erosion that can lower the river bed or stream bed.
Piers and abutments are not the only things that can create changes in water currents that result in scour. If debris collects under a bridge or around its foundations, this can also create local scour. While this may not directly affect the structural integrity of the bridge, it can generate scour elsewhere and trigger a negative chain reaction as a result of the redirected water flow.
Loose soil usually causes the most common problems associated with bridge scour. However, man-made changes to the surrounding environment as a result of urbanisation can also trigger scour. The demand for natural resources and the increase in human activity (including debris) can alter water levels and currents. Flooding can also result in scour.
There have been many laboratory experiments devoted to establishing equations that can calculate scour. Piers and abutments are central to some of the studies, along with types of sediment, water flow rates and so on.
Work by hydrologists and hydraulic technicians in this area is important, since it can determine the viability of a bridge placed in certain locations. On site inspections record river flow and other geological details.
For existing structures, measurements are gathered and bridges are ranked based on their scour risk. This may result in the creation of a scour plan of action that includes monitors or sensors along with precautions to take if the safety of the bridge becomes compromised.
In the United States, Hydraulic Engineering Circular 18 (HEC-18) provides documentation that outlines best practices for the design, evaluation and inspection of bridges for scour. There are also two supplementary documents: Stream Stability at Highway Structures (HEC-20) and Bridge Scour and Stream Instability Countermeasures (HEC-23).
Published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), these manuals include additional information about estimating scour depth. However, there is some research that questions the reliability of HEC-18 due to its use of sand sediment and not other more commonly found soil materials such as compact till, stiff clay and shale.
There are several techniques to prevent (or at least reduce) the occurrence of scour.
This term describes large stones, concrete blocks or even construction debris placed by engineers on shorelines that are adjacent to bridges. This is the most common form of scour remediation, although it is not deemed entirely reliable by the Federal Highway Administration under HEC-18 and 23.
 Training structures (spur dikes, barbs, groynes, vanes)
Bridge scour is an ongoing issue and a major cause of bridge failure. In the United States it is estimated that more than half of bridge failures are caused (at least partially) by scour. It is the most common cause of highway bridge failure in the country.
In October 1987, a tragic incident took place in Wales. Scour as a result of significant flooding resulted in the collapse of the Glanrhyd railway bridge, causing a train to fall into the River Towy. Three passengers and three crew members were able to escape, but there were four fatalities, including the train's driver and three passengers. Following this incident railway bridge inspection practises were revised.
- June 2002: The Lower Ashenbottom viaduct in Lancashire (caused by torrential rain).
- Summer 2009: Seven road and foot bridges in Cumbria (due to flooding), resulting in one fatality.
- Assessing bridges.
- Braced frame.
- Bridge construction.
- Bridge structures.
- Civil engineer.
- On the road to ruin - How America's infrastructure is failing.
- Pile foundations.
- Prestressed concrete.
- Railway engineering.
- River engineering.
- Structural engineer.
- Underwater foundations.
Featured articles and news
Or are you capping.
Digital gaming competition for UK students aged 16 to 18.
Heritage protection in England vs Australia.
Three-quarters of fire doors fail inspections
The role of geoparks, biospheres and world heritage sites.
Just one month to go ! Find out more here.
A new gallery for the University of Huddersfield.
What will it take to stop it ?
To celebrate world bee day 2022 !
Not forgetting part F and the new part overheating part O.
As energy prices jump up in cost.
With people in the UK from Ukraine.
Industry leader Steve Murray takes on role.
An abundant and versatile building material.
600,000 heat pump installations targeted per year by 2028.
Helping prevent those unwanted outcomes.
How has transport changed due to Covid-19 ?
Will you need it ? after June 15 and the new Part O ?
Create an account and write the first of many articles.
CIAT commentary after the first meeting.
Who is to blame?
Research recommends focussing on portfolio success rather than project success.