- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 13 Mar 2019
Adversarial behaviour in the UK construction industry
The construction industry is often described as being ‘adversarial’, that is, it frequently involves conflict, opposition, confrontation, dispute and even hostility. Indeed, in her autobiography 'Open Secret', published in 2002, Stella Rimmington, the former Director General of MI5, wrote; '...the Thames House Refurbishment was fraught with difficulties. It was clear that dealing with the building industry was just as tricky as dealing with the KGB.'
- Alfred Bossom’s book ‘Building to the Skies: The Romance of the Skyscraper’, published in 1934, was one of the first major criticisms of the performance of the UK construction industry. Bossom described an adversarial and wasteful industry in which construction took too long, was too expensive and was not satisfactory for its clients.
- The 1964 Banwell Report ‘The placing and management of contracts for building and civil engineering works’ recommended that the industry should develop less adversarial relationships.
- In his In 1994 report 'Constructing the Team' Sir Michael Latham notoriously described the construction industry, as; ‘ineffective’, ‘adversarial’, ‘fragmented’ and ‘incapable of delivering for its customers’.
- ‘Modernising Construction: Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General’, published by the National Audit Office in 2001 pointed to a ‘…tendency for an adversarial relationship to exist between construction firms, consultants and their clients and between contractors, sub-contractors and suppliers’.
 How adversarial relationships have developed
There are a number of reasons for the adversarial nature of the industry:
- Construction projects tend to be one-offs. The project team may not have worked together before, they may not have worked on this sort of project before, and may not have time to build trust.
- Construction projects involve conflicting requirements and the co-ordination and integration of a great deal of complex information, procedures and systems.
- The industry is divided into a large number of professional ‘silos’ with little cross-discipline integration or collaboration.
- The traditional procurement route separates the client, designers, contractors and suppliers, with only legally-defined, bilateral contractual relationships between them.
- The supply chain has become more complicated and extended, leading to a greater number of contracts and so a greater chance of conflict.
- There is a tendency to use the UK legal system (which is inherently adversarial) to resolve disputes, rather than informal collaborative methods.
- Some traditional forms of contract are written in a way that is adversarial in nature, and they may only be referred to when problems arise.
- Lowest-cost bidding results in very small margins throughout the supply chain, and the successful bidders may then try to improve their financial position by making claims.
- There can be an inappropriate or unfair allocation of risk between the parties to contracts.
- The adoption of fast track construction techniques has left little margin for error and this can lead to disputes when problems arise.
- Inertia is prevalent in the industry and embedded cultural behaviours are difficult to change.
 Possible solutions
A number of collaborative practices have been developed, providing mechanisms that encourage the project team to work together, rather than against one another, sharing risk and knowledge, facilitating collective learning and building trust:
The Latham Report, recommended greater ‘partnering’ to combat the adversarial nature of the industry. Partnering is a broad term used to describe a collaborative management approach that encourages openness and trust. The parties to a contract become dependent on one another for success and this requires changes in culture, attitude and procedures throughout the supply chain.
Partnering is most commonly used on large, long-term or high-risk contracts. However, it can become a paper exercise unless there is proper buy-in throughout the supply chain, and ‘cosy’, inefficient relationships can develop. There is also some criticism that large partnering contracts can exclude smaller companies and so may hamper innovation.
For more information see: Partnering.
NEC was first published in 1993 as the New Engineering Contract. It is a suite of construction contracts intended to promote partnering and collaboration between the contractor and client and was developed as a reaction to other more adversarial, traditional forms of construction.
For more information see: NEC.
Construction is also subject to statutory schemes which impose adjudication procedures in the absence of an appropriate contractual agreement, such as the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 and the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009.
For more information see: Alternative dispute resolution.
For more information see: Selection criteria.
The term ‘integrated supply team’ refers to the integration of the complete supply chain involved in the delivery of a project, including the main contractor, designers, sub-contractors, suppliers and so on. Providing services as one entity, rather than a plethora of disparate suppliers, creates a single point of responsibility for the delivery of a project, and binds the suppliers together to achieve a common objective.
For more information see: Integrated project team.
The Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 includes provisions to ensure that payments are made promptly throughout the supply chain.
Other fair payment practices include; publication of payment practices, project bank accounts, transparency regarding payment procedures throughout the supply chain, fair payment charters, proper release of retention, prevention of ‘pay when paid’ practices and so on.
For more information see: Fair payment practices.
 Other collaborative practices.
- Clear lines of communication and authority.
- Clear contract documents.
- Careful record keeping.
- Strict change control procedures.
- Early contractor involvement.
- Early engagement with suppliers.
- Co-location of team members and regular social activities.
- Regular workshops and team meetings.
- Problem resolution procedures based on solutions not blame.
- Early warning procedures.
- Collaborative design tools such as building Information modelling.
- Clash avoidance.
- Allocation of risks to those best able to control them.
- Open book accounting.
- Effective stakeholder management.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki,
- Alternative dispute resolution.
- BS11000 Collaborative business relationships
- Building Information modelling.
- Change control procedures.
- Clash avoidance.
- Collaborative practices.
- Collaboration: a quality management perspective.
- Conflict avoidance.
- Early contractor involvement.
- Early warning.
- Fair payment practices.
- Integrated project team.
- Integrated supply team.
- Latham Report.
- Open book accounting.
- Selection criteria.
Featured articles and news
From alabaster to travertine – how many types do you know?
Well-designed lighting helps maintain a healthy physiological and psychological balance.
Transferring the risk for obtaining the target BREEAM rating.
A simple but effective way to determine the root cause of an issue.
BSRIA report suggest the European market will double to 415 million Euros by 2023.
Why a wellbeing strategy is vital for property managers.
An ECA briefing for members about the commercial implications of leaving the EU.
A crucial moment on any project - and fraught with danger.
The performance gap from a Northern Ireland perspective.
Book review: Buildings of protestant nonconformity.
Design and testing for health and wellbeing - free download from BRE.