Banwell Report
Commissioned in 1962, in the same year that the Emmerson Report was published (Survey of Problems Before the Construction Industries), the Banwell Report ‘The Placing and Management of Contracts for Building and Civil Engineering Work’ was published in 1964. It was prepared by a committee headed by Sir Harold Banwell and including leading industry figures from Taylor Woodrow Construction, Trollope & Colls, Sir Alexander Gibb & Partners and others.
The report focussed on team relationships, construction contracts and other construction documentation (notably bills of quantities). It looked in detail at the traditional separation between design and construction and criticised the industry for having entrenched positions and operating with a lack of speed and purpose.
The report questioned why there was one form of contract for building, a different form for civil engineering and still another for government work. It recommended instead the eventual creation of a common form of contract for building and civil engineering.
Significantly the report recommended the sharing of feedback by anonymously listing prices submitted as a record to be shared with all firms that have tendered. This does not presume appointment based on the lowest bid, nor does it disclose identities but it does help bid managers to keep their pricing more competitive.
The recommendations of the report were adopted by many Local Authorities although not taken up by the Ministry of Works, and action on contracts was not supported by industry bodies such as the Joint Contracts Tribunal and the Civil Engineering Conditions of Contract Standing Joint Committee.
In 1967, the Potts Report was launched, apparently to try to implement some of the findings of the Banwell Report (Potts Report, Action on the Banwell Report: A Survey of the Implementation of the Recommendations of the Committee under the Chairmanship of Sir Harold Banwell on the Placing and Management of Contracts. Economic Development Committee for Building of the National Economic Development Office).
Meanwhile, on the ground, practice continues to be driven by market forces rather than government reports because the industry's culture is so set in the habit of lowest price appointments. Having said that, Banwell's suggestion of publishing all prices submitted by participating firms is an excellent way to encourage fairer competition and was successfully adopted by many local authorities. Future improvements can only occur if the findings of research are better promoted by leading bodies such as ICE, RIBA, RICS and CIOB...
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Exchange for Change for UK deposit return scheme
The UK Deposit Management Organisation established to deliver Deposit Return Scheme unveils trading name.
A guide to integrating heat pumps
As the Future Homes Standard approaches Future Homes Hub publishes hints and tips for Architects and Architectural Technologists.
BSR as a standalone body; statements, key roles, context
Statements from key figures in key and changing roles.
ECA launches Welsh Election Manifesto
ECA calls on political parties 100 day milestone to the Senedd elections.
Resident engagement as the key to successful retrofits
Retrofit is about people, not just buildings, from early starts to beyond handover.
Plastic, recycling and its symbol
Student competition winning, M.C.Esher inspired Möbius strip design symbolising continuity within a finite entity.
Do you take the lead in a circular construction economy?
Help us develop and expand this wiki as a resource for academia and industry alike.
Warm Homes Plan Workforce Taskforce
Risks of undermining UK’s energy transition due to lack of electrotechnical industry representation, says ECA.
Cost Optimal Domestic Electrification CODE
Modelling retrofits only on costs that directly impact the consumer: upfront cost of equipment, energy costs and maintenance costs.
The Warm Homes Plan details released
What's new and what is not, with industry reactions.
Could AI and VR cause an increase the value of heritage?
The Orange book: 2026 Amendment 4 to BS 7671:2018
ECA welcomes IET and BSI content sign off.
How neural technologies could transform the design future
Enhancing legacy parametric engines, offering novel ways to explore solutions and generate geometry.
Key AI related terms to be aware of
With explanations from the UK government and other bodies.
From QS to further education teacher
Applying real world skills with the next generation.
Comments
To start a discussion about this article, click 'Add a comment' above and add your thoughts to this discussion page.
It is a bit of a shame the last sentence is slightly ambiguous. Readers not having been immersed in the subject for years might read it as being a good thing!
KS
I edited the last sentence that KS refers to so that it is no longer ambiguous and added remarks that the reports findings were successfully adopted by many Local Authorities. Particularly useful was Banwell's recommendation to anonymously share all prices received with the participating bidders so that they could improve competitiveness and market share.
TC