Levelling the playing field
![]() |
The Electrical Contractors' Association (ECA) has long maintained a view on what constitutes standard industry practice in contracting.
Its perspective is informed by enquiries from nearly 3,000 specialist contractors. ECA is therefore able to highlight ostensibly onerous practices within an industry where contracts can be unforgiving.
In the construction and facilities management sectors, clients attempt to dictate the terms and conditions upon which ECA Members are engaged to carry out their work.
There are two ways in which ECA Members are commonly asked to enter into contracts with their clients, namely:
- Modified standard form of contracts i.e. JCT or NEC.
- In-house bespoke terms and conditions which are procured as an investment in commercial risk protection by the client in question.
There are two reasons why modified standard forms or bespoke forms of contract come about:
- To recognise specific project risks, e.g. if the project is on a high security risk site, there may be additional contractual requirements surrounding security;
- Commercial risk transfer: in order to de-risk the commercial model of their own business, clients will often seek – either through standard form modifications or bespoke terms – to push as much commercial risk downwards within the contractual chain as possible.
The latter approach is intended to safeguard the profitability of their businesses, but it will often pass on unmanageable and overly onerous risk to the party carrying out the works.
ECA has published a guidance document that identifies common areas of standard form contracts (which broadly represent the industry norm for what is acceptable risk allocation) and/or bespoke terms and identifies where those issues are modified to an ECA Member’s detriment.
The document also outlines the risk of those types of clauses; it suggests a risk-proportionate approach and rationale for finding and negotiating a compromise which aligns the risks involved with the parties who are realistically and proportionately in a position to manage those risks.
ECA wishes to identify and inform the engineering services sector and ECA Members’ decisions on what ‘fair, reasonable and good contractual practice’ looks like. ECA remains committed to fair and open competition and this document is not designed in any way to dictate what may be an appropriate risk allocation for a specific project, or act as a substitute for ECA Members obtaining project and context-specific legal advice.
ECA Members can click here to view ECA guidance on what are considered onerous contractual practices and how to handle them.
[edit] About this article
This article was written by Rob Driscoll, ECA Director of Legal and Business. It was previously published on the ECA website in August 2019 and can be accessed here.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Bespoke construction contract
- Complex project.
- Concession Contracts Regulations.
- Constructing Excellence contract
- Contract documents for construction
- Core clause.
- Intermediate building contract
- JCT
- JCT Construction management contract
- Modifying clauses in standard forms of construction contract
- NEC Option A: Priced contract with activity schedule
- NEC3
- Non-performance.
- PPC 2000
- Procurement plan.
- Procurement route
- Procurement team
- Risk allocation.
- Standard form of contract
- Traditional contract for construction
- Traditional contract: tender
- Typical tender process for construction projects
--ECA
Featured articles and news
Boiler Upgrade Scheme and certifications consultation
Summary of government consultation which closes 11 June 2025.
Deputy editor of AT, Tim Fraser, discusses the newly formed society with its current chair, Chris Halligan MCIAT.
Barratt Lo-E passivhaus standard homes planned enmasse
With an initial 728 Lo-E homes across two sites and many more planned for the future.
Government urged to uphold Warm Homes commitment
ECA and industry bodies write to Government concerning its 13.2 billion Warm Homes manifesto commitment.
Places of Worship in Britain and Ireland, 1929-1990. Book review.
The emancipation of women in art.
CIOB Construction Manager of the Year 2025
Just one of the winners at the CIOB Awards 2025.
Call for independent National Grenfell oversight mechanism
MHCLG share findings of Building Safety Inquiry in letter to Secretary of State and Minister for Building Safety.
The Architectural Technology Awards
AT Awards now open for this the sixth decade of CIAT.
50th Golden anniversary ECA Edmundson awards
Deadline for submissions Friday 30 May 2025.
The benefits of precast, off-site foundation systems
Top ten benefits of this notable innovation.
Encouraging individuals to take action saving water at home, work, and in their communities.
Takes a community to support mental health and wellbeing
The why of becoming a Mental Health Instructor explained.
Mental health awareness week 13-18 May
The theme is communities, they can provide a sense of belonging, safety, support in hard times, and a sense purpose.
Mental health support on the rise but workers still struggling
CIOB Understanding Mental Health in the Built Environment 2025 shows.
Design and construction material libraries
Material, sample, product or detail libraries a key component of any architectural design practice.
Construction Products Reform Green Paper and Consultation
Still time to respond as consultation closes on 21 May 2025.
Resilient façade systems for smog reduction in Shanghai
A technical approach using computer simulation and analysis of solar radiation, wind patterns, and ventilation.