- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 29 Oct 2020
How to write an inspection and test plan
An Inspection & Test Plan (ITP) is document which describes the plan for managing the quality control and assurance of a particular element of the construction works providing information on the requirements, overview of the method(s) to be used, responsibilities of relevant parties, and documentary evidence to be provided to verify compliance.
Based on the generic template provided (File:18 04 13 CONSIG ITP Template Rev 3.0.pdf), the following guidance takes you through the process for establishing an ITP. This article should be read in conjunction with the article "Inspection & Test Plans (ITPs)".
The Inspection and Test Plan Template (17 07 28 CONSIG ITP Template Rev 2.0) is also available in Excel format for information purposes and may be downloaded and utilised as appropriate. Please click here to access the file.
[Figure 1: ITP Scope Summary]
Most people associate the criteria for the works with the drawings and specifications. Although, these are likely to be the most significant sources of information, there are others and it is important to consider them. Drawings and specification often refer to and require compliance with other documentation (e.g. a specification for concrete may refer to the National Structural Concrete Specification). Therefore, the following may be a list of relevant items to consider although this is not exhaustive:
- Drawings (including notes on the drawings)
- Design specifications
- British / European / International Standards
- Other standards (e.g. National Structural Steelwork Specification, National Structural Concrete Specification)
- Manufacturers’ requirements
- Contract requirements
- Planning conditions
- Building Control requirements
- National House Building Council requirements
- Legislative requirements
- Lessons learnt workshops
- Business Management System of the organisation
- Sample and Benchmarks
When producing an ITP is it often useful to think about the stages of delivery in chronological order and assign the assurance activity items (produced in Steps 4 and 5) to a relevant stage as shown in Figure 2. Further information about each stage is provided below.
[Figure 2: Delivery stages]
Pre-Construction: There may be items which need to be inspected & witnessed before the works start. For example, it would be prudent to undertake a check to make sure that the design is suitably developed. There may be a requirement for design prior to any manufacture or site works, e.g. structural steel fabrication drawings. This may require drawing approvals, checking of calculations etc. There may also be a requirement for the submission and approval of samples or mock-ups to verify design requirements. These should be referenced where appropriate. Additionally, the Risk Assessment / Method Statements may require approval and a check might need to be completed to ensure persons undertaking the works are suitably competent.
Off Site Manufacture: In cases where a product is manufactured away from site, appropriate consideration is often not given to how the principal contractor or contractor will ensure and demonstrate the product is compliant. However, it is extremely important. Once the product arrives on site, if incorrect, it will be too late and may have significant implications for the programme. Therefore, it is important to consider how compliance of these work will be assured. For example, it may be necessary to visit the factory, undertake Factory Acceptance Tests (FATs), or request specific assurance documentation. In some situations, a completely separate ITP may be produced by the principal contractor for an element of the works which is manufactured off site.
Site Works: In most cases, the site works section of the ITP will constitute the most significant proportion by volume of the ITP. This section will specify how the physical construction works on site will be inspected and tested.
Testing & Commissioning: Although, as described earlier, the ITP document collectively describes testing / inspection activities, this section usually specifies the testing of the completed works and is often most significant for Mechanical, Electrical and Public Health packages. However, testing is still required for many other civil and building elements of the works such as cube and slump tests for concrete, mortar cube tests, hammer drop tests for screed, noise attenuation testing for internal partitions and air leakage testing for building control acceptance to name a few.
Post Construction Activities: Although the physical works element may be completed, there are other activities which may still need to be undertaken post completion. For example, ‘snagging’ of the works may be required and the Operating & Maintenance Manual information provided. Works may also have an inspection and handover process to the client. One of the most important elements of this stage may be how the works are to be protected in readiness for works by follow on trades.
Steps 4 & 5 will most likely take the most time and effort to complete. The outcome from these steps will be to have all quality assurance activities relevant to the specified scope of the works (stage 1) listed on the ITP.
To determine the items which need to be listed on the ITP, the most straightforward way is probably to go through each of criteria documents in turn in a systematic manner and pick out the items which need to be listed on the ITP.
It is then necessary to consider each item in turn and provide details of how the criteria will be met, the evidence which will be produced, who should be involved in the assurance activity and finally the type of inspection or test involved.
There is no standard which states which columns should be included and generally each organisation develops their own preferred template. On occasion, clients may also specify the use of a particular template. The attached template provides an example but may be adapted as required.
Using the attached template:
[Figure 4: Assurance Activity]
Step 4b: Next, details of the criteria should be provided. It is useful (for future reference) to include full details of the exact source document which should also include the revision number (as revisions of the same document could differ) and location within the document (e.g. specification clause number):
[Figure 5: Requirement]
[Figure 6: Compliance]
Step 5b: A corresponding description of how compliance will be demonstrated should then be specified:
[Figure 7: Demonstration]
[Figure 8: Evidence]
Step 5e: Finally, the parties or persons involved in the inspection activity should be specified. Very often this information is presented with one column dedicated to each party / person. Codes are usually developed which summarise the type of test and level of involvement:
[Figure 10: Parties / individual involved; type of test]
As with the ITP template, there are no standard ‘codes’ and organisations usually develop their own preferred method. However, there are some standard accepted types of inspection and test. The following are the most common categories of inspection / test activity. Suggested abbreviations are included in brackets:
- Witness (W): The activity will be verified by the party / individual acting as a witness to the satisfactory completion of the item.
- Inspection (I): The activity will involve a party or person undertaking an inspection of the item.
- Hold Point (HP): The next stage must not commence until the item is completed satisfactorily.
- Surveillance (S): A ‘surveillance’ is essentially a mini audit which reviews an aspect of the works in more detail to verify compliance.
- Audit (AU): An audit would require that a competent auditor undertakes an audit to verify the item is satisfactorily completed (e.g. for off site manufacture).
Often, it is not necessary or practicable for every party to fully witness or inspect all works activities but, dependent on contractual relationships, a representative sample may be used to gain confidence of compliance. For example, the ‘owner’ of the ITP (often the trade contractor) will likely need to verify compliance of all aspects. However, the principal contract may witness only a representative percentage and the project client select a small sample still. Therefore, it is often useful to indicate the level to which the party / individual will be involved (e.g. 10%, 50%, 100% etc.). In the above example (Figure 10), the ITP column for Principal Contractor specifies ‘W(100)’ indicating 100% witnessing of the activity although the principal contractor’s client inspects 10% ‘I (10)’.
Hold points are a critical part of the quality assurance process. In the above example (Figure 10), the subcontractor may not proceed to order concrete until the UKAS accreditation is completed. Therefore, the subcontractor inspects the document but this is also a hold point (H / I).
Rev 3.0: Original article written by Mike Buss (14/7/17) & reviewed by Jon Adshead (20 / 07 / 2017) and Simon Ellis (8/8/17) on behalf of the Construction Special Interest Construction Working Group (ConSIG CWG). Article peer reviewed and accepted for publication by ConSIG 09 / 08 / 2017.
Disclaimer: The use of the ITP template must be tailored to contract conditions and the authors and the CQI Construction Special Interest Group bear no responsibility for any unintended consequences resulting from an inappropriate application of the principles described. The ITP template provided should be treated as indicative only.
--ConSIG CWG 13:17, 05 Jan 2019 (BST)
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Assurance and self-certification.
- Construction quality.
- Design freeze: a quality perspective.
- How to write a method statement.
- Inspection and test plan.
- Method statement.
- Operating and maintenance manual
- Principal contractor.
- Quality assurance.
- Quality culture and behaviours.
- Risk assessment.
Featured articles and news
LETI publishes guidance for energy efficient home retrofits.
Predictions about adequate post-pandemic IAQ in non-domestic buildings.
Government publishes plans to 'build back greener'.
The contentious nature of claims associated with cladding, fire safety and EWS1 forms.
ECA comments on low-carbon heating systems initiative and Heat and Buildings Strategy.
Cinders and other forms of domestic rubbish created filth but also generated great wealth.
CIC 2050 Group requests input to find out priorities for future industry leaders.
IHBC publishes response to consultation.
Institute applauds funding initiatives but presses for additional retrofit and tax measures.