- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 14 Sep 2020
How to design a pad foundation
For a general introduction, see Pad foundation.
For different types, see Types of pad foundation.
Pad foundations are a form of spread foundation formed by rectangular, square, or sometimes circular concrete ‘pads’ that support localised single-point loads such as structural columns, groups of columns or framed structures. This load is then spread by the pad to the bearing layer of soil or rock below. Pad foundations can also be used to support ground beams.
A pad foundation should be designed to effectively spread a concentrated force into a bearing stratum. They are a popular design solution as they are generally cost-effective and are relatively easy to design and construct, and are suitable for most subsoils except loose sands, loose gravels and filled areas.
In order for pad foundations to spread the load into the soil, the pad must be either sufficiently deep (allowing the force of the load to spread out at a pre-defined angle), or be constructed with adequate reinforcement. The soil’s bearing capacity, as well as the concrete’s strength, are the factors that define the angle of the load’s spread.
The type of skeletal frame will determine the pad foundation design. For example, a cast insitu concrete column will require a kicker and continuity bars to be cast into the pad. Steel frame, timber frame or precast concrete framed structures will require holding-down bolts to be cast into the top of the pad or sockets to be formed.
Unfactored ground pressure (kN/m²)
hf = the depth of the footing
For low-rise buildings, it is generally recommended to limit the overall depth of a pad foundation to 1 m from ground level. When designing the pad, care should be taken to ensure that it is large enough to prevent tension within the concrete, which could result in cracking and failure.
Reinforced concrete pads should be designed so that the depth is sufficient to resist a shear force known as ‘punching shear’. This can develop around the perimeter of the column, wall or other vertical component that the pad is supporting. Bending can also occur as the pad footing spreads the load onto the stratum.
To resist bending moments, the pad footing should be designed so that the force is applied within the middle third of the base. This is known as the ‘middle third rule’ – a design practice that means the size of the foundation is defined according to the resultant force’s centralisation. There is an equation that defines the distribution of compression stress across the pad foundation:
- p = compressive stress in the soil under the pad foundation.
- P = applied axial load, including the self-weight of the footing.
- B = width of the pad foundation.
- L = length of the pad foundation.
- e = eccentricity of the applied axial load taken at the centre of the bearing.
Uplift can occur if the applied force lies outside the middle third of the base. What this means is that where the applied forces are greater than, and acting in the opposite direction to, the self-weight of the pad, it can cause the pad to lift. The equation for calculating the value of the applied bearing stress on the soil is as follows:
- y = distance from the line of action.
- P = nearest edge of the pad footing. This is defined as L/2 - e.
- Mx = applied bending moment in the major axis.
- Zx = elastic modulus of the pad foundation in its major axis in plan.
- My = applied bending moment in the minor axis.
- Zy = elastic modulus of the pad foundation in its minor axis in plan.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Building foundations.
- Driven piles.
- How deep should foundations be?
- Pad foundation.
- Pile foundations.
- Raft foundation.
- Screw pile foundations.
- Strip foundation.
- Trench fill foundation.
- Types of pad foundation.
Featured articles and news
Retirement community harmonises old buildings with new structures.
Defended Scapa Flow from WWII attacks, but now battered by rising sea levels.
The real economic impact of historic preservation.
None have anything to do with maths, physics or science!
Report includes sales vs production of compressors by type.
Government announces latest plans for growth.
Will the new requirements - once passed - go far enough?
These post-WWII modular buildings were unpopular, yet ubiquitous.
What's the verdict from the court of public opinion?
Shift to home-based work influences closed plan preferences.
An overview of the current state of the market.
Organisation offers best practices for construction and modification.
Heritage on the edge?
Prioritising tax considerations.