Last edited 31 Aug 2026

Employer's requirements for building design and construction

Construction-safety-consulting.jpg

[edit] Introduction

Employer's requirements are typically used on design and build projects (such as Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) DB16) or on a traditional contract where the contractor is to design discrete parts of the works.

They provide a description of the client's requirements, including the specification for the building, the scope of services required from the contractor and an allocation of risk for unknown items. Contractor's proposals are then prepared in response to the employer's requirements. These present the contractor's suggested approach for designing and constructing the building, along with their price.

The level of detail in the employer's requirements and the extent of design required from the contractor is very variable. Employer's requirements can range from a very simple specification to a fully developed performance specification and concept design.

The employer's requirements is a very important document as it defines the success of the outcome. The better prepared they are, the keener the price from the contractor and the less likely there will be disputes. If the employer's requirements are not properly developed, the client can incur significant additional costs, as any requirements which are not properly specified, or are changed, will require the issue of instructions for which the client will be charged by the contractor.

Contracts may be awarded on either a single-stage or two-stage tender process. A single-stage process is suitable where the information presented in the employer's requirements is sufficiently well developed for the contractor to be able to calculate a realistic price.

This can be the case either if a concept design has already been prepared by consultants working for the client, or if the building is very straightforward, in which case much of the design work might be carried out by the contractor during the tender process.

A two-stage tender is suitable where the employer's requirements are not sufficiently well developed for the contractor to be able to calculate a realistic price. In this case, the contractor may tender a fee for designing the building along with a schedule of rates that can be used to establish the construction price for the second stage tender.

Employer's requirements might include:

Once the client has received the contractor's proposals, there is likely to be a period of negotiation during which any inconsistencies between the contractor's proposals and the employer's requirements are discussed, and either the contractor's proposals or the employer's requirements are amended to ensure agreement between them. This is an important part of the tender process, as it is not always entirely clear which document prevails after the contract has been entered into.

[edit] Dealing with a complaint

If a client alleges that a defect is due to negligent design, the architect's first action would typically be to notify their professional indemnity insurer of a possible claim for negligence.

Professional indemnity insurance is required of architects under the ARB and RIBA codes of conduct. Standard appointment documents - such as the RIBA Standard Professional Services Contract 2020 (2024 amendment), which replaced the earlier RIBA Standard Conditions of Appointment for an Architect 2010 (2012 revision), now withdrawn - typically require the architect to maintain professional indemnity insurance and to disclose relevant exclusions, such as those relating to cladding and fire safety. Such contracts commonly also include a Net Contribution clause, an express term that limits a claim for damages against the architect to their fair share of the losses incurred, rather than the full loss.

For example, a judge may find that 70% of the damage is down to poor workmanship from the contractor, with 30% resulting from negligent design. Under a Net Contribution clause, the architect would only be liable for the 30% attributable to their own negligence. Without such a clause, the architect could be exposed to a much larger claim from the client for the full amount, since a claimant is generally entitled to recover the whole of its loss from any one of several concurrently liable parties, leaving that party to seek a contribution from the others.

[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings

Designing Buildings Anywhere

Get the Firefox add-on to access 20,000 definitions direct from any website

Find out more Accept cookies and
don't show me this again