- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 20 May 2020
Construction work packaging
Packaging is normally associated with general contractors who split a large project into a series of work packages suitable for obtaining tenders and placing orders with the subcontracting and goods supply chain, thereby transferring risk for delivering some elements of the works to others.
However, the design team, generally advised by the cost consultant, may elect to preempt a general contractor by selecting specialist systems required for early inclusion into the evolving design. This creates a built in package requirement.
A package can include any or all of the following activities:
- Manufacture and/or supply.
- Pre-fabrication and delivery.
- Site installation.
- Operation and maintenance.
Under a traditional contract the main contractor will split tender documents into subcontractor packages that are geared to the most competitive returns, which are then included in the main contractor’s tender offer to the client.
Under a management contract the client’s cost consultant and the management contractor, in co-operation with designers, decide how to package the works and direct the team as a whole to produce package designs suitable for obtaining subcontracts under the terms of the management contract. This method of procurement allows parallel working on design and construction. For example, work on the foundations and superstructure can commence before the design for the whole building is complete.
A construction management contract follows the procedure of a management contract except the package contractor enters into a direct contract with the client, administered by the construction manager.
The adoption of Building Information Modelling (BIM) is likely to lead to an increase in the early appointment of specialist package contractors by design teams to avoid having their model unravelled by appointments that might otherwise have been made at a later stage. This suggests that in traditional tendering, main contractors will be forced to adopt the specialist without any freedom of choice. This may lead to some interesting legal wrangles in respect of non-performance or delays caused by the imposed specialist subcontractor.
- The interface between packages must be carefully considered, defined and constantly monitored.
- Elements can fall between packages (for example the flashing to a roof rainwater outlet).
- Responsibility and consequent liability must be clearly defined.
- The way each package is to be monitored should be agreed when placing orders to save package management resources and avoid man-for-man marking which is duplicative and costly.
- The risks transferred to the package contractor need to be proportionate to the size of organisation executing the package. For instance four weeks of full liquidated and ascertained damages might be of greater value than the subcontractor’s annual turnover and so would be unsustainable.
- On large building projects divide the project cost by £2m to establish the number of differently priced packages. For example; £200m = 100 packages, £50m = 25 packages, and so on.
- On medium size building projects divide the project cost by £1m to establish the number of differently priced packages.
- On fit out projects, which have a high monthly turnover and a fast programme, stick to say five packages; mechanical, electrical, information technology, building work and furniture and equipment.
 Typical breakdown of packages (excluding preliminaries) on an office development
- Demolition and site clearance.
- Substructure and underground drainage.
- Cladding system.
- Roof and balcony finishes.
- Floor and staircase screeds.
- Mechanical installations and plumbing.
- Electrical installation.
- Raised access floors.
- Suspended ceilings.
- Metalwork and balustrades.
- Brick and blockwork.
- Prefabricated toilets.
- Internal partitions.
- Joinery and ironmongery.
- External works.
- Testing and commissioning.
- General building work including plastering.
 Association for Project Management definition
Earned Value Management Handbook, Published by the Association for Project Management in March 2013 suggests work packages are: ‘…the lowest level at which performance data is normally analysed. It is therefore important to balance the length and scope of the work package against reporting cycle lengths, and to consider when and how to earn ‘value’. Each work package must have a clearly defined start condition and finish point, with all deliverables defined. The scope of each work package must be unambiguously defined with the procedures to be followed identified. Each work package comprises a number of activities to be performed.’
See also: Planning package.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Bills of quantities.
- Common arrangement of work sections.
- Comparison of SMM7 with NRM2.
- Construction management.
- Liquidated and ascertained damages.
- Management contract.
- New Rules of Measurement.
- Planning package.
- Production information.
- Standard Method of Measurement (SMM7).
- Traditional contract.
- Trade contractor.
- Work breakdown structure.
- Works contractor.
Featured articles and news
Connecting building design from inception to completion to operations.
Gregor Harvie predicts interoperability will be construction’s Uber moment.
Expert commentary and insight.
Guidance offered for stained glass window maintenance.
Define need before determining viability.
Framework examines social value of projects.
RfX or Request for [fill in the blank].
Organisation establishes Equality, Diversity, Inclusion taskforce.
Government announces plans for new building projects.
Outsourcing method to procure and manage supplies.
Joint support of Local Authority Historic Environment and Conservation Services.
The Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel is an outstanding achievement.
Buildings of the interwar years. Book review.
Ireland’s climate change sectoral adaptation plan.
Rethinking the acoustics of the office.