Last edited 09 Jun 2021

Embodied energy in construction



[edit] Introduction

It is thought that in the UK, buildings account for around 50% of the total energy consumed (ref. CIBSE). The UK construction industry is the largest consumer of resources, consuming more than 400 million tonnes of material a year (ref. Davis Langdon), and this consumption of materials in itself accounts for around 10% of UK carbon emissions (ref. ENVEST from ICE).

The energy consumed by a building throughout its life comprises:

The full, life-cycle ‘cradle-to-graveembodied energy a building therefore is the initial embodied energy plus the recurring embodied energy plus the demolition energy.

For more information, see Cradle-to-grave.

Embodied energy in buildings was first considered when the industry began to undertake detailed life cycle assessments, evaluating the whole-life environmental load of buildings. It had been assumed that service and maintenance operations during a buildings life consumed considerably more energy than the processes used to construct it (ref. The Living Rainforest, 2013), however, assessment revealed that this was not always true, with some building's embodied energy equating to several years of maintenance.

As regulation and improvements in efficiency reduce the amount of energy buildings use in operation, so embodied energy becomes relatively more significant. If zero carbon buildings become a reality, all attention will be focussed on embodied energy.

A study of Swedish low-energy buildings found that in one case the initial embodied energy was as much as 40% of the energy consumed by the building through its 50-year life (ref. Thormark 2002).

In the UK, a study found that the embodied energy in some commercial buildings was much as 30 times the annual operational energy use (ref. Rawlinson 2007).

[edit] Measurement

The process of assessing embodied energy involves measuring or estimating the total energy consumed in the life-cycle of a product. This may include gas, electricity, oil, and so on, but can also include features that may not be as easy to quantify, such as water use and ecological impact.

The measurement process involves assessing the relevant production means, which may include but is not limited to:

Some assessment methods exclude maintenance and disposal, but this is not ideal.

The full measure of the energy processes involved in the various stages of a product's life is often referred to as 'cradle-to-grave'. However, the embodied energy of products is often specified in terms of 'cradle-to-gate’, that is, the energy consumed until the product leaves the factory gate. An alternative measure is ‘cradle-to-site’, which is the energy consumed until the product reaches the construction site.

NB: Life cycle assessments, evaluate all impacts over the whole life of a product or element. In a full life cycle assessment, the energy and materials used, along with waste and pollutants produced as a consequence of a product or activity are quantified over the whole life cycle (see Life cycle assessment for more information).

A further complication is the concept of ‘embodied carbon’. This refers to the carbon dioxide emitted as a consequence of sourcing and processing materials or products, concerned with mechanical and chemical operations and the by-products these create.

The terms embodied energy and embodied carbon produce very different figures. For example, cement has an embodied energy of 4.5 MJ/kg but has an embodied carbon value of 0.73 kg CO2/kg (ref. The University of Bath ICE, 2013). Correctly measuring embodied carbon includes consideration of the sequestration of carbon within materials such as timber as well as chemical reactions such as the carbonation of concrete.

The units of measurement for embodied energy are represented as megajoule per kilogram (MJ/kg). This is the energy density of a material. Embodied energy can also be expressed in terms of MJ/m2.

There are number of tools that have been developed to help assess embodied energy:

[edit] Design considerations

Calculation of embodied energy is very complex, and is just one of the environmental indicators that designers must consider when specifying materials and components for a building.

Other considerations might include the deleterious nature of some materials, difficulty of disposal, ecological impact, waste generation, recycled component and recyclability, renewable resources, locally sourced materials, ease of deconstruction and separation, durability, efficiency in use, standardisation, and so on (see Sustainable materials for more information).

A higher embodied energy material or component may sometimes be justified, for example if it reduces operational energy requirements (such as higher efficiency building services, high performance glazing, or high durability aluminium). Whilst lightweight building materials may tend to have a lower embodied energy, they might result in higher heating or cooling requirements, whilst heavyweight construction can even out diurnal temperature swings and so reduce overall energy consumption.

NBClimate Emergency Design Guide: How new buildings can meet UK climate change’, published by The London Energy Transformation Initiative (LETI) in January 2020 defines ‘upfront embodied carbon’ as: ‘The carbon emissions associated with the extraction and processing of materials, the energy and water consumption used by the factory in producing products, transporting materials to site, and constructing the building.’

[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki

[edit] External references


To start a discussion about this article, click 'Add a comment' above and add your thoughts to this discussion page.

Designing Buildings Anywhere

Get the Firefox add-on to access 20,000 definitions direct from any website

Find out more Accept cookies and
don't show me this again