Embodied energy in construction
It is thought that in the UK, buildings account for around 50% of the total energy consumed (ref CIBSE). The UK construction industry is the largest consumer of resources, consuming more than 400 million tonnes of material a year (ref Davis Langdon) and this consumption of materials in itself accounts for around 10% of UK carbon emissions (ref. ENVEST from ICE).
The energy consumed by a building throughout its life comprises:
- Initial embodied energy. The energy consumed to create the building, including; extraction, processing and manufacture, transportation and assembly.
- Recurring embodied energy. That is the energy consumed in refurbishing and maintaining the building during its life.
- Operational energy. The energy consumed in heating, cooling, lighting and powering appliances in the building.
- Demolition energy: The energy consumed in the disposal of the building.
Embodied energy in buildings was first considered when the industry began to undertake detailed life cycle assessments, evaluating the whole-life environmental load of buildings. It had been assumed that service and maintenance operations during a buildings life consumed considerably more energy than the processes used to construct it (ref The Living Rainforest, 2013), however, assessment revealed that this was not always true, with some building's embodied energy equating to several years of maintenance.
As regulation and improvements in efficiency reduce the amount of energy buildings use in operation, so embodied energy becomes relatively more significant. If zero carbon buildings become a reality, all attention will be focussed on embodied energy.
A study of Swedish low-energy buildings found that in one case the initial embodied energy was as much as 40% of the energy consumed by the building through its 50 year life (ref. Thormark 2002). In the UK, a study found that the embodied energy in some commercial buildings was much as 30 times the annual operational energy use (ref. Rawlinson 2007).
The process of assessing embodied energy involves measuring or estimating the total energy consumed in the life-cycle of a product. This may include; gas, electricity, oil, and so on, but can also include features that are not be easy to quantify such as water use and ecological impact.
The measurement process involves assessing the relevant production means, which may include but is not limited to:
- Manufacturing (including the energy to manufacture capital equipment, heating and lighting of factories and so on)
The full measure of the energy processes involved in the various stages of a products life is often referred to as 'cradle to grave'. However, the embodied energy of products is often specified in terms of 'Cradle-to-Gate’, that is, the energy consumed until the product leaves the factory gate. An alternative measure is ‘Cradle-to-Site’, which is the energy consumed until the product reaches the construction site.
NB: Life cycle assessments, evaluate all impacts over the whole life of a product or element. In a full life cycle assessment, the energy and materials used, along with waste and pollutants produced as a consequence of a product or activity are quantified over the whole life cycle (see life cycle assessment for more information).
A further complication is the concept of ‘embodied carbon’. This refers to the carbon dioxide emitted as a consequence of sourcing and processing materials or products, concerned with mechanical and chemical operations and the by-products these create.
The terms embodied energy and embodied carbon produce very different figures. For example, cement has an embodied energy of 4.5 MJ/kg but has an embodied carbon value of 0.73 kg CO2/kg (ref. The University of Bath ICE, 2013). Correctly measuring embodied carbon includes consideration of the sequestration of carbon within materials such as timber as well as chemical reactions such as the carbonation of concrete.
- The Building Research Establishment software Envest II.
- The University of Bath has produced an Inventory of Carbon & Energy (ICE) which uses a cradle-to-site approach.
 Design considerations.
Other considerations might include the deleterious nature of some materials, difficulty of disposal, ecological impact, waste generation, recycled component and recyclability, renewable resources, locally sourced materials, ease of deconstruction and separation, durability, efficiency in use, standardisation and so on (see sustainable materials for more information).
A higher embodied energy material or component may sometimes be justified, for example if it reduces operational energy requirements (such as higher efficiency building services, high performance glazing, or high durability aluminium). Whilst lightweight building materials may tend to have a lower embodied energy, they might result in higher heating or cooling requirements, whilst heavyweight construction can even out diurnal temperature swings and so reduce overall energy consumption.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Building information modelling life cycle assessment IP 5 15.
- Chain of custody.
- Emission rates.
- Energy certificates.
- Energy related products regulations.
- Energy targets.
- Life cycle assessment.
- Life Cycle Costing BG67 2016.
- Performance gap.
- Sustainable materials.
- Utilising life cycle costing and life cycle assessment.
- Where does embodied carbon analysis stop?
- Whole life costs.
- Whole-life value.
 External references
- Designing out waste: a design team guide for buildings. Davis Langdon LLP, 2009.
- A low energy building in a life cycle—its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential. Building and environment. Thormark, C., 2002.
- ENVEST, Environmental impact and Whole Life Costs analysis for buildings.
- Sustainability: Embodied carbon, Building, 12 October 2007, Rawlinson, S., Weight, D. (2007).
- University of Bath, Inventory of Carbon & Energy (ICE) now available from Circular Ecology.
- Mael Spencer 2017
‘Money is not the barrier’ - bursary places (mainly for the Day School) are still available for the IHBC’s 2018 School in Belfast on 21-23 June, themed on ‘Our Shared’.
In response to UNESCO’s concerns, Liverpool City Council and Peel Holdings have taken 3 positive initiatives to minimise the risk of Liverpool losing World Heritage Status.
The Scottish Parliament Information Centre provides short definitions of commonly used planning terms and abbreviations, characterised as jargon.