- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 13 Feb 2020
‘Construction dust’ includes a number of different types of dusts that are commonly generated on construction sites. They can be dirty and cause nuisance, but can also be seriously damaging to health, sometimes with long-term implications.
Construction workers have a particularly high risk of developing health problems as a result of prolonged exposure to high levels of dust. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) estimate that more than 500 construction workers a year are believed to die from exposure to silica dust.
- Cutting paving blocks, kerbs and flags.
- Chasing concrete and raking mortar.
- Dry sweeping site areas.
- Cutting roofing tiles.
- Scabbling or grinding concrete or other construction materials.
- Soft strip demolition.
- Cutting and sanding wood.
- Sanding taped and covered plasterboard joints.
The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH) regulate activities that may expose workers to construction dust. It provides a legal duty for employers to prevent or adequately control worker exposure, and requires that risks are assessed and controlled and that controls are reviewed.
- Silica dust: Created when working on materials that contain silica, such as concrete, mortar and sandstone.
- Wood dust: Created when working on softwood, hardwood, and wood-based products such as MDF and plywood.
- Lower toxicity dusts: Created when working on materials containing little-to-no silica, such as gypsum (in plasterboard), limestone, dolomite and marble.
Dust builds up in the lungs and while the effects may not immediately be obvious, over a prolonged period of time, exposure to high levels of dust can lead to permanent damage to the lungs and airways. Some of the dust-related diseases that most affect construction workers include:
- Lung cancer.
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Reasonable precautions that might be taken to reduce or avoid nuisance in construction might include:
- Keeping neighbours informed.
- Providing a help line so that problems can be reported.
- Storing fine materials under cover.
- Damping fine materials and roadways.
- Minimising demolition or crushing dust.
- Washing down vehicles.
- Taking care when deciding transport routes.
- Providing hard-surfaced roadways.
- Proper waste management.
- Using well-maintained machinery.
- Careful sub-contractor management.
There are a number of factors that will contribute to risks from dust:
- Risk is increased with the more energy that the work involves. High-energy tools like cut-off saws, grinders and grit blasters produce a lot of dust in a very short time.
- Dust will build up depending on how enclosed with working area is.
- The longer the work takes the more dust there will be.
- Risks are increased by regularly doing the same work day after day.
It is important that workers are made aware of the risks from dust and how it can harm their health. They must be fully-trained and informed how to use dust control measures that have been put in place, how to maintain equipment, and how to use and look after respiratory protective equipment (RPE).
- Using building materials that do not require an excessive amount of preparatory cutting to size.
- Silica-free abrasives to reduce risk when blasting.
- Using less-powerful tools, such as a block splitter instead of a higher energy cut-off saw.
- Adopting a different working method, such as direct fastening/screws, or hand-cutting roof tiles.
- Water suppression: Water helps to damp down clouds of dust. Care must be taken to use the right level of water for the whole duration of the work.
- On-tool extraction: Local exhaust ventilation (LEV) systems can be fitted directly onto tools and works to remove dust as it is produced.
 Respiratory protective equipment (RPE)
Preventative and control measures may not always be sufficient, making protective equipment such as powered face masks necessary. Different types of RPE are given an assigned protection factor (APF) which indicates the level of protection it provides. An APF of 20 is the general level for construction dust, which means that the wearer breathes only one-twentieth of the amount of dust in the air.
For more information, see Fit testing.
 Other controls
These prevention and control techniques may need to be used in combination with other controls, such as:
- Keeping the number of workers near the dust-producing work area to a minimum.
- Using sheeting and temporary screens to enclose the work area.
- Using general mechanical ventilation to remove dust-filled air from the work area.
- Rotating workers working on the dust-producing activity.
 Reviewing the controls
It is important that as well as assessing the risks and putting controls in place, regular reviews are held to ensure that they are working correctly. Procedures should be put in place to ensure that dust-producing work is being done correctly and in the safest possible way.
Workers should be involved by consulting them on any problems and solutions that could be introduced. They should also be supervised to ensure they are using the provided controls and the correct work method.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Air quality.
- BREEAM Monitoring of Construction Site Impacts.
- Code of construction practice.
- Construction health risks.
- Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH).
- Deleterious materials.
- Dust control systems.
- Environmental health.
- Filtering facepieces.
- Hazardous substances.
- Nuisance in construction.
- Occupational health.
- Personal protective equipment.
- Reporting accidents and injuries on construction sites.
- Quiet period.
- Site induction.
- The dust control systems market.
- TSI Environmental dust monitoring system.
- What hours are construction sites allowed to operate?
 External resources
Featured articles and news
A quick introduction to a very complicated subject.
CIOB suggests the economic reach of construction is double the official figures.
The first US building to achieve BREEAM Outstanding In-Use.
70 buildings from 70 years of Concrete Quarterly. Book review.
Conserving the iron roof at the Albert Dock.
Delivering an infrastructure revolution.
The admissibility of evidence.
How many can you name? 37 anyone?
CIOB respond to the points-based system.
When is the weather considered 'exceptionally adverse'?
ECA backs call for a rolling programme of rail electrification.