Nuisance in construction
Private nuisance might be caused by:
- Encroachment onto land, for example by trees.
- Damage to land or buildings.
- Interference with a party’s enjoyment of the land, for example by generating excessive noise or smells.
For nuisance to be actionable, there must be actual or prospective damage, although this damage need not be physical, and might be demonstrated by encroachment or unreasonable material interference.
This is a matter of balance and degree, depending on how unreasonable the infringement is, the duration of the nuisance and the timing or repetition of the nuisance. This in turn can depend on circumstance, such as the character of a particular location and the types of activities that are carried out there. Activities that constitute nuisance in one location might be acceptable in another.
In Sturges v Bridgman (1879) Thesiger LJ stated, ‘What would be a nuisance in Belgrave Square would not necessarily be so in Bermondsey’.
The courts will also consider the intention of the defendant and whether there was any malice. Liability for nuisance requires that damage is foreseeable, although this does not necessarily constitute negligence.
Under Part III of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 certain matters may constitute statutory nuisances:
- Artificial light.
- Fumes or gases.
- Accumulation or deposit.
- Animals kept in such a place or manner as to be prejudicial to health or a nuisance.
- Any other matter declared by any enactment to be a statutory nuisance.
Where a local authority establishes any one of these issues constitutes a nuisance (ie is unreasonably interfering with the use or enjoyment of someone’s premises) or is prejudicial to health they must generally serve an abatement notice on the person responsible. Failure to comply with the notice could result prosecution.
Clearly construction works are a potential cause of nuisance. However, construction is a necessary activity and in the case of Andreae v. Selfridge & Co. Limited (1958) Sir Wilfred Green MR suggested that ‘...in respect of operations of this character, such as demolition and building, if they are reasonably carried on and all proper and reasonable steps are taken to ensure that no undue inconvenience is caused to neighbours, whether from noise, dust, or other reasons, the neighbours must put up with it.’
Reasonable precautions that might be taken to reduce or avoid nuisance in construction might include:
- Keep neighbours informed.
- Providing a help line so that problems can be reported.
- Only working at reasonable times and restricting noisy activities to particular periods.
- Storing fine materials under cover.
- Damping fine materials and roadways.
- Minimising demolition or crushing dust.
- Washing down vehicles.
- Taking care when deciding transport routes.
- Providing hard-surfaced roadways.
- Proper waste management and avoiding burning waste materials.
- Limiting vibration.
- Use well-maintained, quiet machinery.
- Careful sub-contractor management.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Air quality.
- Clerk of works.
- Construction dust.
- Contract vs tort.
- Derogation from grant.
- Indoor air quality.
- Light pollution.
- Quiet enjoyment.
- TSI Environmental dust monitoring system.
- Site inspections.
- Right to a view.
- Rights to light.
 External references
Featured articles and news
There were over 1,400 new articles added to Designing Buildings Wiki in 2016. Here are the top 15 most popular.
MVRDV reveal designs for a strange holiday villa in Taiwan.
New milestone achieved with launch of new safety lanyard for working from height.
A quick introductory article about preliminaries in construction.
Brandenburg Gate - an historic structure that went from symbolising German partition to European unity.
A discussion between construction key players and leading insurers on the future outlook for construction insurance.
New guide from BSRIA on building performance evaluation in domestic buildings.
Rogers Stirk Harbour and Partners complete new trio of towers at Sydney Harbour.
With a new government consultation underway, ICE look at creating a smarter, more flexible energy system.
British Antarctic Survey announces research station is to relocate 23km due to growing crack in the ice shelf.
A great example of mimetic architecture with the Fish Building of India.