Last edited 08 Nov 2018

Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission

Inquiry2.jpg

In November 2018, the government announced a new commission to raise the level of debate about the importance of beauty in new housing developments. The ‘Building better, building beautiful’ commission will help ensure new developments meet community needs and expectations, making them more likely to be well-received rather than resisted.

The commission is expected to fill a similar role to that played by the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) which was merged with the Design Council to become Design Council Cabe in 2011.

The creation of the commission follows the government’s rewriting of the planning rules to strengthen design quality expectations and community engagement when planning for development. It will be chaired by the political philosopher and conservative polemicist Sir Roger Scruton, who has been an outspoken critic of modern architects such as Norman Foster and Richard Rogers, with further commissioners to be announced.

The main aims are:

  • To promote improved design and style of homes, villages, towns and high streets, building on the tradition of the relevant area and applying it effectively.
  • To explore how greater community consent can be harnessed to develop new settlements.
  • To make the planning system operate in support of, rather than opposition to, better design and style.

Communities Secretary James Brokenshire MP said:

“Most people agree we need to build more for future generations, but too many still feel that new homes in their local area just aren’t up to scratch. Part of making the housing market work for everyone is helping to ensure that what we build, is built to last. That it respects the integrity of our existing towns, villages and cities.

“This will become increasingly important as we look to create a number of new settlements across the country and invest in the infrastructure and technology they will need to be thriving and successful places.”

However, critics accused the government of reigniting the 1980s argument that pitted modernism against classicism and entirely subjective judgements about what constitutes ‘beautiful’ and ‘successful’ design.

Owen Hatherley commented that, "…for about ten years the dominant stuff in architecture schools, major public commissions, etc, has been a very very classicised modernism - the 1980s Quinlan Terry v Richard Rogers divide just doesn't pertain, and hasn't for ages … the likes of Scruton don't want to talk about that, because they're not interested in architecture, they're interested in re-running the same culture war, over and over again."

Douglas Murphy, author of ‘Last Futures: Nature, Technology and the End of Architecture’ commented that, "...the aesthetics stuff doesn't matter so much, it's low-hanging fruit to say ‘beautiful old things are beautiful’ and it will have next to no effect on a sector that is already completely dysfunctional."

(Ref. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/james-brokenshire-building-better-and-beautiful-will-deliver-more-homes)

Within a week of his appointment, Labour MPs called for the sacking of Roger Scruton for allegedly peddling 'anti-semitic conspiracy theories', a criticism made in relation to comments in a 2014 lecture and in an article in the Daily Telegraph in 2018, as well as controversial statements on homosexuality and Islamophobia.

[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki