'The plan for the future development of the local area, drawn up by the local planning authority in consultation with the community. In law this is described as the development plan documents adopted under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. Current core strategies or other planning policies, which under the regulations would be considered to be development plan documents, form part of the Local Plan. The term includes old policies which have been saved under the 2004 Act.'
Local plans are prepared by one or more district planning authorities (local planning authorities responsible for district matters). They set out a framework for the future development of an area on a 15-year horizon. They define; the priorities for an area, strategic policies, the framework for neighbourhood plans, land allocations, infrastructure requirements, housing needs, requirements for safeguarding the environment, measures for adapting to climate change and so on. These policies should be illustrated geographically on a policies map.
Local plans are also the starting-point for considering whether planning applications should be approved.
The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 set out matters that should be considered when preparing a local plan and prescribe their form and content. The National Planning Policy Framework describes the evidence that should be gathered in the preparation of local plans and the approach that they should adopt (Paras 150 – 185).
Every local plan must be accompanied by a ‘sustainability appraisal’, and if the plan is thought likely to impact on certain habitats or species it may also require a ‘habitats regulation assessment’.
There is a duty to cooperate with neighbouring authorities and certain other public bodies in the preparation of a local plan, and community and statutory consultation is required. In addition, a draft must be submitted to the Planning Inspectorate for examination. See test of soundness for more information.
Local planning authorities are required to have an up to date local plan. They must also prepare a ‘local development scheme’ that (amongst other things) sets out a timetable for reviewing the local plan to ensure it remains up to date. What constitutes ‘up to date’ will depend to some extent on the nature of the local area, but local plans are likely to be updated, at least in part, every five years.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that If a plan is absent, silent or out of date, permission for planning applications should be granted, unless there are significant and demonstrable reasons not to grant permission.
 Stages in a local plan
This image is from ‘Plain English guide to the Planning System’ published by the Department for Communities and Local Government in January 2015. It is made available under the Open Government Licence.
 Progress and reform
- When the transition period came to an end in March 2013, only half of local authorities had adopted local plans in place and the Planning Inspectorate revealed that only 7% of those local plans complied with the requirements of the NPPF (ref Planning: 7% of plans ruled in line with NPPF. 23 March 2013).
- By December 2013, 76% of councils had published a local plan (ref gov.uk Simplified planning to speed up delivery of new homes and support local jobs) but only 55% had an adopted plan in place.
- In December 2014, Planning Minister Brandon Lewis stated; “Now 80 per cent of authorities have published a local plan compared with 32 per cent back in 2010 and 60 per cent of councils now have adopted local plans compared with just 17 per cent when the Government came to power.” Ref Hansard.
- In March 2015, a report by Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners found that local authority progress with local plans over the last three years had been marginal, with only a quarter having a compliant, up-to-date, adopted plan
In January 2014, then planning Minister Nick Boles suggested that new guidance would be issued to the effect that planning applications that might undermine a local plan could be refused if the local plan has been submitted to the Planning Inspectorate but had not yet been approved. (ref planning portal)
In February 2014, The Planning Officers Society suggested that the duty to co-operate between local planning authorities was causing too many local plans to fail and should be restricted to the strategic stage (ref PLANNING FOR A BETTER FUTURE Our planning manifesto for the next government).
In July 2015 a letter from Communities Secretary Greg Clark to the Chief Executive of the Planning Inspectorate Simon Ridley said: “We have recently seen significant positive plan-making progress: 82 per cent of authorities have now published local plans and 64 per cent adopted plans compared with 32 and 17 per cent in May 2010 respectively. However, a written Commons statement made at the same time by Planning Minister Brandon Lewis made clear that where local authorities failed to produce a local plan by early 2017, “We will intervene to arrange for the plan to be written, in consultation with local people.”
In September 2015, Planning Minister Brandon Lewis launched a new panel to look at ways of streamlining the local plan-making process. The panel is due to report in early 2016. For more information see: Expert panel to streamline local plan-making process.
On 15 September 2015, Brandon Lewis MP, Minister for Housing and Planning launched an expert group to consider measures and reforms that could ensure local plans are produced efficiently and effectively. See Local plans expert group for more information.
In March 2016, the Local Plans Expert Group published LOCAL PLANS, Report to the Communities Secretary and to the Minister of Housing and Planning, which set out proposals to speed up and simplify the process of making local plans. A consultation was opened on the proposals, with representations required by 27 April 2016.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Authority monitoring report.
- Community plan.
- Core strategy.
- Development management.
- Development plan.
- Development plan documents.
- Duty to cooperate.
- Expert panel to streamline local plan-making process.
- Fixing the foundations.
- Green belt planning practice guidance.
- Local development framework.
- Local development scheme.
- Local plans expert group.
- Neighbourhood plan.
- New homes bonus.
- Planning authorities.
- Planning permission.
- Safeguarding land.
- Saved policies.
- Skeffington Report.
- Statement of community involvement.
- Supplementary planning documents.
- Sustainable development.
- Test of soundness.
- The London Plan.
 External references
- Planning: 7% of plans ruled in line with NPPF. 23 March 2013.
- gov.uk Simplified planning to speed up delivery of new homes and support local jobs. December 4 2013.
- Planning Officers Society, PLANNING FOR A BETTER FUTURE Our planning manifesto for the next government 19 February 2014.
- Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners, Signal Failure: A Review Of Local Plans And Housing Requirement, March 2015.
Featured articles and news
What will the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) mean for you when they come into force in May?
Business Secretary chairs a new taskforce to monitor and advise on mitigating the impacts of Carillion’s liquidation.
Sir John Armitt is appointed the new chair of the National Infrastructure Commission.
High quality and high density homes - is it what we need or is it storing up trouble?
Government announces its intention to strengthen planning rules to protect music venues and neighbours.
National Audit Office reports that there is little evidence that PFI offers better value than other forms of contracting.
What is liquidation and how does it apply to contractors in the construction industry?
Scrutiny is placed on Carillion's controversial 2013 decision to extend subcontractor payment terms to 120 days.
RSHP unveil their involvement in a boundary crossing which will provide a new entry point into Hong Kong.
With PFI currently under the spotlight due to Carillion, this introductory article explains what they are.
Estimates suggest that up to 30,000 small firms could be at risk of non-payment as a result of Carillion's collapse.