Infrastructure nationalisation
![]() |
In November 2018, the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) published a discussion paper on the potential effects that nationalising parts of Great Britain's economic infrastructure, namely rail, water and energy, would have on investment and service delivery. |
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
In the Labour Party’s 2017 manifesto ahead of that year’s general election, details on the following were outlined:
- Rail networks would be nationalised as each private franchise expires;
- The water ownership system would be replaced with a network of regional publicly-owned companies;
- The ‘Big Six’ private energy firms would have operator license conditions changed, and there would be a gradual transition to a publicly-owned, decentralised energy system.
With this in mind, alongside high public support for nationalisation, it’s important to examine the potential implications that public ownership on this scale may have on Great Britain’s infrastructure. This includes finance and investment, the jobs infrastructure sustains and creates, as well as the long-term viability and need to meet future challenges.
In compiling this discussion paper, ICE has conducted desk research and spoken with key stakeholders in the rail, energy and water sectors, as well as political parties and independent infrastructure experts.
The paper itself doesn’t represent a series of ICE policy positions. Instead, it outlines the potential costs, benefits, practical and technical implications that could result from nationalisation, providing a source of impartial advice for policymakers.
[edit] Strong public support and the realities of nationalisation
One key area of focus for ICE’s paper was to contrast the possible implications of nationalisation within the context of public perception. In opinion poll after opinion poll, the public is often overwhelmingly in favour of public ownership of the utilities and rail.
Questions have been asked around market competition, excessive dividend pay-outs and executive pay, public subsidies, rising consumer costs, corporate governance arrangements and levels of company debt. These are valid concerns, with some recognised by the government and action now underway to address them.
But there’s another side to this coin. As anyone in the media will say, good news doesn’t always sell.
The day-to-day safe and reliable operation of the utilities and railways, something that didn’t always occur under public ownership, and huge increases in investment and productivity are often not recognised.
And while rail prices remain high, UK water and energy bills are actually less expensive than many other developed countries’ state-owned utility networks.
Indeed, when the public were presented with a poll on nationalising the water sector with arguments for and against, support fell significantly.
While backing for nationalisation is a simple binary answer to give to a poll question, it’s unclear what real risks the public are prepared to take in enacting sweeping changes to the country’s infrastructure systems.
[edit] The bigger picture
Climate change, a growing population with more people concentrated in urban areas, and the digital revolution will all change the demands placed on infrastructure and shape how it’s used.
When the ownership of infrastructure assets is considered, meeting these challenges is paramount, not to mention the need to continue upgrading and maintaining existing assets.
Doing this will require heavy and sustained investment, as well as sensible regulation, good governance and accountability in order to provide best value to consumers.
Hence, one of the central arguments that’s put forward in ICE’s paper states that whether services are in public or private ownership, consideration must be given to these investment requirements and how they are to be best delivered.
You can download the report at: https://www.ice.org.uk/ICEDevelopmentWebPortal/media/Documents/Media/Policy/nationalisation-discussion-paper.pdf
This article was written by David Hawkes, ICE Policy Manager. It originally appeared as ‘Nationalisation of infrastructure: what could this mean for the sector?’ at: https://www.ice.org.uk/news-and-insight/the-infrastructure-blog/november-2018/implications-of-infrastructure-nationalisation
--The Institution of Civil Engineers
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Breaking Barriers in Infrastructure - perspectives from the profession
- Brexit - The case for infrastructure.
- Government construction and infrastructure pipelines.
- Green infrastructure.
- Growth and Infrastructure Act.
- ICE articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- Infrastructure.
- Infrastructure and Projects Authority.
- Infrastructure UK (IUK).
- London infrastructure plan.
- National Infrastructure Pipeline.
- National Infrastructure Plan.
- Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects.
- Smart cities.
- The Institution of Civil Engineers.
- Traffic and transport.
- Union Connectivity Review calls for UK-wide strategic transport network.
- Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail.
Featured articles and news
Deputy editor of AT, Tim Fraser, discusses the newly formed society with its current chair, Chris Halligan MCIAT.
Barratt Lo-E passivhaus standard homes planned enmasse
With an initial 728 Lo-E homes across two sites and many more planned for the future.
Government urged to uphold Warm Homes commitment
ECA and industry bodies write to Government concerning its 13.2 billion Warm Homes manifesto commitment.
Places of Worship in Britain and Ireland, 1929-1990. Book review.
The emancipation of women in art.
CIOB Construction Manager of the Year 2025
Just one of the winners at the CIOB Awards 2025.
Call for independent National Grenfell oversight mechanism
MHCLG share findings of Building Safety Inquiry in letter to Secretary of State and Minister for Building Safety.
The Architectural Technology Awards
AT Awards now open for this the sixth decade of CIAT.
50th Golden anniversary ECA Edmundson awards
Deadline for submissions Friday 30 May 2025.
The benefits of precast, off-site foundation systems
Top ten benefits of this notable innovation.
Encouraging individuals to take action saving water at home, work, and in their communities.
Takes a community to support mental health and wellbeing
The why of becoming a Mental Health Instructor explained.
Mental health awareness week 13-18 May
The theme is communities, they can provide a sense of belonging, safety, support in hard times, and a sense purpose.
Mental health support on the rise but workers still struggling
CIOB Understanding Mental Health in the Built Environment 2025 shows.
Design and construction material libraries
Material, sample, product or detail libraries a key component of any architectural design practice.
Construction Products Reform Green Paper and Consultation
Still time to respond as consultation closes on 21 May 2025.
Resilient façade systems for smog reduction in Shanghai
A technical approach using computer simulation and analysis of solar radiation, wind patterns, and ventilation.