How to make projects off-site ready
In 2019, UK government departments will favour bids for construction contracts that offer off-site manufacturing. Gavin White and Andrew Mather of Ramboll offer guidance to civil engineers on how to make projects ‘off-site ready’.
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
Off-site construction encompasses a huge range of disciplines and systems. From factory made concrete, steel and cross-laminated timber components to facade units complete with windows and balconies and modular plant rooms.
However, understanding the off-site benefits for a particular project can be challenging – and only fully realised through a co-ordinated and detailed approach.
While knowledge of off-site construction has been developing in the industry for many years, it remains a diverse and fragmented market.
Realising the benefits of off-site manufacturing for a particular project requires a project-specific, holistic review based on important lessons learned over the past decade.
[edit] Understanding constraints
Off-site construction will only deliver value if its constraints are fully understood and lead the design approach.
These constraints can be of manufacture, handling, transportation, lifting or installation, or project site-specific criteria.
Each part is important and should not be overlooked to avoid expensive bespoke solutions late in the project.
The constraints of off-site construction must also be considered holistically by all engineering disciplines. Acoustics, daylight assessments, sustainability criteria, facade details, and more must all be developed closely with the architectural, structural and mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) designs from an early stage.
Furthermore, the technical design must align with the procurement, cash flow, supplier availability and client’s funding mechanism.
[edit] Off-site reviews
Understanding constraints and involving all disciplines are the basis of Ramboll’s project-specific ‘off-site reviews’ that we are now offering for free on their website.
These are in-depth holistic reviews to find the right off-site systems for a project and culminates in a score for how ‘off-site ready’ the project is. This provides an immediate and comparable indication of the relative merits of different techniques.
A recent example application is the Victoria Quarter in Ashford, Kent. This residential development by Neighbour consists of seven buildings of six to seven storeys, with the majority of flat layouts standardised.
Taking into account the client’s aims for the site and key drivers, Ramboll used digital tools linked to their off-site technical database to undertake rapid option assessment of the building forms for the site, ranging from in situ concrete floors, walls and columns to fully fitted steel-frame modules. A master planning tool then determined the off-site approaches that best aligned with the client’s needs.
Alongside technical analysis, the overall approaches to off-site construction were also assessed, including procurement, Building Information Modelling (BIM) and design collaboration, to highlight opportunities for further value. This was compared with industry peers in the project’s off-site-ready score, with benchmarks and further details on how to maximise value.
[edit] Conclusion
Construction is changing, with higher standards expected and improvements in delivery time of 50% demanded by the UK government in its Construction 2025 industrial strategy.
The housing shortage fuels the need for change, while regulation and industry adoption of BIM create opportunities for data-driven construction techniques.
Off-site construction and digital design are well-placed to deliver in this space. Indeed, in last year’s Autumn Budget, chancellor Philip Hammond said government departments will, ‘adopt a presumption in favour of offsite construction by 2019’ (ref. HM Treasury, 2017).
Market-leading developers and new disruptors alike are already targeting the off-site market – the rest of construction industry now needs to keep up.
This article was originally published here by ICE on 9 August 2018. It was written by Gavin White and Andrew Mather.
--The Institution of Civil Engineers
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Futurebuild and UK Construction Week London Unite
Creating the UK’s Built Environment Super Event and over 25 other key partnerships.
Welsh and Scottish 2026 elections
Manifestos for the built environment for upcoming same May day elections.
Advancing BIM education with a competency framework
“We don’t need people who can just draw in 3D. We need people who can think in data.”
Guidance notes to prepare for April ERA changes
From the Electrical Contractors' Association Employee Relations team.
Significant changes to be seen from the new ERA in 2026 and 2027, starting on 6 April 2026.
First aid in the modern workplace with St John Ambulance.
Ireland's National Residential Retrofit Plan
Staged initiatives introduced step by step.
Solar panels, pitched roofs and risk of fire spread
60% increase in solar panel fires prompts tests and installation warnings.
Modernising heat networks with Heat interface unit
Why HIUs hold the key to efficiency upgrades.
Reflecting on the work of the CIOB Academy
Looking back on 2025 and where it's going next.
Procurement in construction: Knowledge hub
Brief, overview, key articles and over 1000 more covering procurement.
Sir John Betjeman’s love of Victorian church architecture.
Exchange for Change for UK deposit return scheme
The UK Deposit Management Organisation established to deliver Deposit Return Scheme unveils trading name.
A guide to integrating heat pumps
As the Future Homes Standard approaches Future Homes Hub publishes hints and tips for Architects and Architectural Technologists.
BSR as a standalone body; statements, key roles, context
Statements from key figures in key and changing roles.
Resident engagement as the key to successful retrofits
Retrofit is about people, not just buildings, from early starts to beyond handover.