The Energy Act 2011 included provisions for the 'Green Deal', a Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) initiative offering a mechanism for funding energy efficiency improvements. Instead of paying up-front to have energy efficiency measures installed in a property, the cost was funded by long-term savings on electricity bills. The Green Deal was launched in autumn 2012, but financing did not become available until January 2013.
Under the scheme, a 'green deal provider' financed the up-front costs, and the consumer's energy supplier added a 'green deal charge' to the consumer’s bill. The 'golden rule' was that this charge must be less than (or at least no more than) the savings in the consumers bill resulting from the energy efficient measures installed. As a consequence, the consumer’s overall bill should be the same, or lower than it was before the energy efficiency measures were installed.
The Green Deal charge was ‘attached’ to the meter, so if the property was sold, the purchaser took on the charge. The deal remained with the meter even if the energy supplier changed.
To obtain energy efficiency measures through the Green Deal, consumers first arranged for an assessment by an accredited green deal assessor (this might be arranged by a green deal provider). They carried out an assessment of the property and the way it was used, then proposed a package of energy efficiency measures for the property and predicted the likely energy savings that would result. A green deal provider would then offer a green deal plan to the consumer, outlining the energy efficient measures that they would finance and the resulting green deal payment that would be added to their future energy bills. If the consumer agreed, an accredited installer would implement the measures. The consumers energy supplier would then add a green deal charge to their energy bill.
The range of energy efficiency measures that might qualify under the Green Deal included:
- Loft insulation.
- Solid wall insulation.
- Cavity wall insulation.
- Draught insulation.
- Double glazing.
- Wind turbines.
- Water-source heat pumps.
- Air-source heat pumps.
- Ground-source heat pumps.
- Solar blinds, shutters and shading devices.
- Door insulation.
- Smart meters.
- Thermal and photo voltaic panels.
- Biomass boilers.
- Controls for heating ventilation and air-conditioning.
- Radiant heating.
The pay-back period for domestic properties could not exceed the length of time the improvements lasted. For non-domestic properties, the pay-back period could be shorter, to allow payback within the lease period. This was because, unlike the domestic sector, energy use may vary significantly between successive users of a non-domestic property.
In June 2014, the Green Deal was supplemented by a Green Deal Home Improvement Fund (GDHIF). The Green Deal Home Improvement Fund provided up to £7,600 for domestic energy customers and was designed to work alongside Green Deal finance although householders were not required to use Green Deal finance to qualify for the GDHIF. See Green Deal Home Improvement Fund for more information.
Some critics suggested that the calculations underpinning predicted savings were too optimistic. To predict savings, costs had to be estimated, and these are dependent not only on the use of the property, but also the long-term price of energy and the details of the specific tariff the consumer signs up to. The Department of Energy and Climate Change itself said that...
….actual cash savings cannot be guaranteed by government since no-one except individuals and businesses themselves can control how much energy they actually consume in their own property.
Other issues included:
- The interest rate that green deal providers charged for financing (perhaps 6-10%), and whether householders would be better to finance improvements themselves.
- Concerns about whether the Green Deal would simply allow expensive energy efficiency measures to be installed on properties that were already fairly efficient, whilst not being taken up on properties where very simple and low-cost measures had yet to be installed.
- The quality and cost of assessors.
- The quality of installers.
- Concerns about the applicability of assessment and retrofitting techniques to some of the UK's 'traditional' building stock (pre 1919), which behave differently in relation to ventilation and moisture than more modern buildings. Ref Responsible Retrofit of Traditional Buildings, the Sustainable Traditional Buildings Alliance.
In September 2014, the Energy and Climate Change Committee published Energy and Climate Change - Third Report The Green Deal: watching brief (part 2). This criticised the Green Deal, proposing that, '... the Government must re-evaluate its approach and set out a clear strategy to revive the failing scheme. Unless the package is made more attractive to a wider group of consumers, Green Deal finance is likely to remain unappealing to many.'
On 23 July 2015, Climate Change Secretary Amber Rudd announced that there would be no further funding to the Green Deal Finance Company and that the Government would stop any future funding releases of the Green Deal Home Improvement Fund. This was described as a move to protect taxpayers following low take-up and concerns about industry standards. Ref Gov.uk. The announcement did not impact on existing Green Deal Finance Plans or Green Deal Home Improvement Fund applications or vouchers.
The Framework to support the programme, remains in place to service existing Green Deal Plans and for any private finance providers wishing to enter the market.
Rudd suggested that the Government would work with the building industry and consumer groups on a new value-for-money approach, but that future schemes must provide better value for money, supporting the goal of insulating a million more homes over the next five years and the Government’s commitment to tackle fuel poverty.
See Green Deal scrapped for more information.
On 14 April 2016, the National Audit Office (NAO) published Green Deal and Energy Company Obligation, in which it concluded that the Green Deal had not achieved value for money, had cost taxpayers £240 million and had not generated additional energy savings. This, it suggested, was because the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) had not persuaded householders that energy efficiency measures were worth paying for.
In October 2017, a Call for Evidence was published alongside the Government’s Clean Growth Strategy. The call for evidence is intended to improve knowledge of stakeholders’ views on the Green Deal Framework and whether there is scope for changing it to better support needs.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Air source heat pumps.
- Climate change science.
- Domestic micro-generation.
- Emission rates.
- Energy Act.
- Energy certificates.
- Energy company obligation.
- Energy performance contracts.
- Energy targets.
- Feed in tariff.
- Green building.
- Green Deal Consultation.
- Green Deal Home Improvement Fund.
- Green Deal scrapped.
- NAO report into the Green Deal and Energy Company Obligation.
- Renewable energy.
- Renewable heat incentive.
- Simple payback.
- Zero carbon homes.
- Zero carbon non domestic buildings.
 External references
- Gov.uk Green Deal.
- DECC, The Green Deal: A summary of the governments proposals.
- Responsible Retrofit of Traditional Buildings, the Sustainable Traditional Buildings Alliance.
- The Energy Act 2011
- BRE: The green deal.
- Statement from Energy and Climate Change Minister Greg Barker on the latest Green Deal statistics. 11 April 2013
Featured articles and news
What will the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) mean for you when they come into force in May?
Business Secretary chairs a new taskforce to monitor and advise on mitigating the impacts of Carillion’s liquidation.
Sir John Armitt is appointed the new chair of the National Infrastructure Commission.
High quality and high density homes - is it what we need or is it storing up trouble?
Government announces its intention to strengthen planning rules to protect music venues and neighbours.
National Audit Office reports that there is little evidence that PFI offers better value than other forms of contracting.
What is liquidation and how does it apply to contractors in the construction industry?
Scrutiny is placed on Carillion's controversial 2013 decision to extend subcontractor payment terms to 120 days.
RSHP unveil their involvement in a boundary crossing which will provide a new entry point into Hong Kong.
With PFI currently under the spotlight due to Carillion, this introductory article explains what they are.
Estimates suggest that up to 30,000 small firms could be at risk of non-payment as a result of Carillion's collapse.