Owen Hatherley - Landscapes of Communism
 Owen Hatherley – ‘Landscapes of Communism: A History Through Buildings’
Published by Allen Lane
Ask what they envisage when confronted with the title ‘Landscapes of Communism’ and it’s safe to assume that unforgiving rows of harsh concrete blocks will be blockading the preconceptions of most people. It is a credit then to Owen Hatherley’s guide that these preconceptions are both justified and challenged, allowing for a genuinely interesting exploration of the architecture of Eastern Europe and the powers that inspired it.
Since publishing his polemical book of essays ‘Militant Modernism’ in 2009, Hatherley has become a strident and unflinching commentator on the built environment and urban planning, lauded by writers such as Will Self and Phillip Pullman.
His second book ‘A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain’ was a fearsome and damning indictment of the hallmarks of New Labour’s architectural legacy – all the ill-advised PFI schemes, soulless Enterprise Zones and regeneration projects that proliferated through the country from Manchester to Tyneside to Greenwich. He sought to make sense of the vacuum left by postmodernism in the new millennium, and in so doing spared nothing in his witty and acerbic critique of the endless high rise apartment buildings with their barcode-facades and ubiquitous cladding; buildings that were designed apparently only with their CAD logo or moniker (‘Cheesegrater’, ‘The Pinnacle’, etc.) in mind.
With ‘Landscapes of Communism’ there is a sense of Hatherley’s growing maturity as a writer and thinker about place and what both defines and informs it. This could perhaps be due to him stepping away from his comfort zone and onto, literally, foreign territory, but there’s also his apparent awareness that real history and real people’s experiences are suffused within his chosen subject matter.
Ever since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the ‘victory’ of Western capitalism as an ideological ‘design for life’, communism as a concept has become steadily more toxic and confused. In the space of a week, Prime Minister Cameron can deride front bench opposition politicians as ‘communists’ and also amiably sup a pint of ale while vying to do business with Xi Jinping, leader of the Chinese Communist Party.
Being an unapologetic Marxist, Hatherley spends a brief period of time upfront laying out his political baggage for the reader’s inspection so as to not be unduly distracted by any perceived historical bias further down the line. Such precaution is welcome but not entirely necessary, as he offers a very balanced guide to the communist states and societies, never veering towards the slightest reverence.
Hatherley is at his best when describing his tour of the Moscow Metro, the opulent ‘palaces for the workers’, or exploring the microrayon (housing estate) districts of Kiev, Warsaw, Budapest and Ljubljana. He explains the odd competition to construct TV towers ever taller, the Stalinist monumental structures aiming to symbolize the power of the state, and the sweeping Haussmann-esque boulevards. The biggest surprise of the book comes from learning the extent to which the communist states sought to reconstruct old historical centres that had been devastated by WW2, confounding the common belief that their impact was entirely modernist and transformative.
The only shortcomings of the book arise in what Hatherley chooses to leave out, which are understandable but nonetheless prohibit the book from being a fully comprehensive guide. There is no discussion of Cuban architecture, for instance, and China is only touched upon briefly towards the end, which at any rate could probably inform another 500-page book in and of itself.
One could also understand Hatherley’s desire to avoid ‘ruins’ in favour of aspects of the built environment that are still functional and part of people’s everyday experiences, but it’s an odd choice not to at least remark upon Chernobyl, the communist city frozen in time by radiation fallout, and which served as a devastating nail in the Soviet Union’s coffin. There is also rather too little engagement or interaction with local people who may have served to offer unique perspectives of what the architecture means to them in a post-Communist Europe, and how their day-to-day lived experience is shaped by a built environment that still echoes with the influence of those former powers.
This book is a fascinating examination of the communist impact on Europe’s architectural history and Hatherley serves as an intelligent and insightful narrator as we follow him through the city spaces he traverses. Indeed, long may he continue to deconstruct the follies of the built environment with his pen as an erudite wrecking ball.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Abandoned movie theatres in Russia.
- Architectural styles.
- British post-war mass housing.
- Brutalist London Map - review.
- Charles Waldheim - Landscape as Urbanism: A General Theory.
- Constructivist architecture.
- 'England's Post-War Listed Buildings'.
- Habitat 67.
- Imagine Moscow exhibition.
- James Crawford - Fallen Glory.
- Landscapes of human exploitation.
- Last Futures: Nature, Technology and the End of Architecture.
- Ministry of Transportation Building, Georgia.
- Nowa Huta - Communist tour review.
- Palace of Culture and Science.
- Sink estate regeneration plans.
- The Kremlin.
The IHBC will soon launch this support service for those commercial historic environment practices that formally recognise the IHBC’s standards in conservation.
The Branch has offered ‘Written evidence to the Scottish Parliament's Finance and Constitution Committee on the Planning (Scotland) Bill Financial Memorandum.
Lake District zip wire plan condemned by peers.
‘Towards a European vision of high-quality Baukultur’, ‘includes not only the result of… actual construction, but also the processes that lead up to it.’
Draft revised National Planning Policy Framework allows an extra two floors to be added to a property provided it is in keeping with the roofline of other buildings in the area.