- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 29 Sep 2021
Exclusion grounds under the Single Procurement Document (Scotland)
The Single Procurement Document (Scotland) - also referred to as SPD (Scotland) - is a document that contains questions used at the selection stage for post-Brexit procurement exercises in Scotland. It is used to identify suitably qualified and experienced bidders for public sector procurement in Scotland.
The Procurement Journey portion of the Scottish Government’s procurement guidance website offers guidance for public sector buyers who procure goods, services and care and support services under SPD (Scotland).
 Route 3
Procurement officers involved in high value or complex purchases (typically of, or more than £50,000 excluding VAT for goods and services) should follow the guidance offered in Route 3 of the Procurement Journey. This includes strict procedures and rules, including circumstances in which a bidder must be excluded from the procurement process. This is known as a mandatory exclusion ground. There are other circumstances in which a bidder may be excluded on a case by case basis. These are known as discretionary exclusion grounds.
All exclusion criteria must be relevant and proportionate to the subject matter of the contract.
 Determining the parameters of exclusion
The exclusion process involves evaluating whether the bidder has committed any offences.
There are two types of questions that can be asked when determining whether or not there are grounds for exclusion questions:
- Mandatory exclusions. The buyer must ask questions regarding these exclusions and the bidder may be excluded from the procurement process if specified offences have been committed and the self-cleansing measures taken are not sufficient to demonstrate reliability. Examples of such instances might include corruption, bribery, money laundering or certain types of fraud. They may also include tax and social security obligations (binding decision - judicial or administrative).
- Discretionary exclusion. The buyer may ask questions concerning these exclusions and the bidder may be excluded from the procurement process if they have taken part in certain activities and the self-cleansing measures taken are not sufficient to demonstrate reliability. These should be considered on a case by case basis by the buying organisation. Examples of such instances might include social, environmental and labour laws or obligations, bankruptcy or insolvent businesses, incidents of grave professional misconduct, conflicts of interest, distortion of competition and contract deficiencies, or misrepresentation or undue influence. They may also include tax and social security obligations (decision by means other than a binding judicial or administrative decision).
In either mandatory or discretionary exclusion grounds based on tax and social security breaches, the bidder should not be excluded if they have fulfilled their obligations by paying or entered into a binding agreement with the view to paying monies due or the obligation to repay otherwise ceases.
 What is self cleansing?
According to the Construction Procurment Handbook Glossary, self cleansing is: ‘The process by which candidates which have been excluded from a procurement process can demonstrate that they have taken action to remedy and areas which were the cause of their exclusion.’
- Paid, or undertaken to pay, compensation for any damage caused by the criminal offence or misconduct.
- Provided detailed facts and circumstances by collaborating with the investigating authorities.
- Taken appropriate concrete technical, organisational and personnel measures to prevent further criminal offences or misconduct.
 Extenuating circumstances
In exceptional circumstances, it may be possible to disregard the mandatory exclusion grounds when selecting a bidder. This can only be done where there are overriding reasons relating to the public interest. This provision is known as derogation from the mandatory exclusion considerations.
This allows buying organisations to respond to unforeseen emergency circumstances. An example may be where urgently needed emergency equipment can only be purchased from a bidder to whom one of the mandatory exclusion grounds otherwise applies.
 Related articles
- Dynamic purchasing system under the Single Procurement Document (Scotland).
- Procurement route.
- Public procurement.
- Single Procurement Document (Scotland).
- Tender processes for construction contracts.
- Typical tender process for construction projects.
- Unfair contract terms act.
Featured articles and news
Heritage protection in England vs Australia.
Three-quarters of fire doors fail inspections
The role of geoparks, biospheres and world heritage sites.
Just one month to go ! Find out more here.
A new gallery for the University of Huddersfield.
What will it take to stop it ?
To celebrate world bee day 2022 !
Not forgetting part F and the new part overheating part O.
As energy prices jump up in cost.
With people in the UK from Ukraine.
Industry leader Steve Murray takes on role.
An abundant and versatile building material.
600,000 heat pump installations targeted per year by 2028.
Helping prevent those unwanted outcomes.
How has transport changed due to Covid-19 ?
Will you need it ? after June 15 and the new Part O ?
Create an account and write the first of many articles.
CIAT commentary after the first meeting.
Who is to blame?
Research recommends focussing on portfolio success rather than project success.