- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 22 Feb 2018
Disruption claims in construction
If disruption is caused by the employer, the contractor may have grounds to seek compensation. Disruption, and claims arising to try and recoup losses incurred from it, are common on construction projects, particularly on larger and more complex projects.
The difference between disruption and delay is that the latter relates to lateness rather than productivity, although they can often be related. Delays can cause disruptions, and vice versa. Despite their inter-relation, they require a different approach to assessing claims.
When evaluating claims for delay, the terms of the specific contract are the usual starting point, and evidence is required that certain circumstances caused the delay. The terms of the contract are less useful when evaluating disruption claims. Instead, the contractor must provide reasonable evidence that:
- Progress of the works has been disrupted.
- Which element of the works and which trades have been disrupted, why losses occurred, and so on.
- The disruption incurred additional costs.
- The cause of the disruption constitutes a breach of contract.
Evidence will normally take the form of documented records demonstrating that disruption caused losses. However, this can prove difficult as the contractor can often not detect disruption until after it has occurred. In addition, isolating the loss of productivity to the cause of the disruption can be difficult as it may coincide with several other factors, and the effect of the disruption may be hidden by other issues.
- Measured mile analysis: Compares actual labour performance between two periods – a normal measured mile period and an impacted period.
- Baseline productivity analysis: A more conservative estimate used when an unimpacted section of the works is too difficult to isolate.
- Earned value analysis: Compares the amount and cost of work that was planned to have been done by a particular stage with the amount that has actually been done and what it has actually cost.
NB The term ‘disruption’ can also refer to the impact of new technologies and techniques on an industry. For more information, see Construction is an industry ripe for tech disruption.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
After 6 years, the Metropolitan Police admit they supplied information to the construction workers blacklist.
It's nearly two years since level 2 BIM was made a minimum requirement on certain public projects. But what actually is it?
Renowned water expert Prof. Martin van Veelen challenges political leaders to do more on safe and clean water supplies.
Inquiry criticises PwC for "milking the Carillion cow dry".
A recent roundtable discussed the future of transport in the UK – including the role of connected and autonomous vehicles.
Architects report cancelled projects and uncertainty concerns in a new RIBA survey on Brexit.
Quality helps eliminate defects, but it can also drive improvement and increase profit.
PII provides insurance cover against negligence claims and is widely used where services are being provided.
Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners release first images of their planned new addition to the Toronto skyline.
Land which is, or was, occupied by a permanent structure; brownfield sites can have significant development potential.
An innovative 'green bench' is installed in London that absorbs as much pollution as 275 trees.