Brick tax
King George III introduced a brick tax in Great Britain in 1784. Bricks were initially taxed at 2s 6d per thousand.
The brick tax was imposed as a means of raising revenue for the government, which was burdened by the costs of the American War of Independence and ongoing military expenditure. The tax applied to each brick manufactured, effectively increasing the cost of construction materials across the country.
Builders and architects responded in various ways to minimise the financial impact of the tax. Some resorted to producing larger bricks, thereby reducing the number needed for a given structure and lowering the overall tax liability. Others experimented with alternative building materials, including timber, stone, and earth, leading to a noticeable shift in construction practices in certain regions. The quality and uniformity of bricks also suffered, as manufacturers sought to cut costs while remaining within the bounds of the law.
The brick tax influenced the appearance of towns and cities, as decorative brickwork became less common due to its additional expense. Simple, plain facades became the norm, and the visual character of Georgian architecture was altered in areas where brick was the dominant building material. The tax remained in place for more than sixty years, only being repealed in 1850, but its effects on construction techniques and urban aesthetics were felt long after its abolition.
During its existence, the brick tax became a symbol of government interference in everyday life and was widely unpopular among builders and homeowners alike. Historical accounts suggest that some manufacturers even resorted to clandestine methods to evade the tax, such as smuggling bricks or underreporting quantities, highlighting the tensions between regulation and practical necessity in the built environment.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
Building Safety recap January, 2026
What we missed at the end of last year, and at the start of this...
National Apprenticeship Week 2026, 9-15 Feb
Shining a light on the positive impacts for businesses their apprentices and the wider economy alike.
Applications and benefits of acoustic flooring
From commercial to retail.
From solid to sprung and ribbed to raised.
Strengthening industry collaboration in Hong Kong
Hong Kong Institute of Construction and The Chartered Institute of Building sign Memorandum of Understanding.
A detailed description fron the experts at Cornish Lime.
IHBC planning for growth with corporate plan development
Grow with the Institute by volunteering and CP25 consultation.
Connecting ambition and action for designers and specifiers.
Electrical skills gap deepens as apprenticeship starts fall despite surging demand says ECA.
Built environment bodies deepen joint action on EDI
B.E.Inclusive initiative agree next phase of joint equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) action plan.
Recognising culture as key to sustainable economic growth
Creative UK Provocation paper: Culture as Growth Infrastructure.
Futurebuild and UK Construction Week London Unite
Creating the UK’s Built Environment Super Event and over 25 other key partnerships.
Welsh and Scottish 2026 elections
Manifestos for the built environment for upcoming same May day elections.
Advancing BIM education with a competency framework
“We don’t need people who can just draw in 3D. We need people who can think in data.”
Guidance notes to prepare for April ERA changes
From the Electrical Contractors' Association Employee Relations team.
Significant changes to be seen from the new ERA in 2026 and 2027, starting on 6 April 2026.
First aid in the modern workplace with St John Ambulance.
Solar panels, pitched roofs and risk of fire spread
60% increase in solar panel fires prompts tests and installation warnings.
Modernising heat networks with Heat interface unit
Why HIUs hold the key to efficiency upgrades.
























