- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 07 Mar 2017
The history of non-domestic air tightness testing
In the 1980s BSRIA (Building Services Research and Information Association) undertook a project to develop a method of measuring natural ventilation in large buildings. The research indicated that actual air change rates were often greater than those assumed in the CIBSE Guide. However the database was too small to reach any definitive conclusions.
The technique did not lend itself well to large scale surveys. Typically for a single cell building it would require two man days to install the equipment, 8 – 10 hours to undertake the test, and a further day to dismantle the sampling tubes. During this test procedure large quantities of tracer gas were used, which had to be transported around the country, and after four days one measurement would have been recorded for one internal – external temperature difference, and for given wind speed and direction. While it provided some data, it was difficult to use to compare different buildings. Clearly, an alternative method was required.
During the measurement of ventilation rates of dwellings, the air leakage of different dwelling types had been measured using a pressurisation technique. It was a natural progression to develop this technique to measure the air leakage of larger buildings.
It was quickly appreciated that significant air flow rates would be required, and that any equipment would need to be readily transportable, capable of being attached to a double doorway, and self-contained. Nigel Potter, who was the project engineer in charge, knew that Land Rovers were sometimes used to power agricultural machinery using a power take-off. Further investigation however indicated that the power used was much less than that required for the proposed mobile fan.
After some discussion Land Rover agreed to upgrade the power train, with the then largest engine for the Land Rover, a 3500cc petrol. However this was not straightforward: the power take-off shaft was re-routed to emerge at the rear of the vehicle, which was where the petrol tank was located. Two tanks were therefore installed under the front seats of the vehicle, but this was where the battery was, so this was moved to beneath a bench seat at the rear of the vehicle.
Eventually both fan and vehicle were ready for use, and the BSRIA laboratories were used as a trial. During one of these trials representatives of Land Rover attended, and appeared quite content until they looked beneath the vehicle and saw a red hot exhaust.
With some minor modifications the vehicle was ready and a survey of 12 industrial buildings was carried out. This confirmed the earlier finding using the tracer gas results that natural ventilation rates within this type of building were generally greater than those suggested for sizing heating systems. It was clear that a robust method of establishing the air leakage of different sizes of buildings was required.
Various methods of normalising the air flow rate required to pressurise a building to 50 Pa were investigated, and after some deliberation the surface area of the walls and roof was used and the air leakage index was introduced. One of the reasons this was chosen was that most commercial buildings have concrete floors, which, it was surmised, would have a very low air leakage, and the air supplied would therefore be egressing from the rest of the structure. In devising this parameter, there was never any distinction made between a ground bearing concrete slab, and a ‘suspended’ concrete slab.
A second survey was commissioned to investigate the air leakage of offices, and again this proved that quoted natural ventilation rates were too low. One person described it as a lottery as to whether the building constructed would have reasonable air tightness. A second survey was commissioned by BRE, for office buildings, increasing the size of the database. This further demonstrated that the magnitude of air leakage of office buildings (and hence the natural ventilation rate) was generally greater than design values quoted by CIBSE design information. Almost all of this work was part funded by the Department of the Environment, but after this survey, pressurisation testing started to be used commercially.
Initially this was to assist in identifying problems with a building, normally where the heating was failing to maintain the required air temperature and building services consultants started specifying air leakage rates for buildings. At this stage, reduction in energy consumption was not the main priority, but rather ensuring that buildings would perform as intended. Sometimes it was enhanced performance that was sought: a major retailer wanted to remove revolving and bi-parting doors, so that customers could enter their stores more easily, and to ensure the necessary low air leakage, all its new buildings were tested well before any regulatory requirements.
With the increasing demand, a Mark II Fan Rover was built, and the trailer re-designed so it no longer had to be disconnected and turned around to attach to the building and the Land Rover was changed to a 4 litre Discovery.
In 2002 air leakage testing was included within Approved Document Part L2A for non-domestic buildings, but this resulted in only about 30% of new buildings being tested. In 2006 it was included within the regulations themselves and it became mandatory for tests to be undertaken on all new non-domestic buildings and a sample of new dwellings. The parameter chosen was air permeability, i.e. including the ground bearing floor area.
The regulations have certainly had an effect – reducing permeability in non-domestic buildings from 30 – 40 m3/m2/hr to a typical 4-5 m3/m2/hr. Significant carbon and energy have been saved, engineers have the reassurance that their design intent is being met and occupants are more comfortable.
This article originally appeared in the December 2014 edition of BSRIA’s Delta T magazine. It was written by Tom Jones, Technical Manager, Air Tightness. It has been posted here by --BSRIA 09:37, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Air change rates.
- Air infiltration.
- Air permeability testing.
- Air tightness in buildings.
- At a glance - Indoor air quality.
- Building services compliance with the building regulations.
- Building Research Establishment.
- Building Regulations.
- Domestic ventilation systems performance.
- Draughts in buildings.
- Performance gap.
- Simplified Building Energy Model.
- Thermographic survey.
Featured articles and news
EIRs define what is needed from the employer's internal team and suppliers for project development.
The full keynote speech by Sir James Bevan, Environment Agency CEO, on the future of flood protection.
After 6 years, the Metropolitan Police admit they supplied information to the construction workers blacklist.
It's nearly two years since level 2 BIM was made a minimum requirement on certain public projects. But what actually is it?
Renowned water expert Prof. Martin van Veelen challenges political leaders to do more on safe and clean water supplies.
Inquiry criticises PwC for "milking the Carillion cow dry".
A recent roundtable discussed the future of transport in the UK – including the role of connected and autonomous vehicles.
Architects report cancelled projects and uncertainty concerns in a new RIBA survey on Brexit.
Quality helps eliminate defects, but it can also drive improvement and increase profit.
PII provides insurance cover against negligence claims and is widely used where services are being provided.
Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners release first images of their planned new addition to the Toronto skyline.