Profits method of rating valuation
Contents |
[edit] Use
Some properties are of a type which are rarely let in the open market, and therefore there is insufficient rental evidence to reach a reliable valuation. Where such a property is used as a profit-making business, it may be possible to use the profits method. (This is sometimes called the accounts method.)
The profits method is used in the absence of rental evidence, and where there is a sufficient element of legal or factual monopoly, provided that the valuer feels the occupier’s accounts provide a reasonable guide. A modified profits test is applied to public houses, theatres and cinemas.
Legal monopoly exists where a licence is required to use the hereditament (eg Sandown Park Racecourse).
Factual monopoly exists where the hereditament clearly exhibits something unique about the trading concern and its location (eg Milford Haven Dock and Harbour Co).
Historic houses were considered in Hoare (VO) v National Trust (1997) and National Trust v Spratling (VO) (1997). The Lands Tribunal found that the National Trust was the only potential hypothetical tenant of a historic house (Petworth in West Sussex, and Castle Drogo in Cornwall). Having regard to the profits basis of assessment, the costs of repair and administration made the occupation of the hereditament unprofitable. Nonetheless, the Lands Tribunal held that it could have regard to the Trust’s overall financial resources, and its motive to preserve historic houses. The Lands Tribunal concluded that the National Trust would be prepared to pay a positive rent for the benefit (in terms of its motives) of occupying the hereditaments.
Although the Court of Appeal went on to reverse the Lands Tribunal’s decision, holding that the National Trust would not be prepared to pay a rent in addition to taking on the responsibility for repairs of the hereditament, the profits method was still applied. The Court of Appeal found that only a nominal value was appropriate under the profits method.
[edit] Principles
The principle behind this method is the ability of the property to provide the tenant with an income from their occupation that will compensate them sufficiently for operating the concern, and, in addition, provide them a surplus which they would be prepared to pay for the right to occupy the hereditament - ie rent. Having found the rent, this will be the rateable value - remember, the statutory definition of rateable value is an open market rent.
The method consists of taking the gross income from the concern and deducting purchases to produce gross profits. Net profit is then derived by deducting working expenses and repairs and renewals.
When valuing to RV, it is possible to use a sinking fund to replace the building in place of repairs to the structure. The method in such cases becomes:
£ | £ | |
Gross receipts Less purchases |
||
Less |
£ |
From the net profit, or ‘divisible balance’, it was mandatory (following the House of Lords decision in Railway Assessment Authority v Southern Railway Co (1936)) to deduct the tenant’s share to cover their remuneration, risk and interest on their capital. This was frequently taken as a percentage of the capital employed by the tenant (say 15 percent). In recent years, however, particularly where divisible balances are small, it has been customary to deduct from the divisible balance interest on tenant’s capital (at a rate percent which they might obtain by placing the sum in a secure investment such as a building society). The remainder is then divided between the landlord and the tenant on an unspecified basis - frequently 50 percent each. The landlord’s share is the rent and, by definition, will be the rateable value.
[edit] Example 5
You are instructed by your client, the lessee and occupier of a licensed hotel in a prominent position in a busy provincial town, to give your opinion of a fair rating assessment for the 2000 list.
The premises are held on a full repairing and insuring lease for 21 years, 8 years of which are unexpired, at £8000 per annum.
The last full year’s accounts available in the year prior to 1 April 2003 have been made known to you and from these you have extracted the following information:
Receipts: Restaurant Bar Stock: Consumable stock as at 1 January Consumable stock as at 31 December Purchases: Expenses: Wages, salaries and NI Rates (paid y/e 31 Mar 1998) Gas, electricity and solid fuel Laundry and household cleaning materials Advertising, stationery, postage and telephone Insurance (contents and third party) Repairs and renewals to furniture |
£ 113,420 250,500 127,230 . 52,000 48,000 . 224,260 . 107,170 14,120 16,000 16,720 13,470 5,910 1,750 1,850 13,150 9,420 9,000 |
The furniture and equipment were valued recently at £240,000 but they are insured for £300,000.
Notes:
Remember that although the accounts of the actual occupier are being used as a basis, the object is to draw up a set of accounts for the hypothetical tenant. Expenditure on rent must not be allowed as a working expense - this depends on the answer and is included in the divisible balance. Ground rent or mortgage interest would similarly be excluded, since the hypothetical tenant would not be paying them. Anything in the nature of tenant’s remuneration or interest on their capital is excluded because this too belongs to the divisible balance.
Remember too that the hypothetical tenant is a prudent businessman of average competence. To the extent that the actual occupier may be above or below this standard, some adjustment in the expenses may be justified.
The last complete year’s audited accounts before 1 April 2003 should provide the basis of the valuation, but the valuer may take into account:
- any changes in the hereditament or the surroundings between the date of the last accounts and the year in which the valuation entry goes into the list;
- any information from previous years’ accounts which indicate that a particular item in the accounts being used is not an average annual expenditure.
Valuation | £ | £ |
1 Calculate net profit Gross receipts Less Purchases Decrease in stock . Less Working expenses Wages, salaries and NI Gas, electricity, solid fuel Laundry etc Advertising, stationery etc Insurance (contents and third party) Repairs and renewals of furniture Repairs and insurance of buildings Net trading profit = divisible balance |
. . 224,260 4,000 . . . . . 107,170 16,720 13,470 5,910 1,850 14,120 13,150 10,990 |
. 491,150 . . 228,260- 262,890 . . . . . . . . . . 183,380- 79,510 |
2 Divide balance Less Interest on tenant’s capital Furniture and contents Stock - average Cash float . @ 7% Divisible balance |
. . . 240,000 50,000 20,000 310,000 |
. . . . . . . 21,700 57,810 |
Divisible balance is now apportioned as to:
Then if tenant’s share is 50 percent of the divisible balance:
Then if tenant’s share is 50 percent of the divisible balance:
Rent (1) = £28,905
RV= £28,905 (Rental value/rateable value/landlord’s share)
Notes:
(1) The figure to be calculated is 1 April 2003 rent.
It is instructive to note the expenses excluded in the calculation of the divisible balance. Purchases are adjusted by any increase or decrease in stock to find the effective total cost of stocks for the year.
The method used here, from net trading profit onwards, is the method approved by the Lands Tribunal in a number of cases. Interest of 5 and 7 percent on tenant’s capital is often used, reflecting current interest rates. 50 percent of the balance for tenant’s remuneration and risk is commonly used, although in this particular case it may be too large a reward to the tenant for running the business. Taking the total ‘tenant’s share’ we have:
Remuneration and risk |
£ 21,700 28,905 50,605 |
which is 10 percent of the gross receipts: a high percentage for a stable and profitable business.
Rates are treated as any other working expense. Actual rates are used if the rates paid in previous years form a reliable guide to the rates payable in future years. This approach was approved in Thomason v Rowland (VO) (1995).
This article was created by --University College of Estate Management (UCEM) 17:09, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.
CIOB photographic competition final images revealed
Art of Building produces stunning images for another year.
HSE prosecutes company for putting workers at risk
Roofing company fined and its director sentenced.
Strategic restructure to transform industry competence
EBSSA becomes part of a new industry competence structure.
Major overhaul of planning committees proposed by government
Planning decisions set to be fast-tracked to tackle the housing crisis.
Industry Competence Steering Group restructure
ICSG transitions to the Industry Competence Committee (ICC) under the Building Safety Regulator (BSR).
Principal Contractor Competency Certification Scheme
CIOB PCCCS competence framework for Principal Contractors.
The CIAT Principal Designer register
Issues explained via a series of FAQs.
Conservation in the age of the fourth (digital) industrial revolution.
Shaping the future of heritage
Embracing the evolution of economic thinking.
Ministers to unleash biggest building boom in half a century
50 major infrastructure projects, 5 billion for housing and 1.5 million homes.
RIBA Principal Designer Practice Note published
With key descriptions, best practice examples and FAQs, with supporting template resources.
Electrical businesses brace for project delays in 2025
BEB survey reveals over half worried about impact of delays.
Accelerating the remediation of buildings with unsafe cladding in England
The government publishes its Remediation Acceleration Plan.
Airtightness in raised access plenum floors
New testing guidance from BSRIA out now.