- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 22 Oct 2018
Prime contracting is a form of procurement in which the client enters into a relationship with a contractor who provides a single point of contact (prime contract) for a supply chain to deliver one or more projects.
This is one of the three procurement routes recommended by Government Construction Strategy for publicly-funded projects (where it is described as prime-type contracting), and came into favour in the late 1990s and 2000s following the recommendations of the Latham Report (Constructing the Team 1994) and particularly the Egan Report (Rethinking Construction 1998), which brought about a desire to reduce the number of suppliers that the government contracted directly. It was thought that simplifying the supply chain would result in better value for money.
 Range of meanings
Beyond this very broad definition, prime contracting is an unhelpfully vague term that encompasses a wide range of contracting methods. On the one hand, it can be used to describe a form of design and build that includes an element of facilities management, whilst on the other, it can be used to describe a long-term relationship between a client and a contractor to deliver a range of new projects as well as maintain the new estate and sometimes maintaining the existing estate.
Still more unhelpfully, prime contracting can be used to describe a single point responsibility delivery contract where the contractor is reimbursed subcontractor costs (prime costs) and a fee for overheads and profit (i.e. a prime cost contract, cost plus contract or cost reimbursement contract). See Prime cost contract for more information.
 Ministry of Defence
According to Defence Estates, ‘…a Prime Contractor is one having single point responsibility for the management and delivery of a project using a system of incentivisation and collaboration working to integrate the activities of its supply chain members to achieve a project that is on time, within budget and is in accordance with the specified outputs and is fit for purpose'
(Ref. Prime contracting on the MOD estate now archived.)
The Common Minimum Standards (referred to by the Government Construction Strategy) states that '...procurement routes should be limited to those which support integrated team working (PPP/PFI, Design & Build, the Prime-type Contracting approach and framework arrangements consistent with the Construction Strategy). Traditional, non-integrated procurement approaches should not be used unless it can be clearly shown that they offer best value for money – this means, in practice they will seldom be used..'.
… where a supply team is appointed with a single point lead who takes overall responsibility for the design and construction of the project and gives commitments on the operational costs of or takes responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the facility for a defined period' (ref. Common Minimum Standards P5).
Despite this confusion of definitions, different forms of prime contracting have certain common characteristics, benefits and difficulties.
Generally, prime contractors tend to be large construction companies with significant resources and access to the full supply chain, although in theory there is nothing to prevent a consultant or financing organisation from becoming a prime contractor.
Prime contracting requires early appointment of the contractor, before any designs have been prepared and so tender may be based on an output-based specification. Sub-contractors may be appointed by the contractor on long-term framework agreements.
Prime contracting removes the need for client co-ordination of multiple supply chain contracts (such as separate design contracts, construction contracts, maintenance contracts and operational contracts for multiple projects), which could in itself require the appointment of external consultants.
Other benefits can include:
- Clear lines of communication and accountability.
- Improved supply chain management.
- Improved collaboration.
- Economies of scale.
- The ability to implement ongoing improvement programmes.
- The potential to build up long-term relationships throughout the supply chain.
- The potential for long-term partnering and incentivisation.
- The potential for continuous improvement.
- Better consideration of whole-life costs.
Prime contracts can be seen to exclude smaller companies and to stifle competition and innovation. They can become too ‘cosy’, simply adding another layer of overheads and profit, and there is even the danger of fraud. As a consequence, projects must be clearly defined at the outset, and carefully controlled throughout. Strategies might include:
- Open-book accounting.
- Clear measurable milestones.
- Clear, allocation of risks.
- Fraud detection and prevention.
- Ongoing performance measurement and continuous improvement.
- Collaborative practices.
- Contract conditions.
- Construction contract.
- Prime cost contracts.
- Egan Report.
- Framework agreements.
- Government Construction Strategy.
- Integrated Project Team.
- Integrated Supply Team.
- Latham Report.
- Output-based specification.
- Prime cost contract.
- Procurement route.
- Supply chain management.
 External references
- Prime contracting on the MOD estate (now archived).
- MOD: Prime Contractor Handbook of Supply Chain Management (now archived).
- Government Construction Strategy.
Featured articles and news
RSHP's Merano wins RIBA accolade.
How to differentiate between partial possession and early use.
Ofwat proposes £12 billion additional investment and £50 bill reductions.
Avoiding 'winner's curse' and other useful info.
Developing test methods for video flame/smoke detectors
Waiting for a new deal ...but will funding materialise?
Our servers have reached another milestone. Why not write an article and be seen by our 6.5 million users.
RSHP celebrates competition win in Paris.
All about approved inspectors.
Whilst apparently confusing, German conservation is actually not that different.
The rise and fall of council housing. Book review.
Drivers of change in global heating markets.