Conservation practice survey 2016
A joint survey between the Institute of Historic Building Conservation (IHBC) and Historic Towns Forum (HTF) into current issues in conservation practice from January to February 2016 elicited responses from 103 people from a wide range of backgrounds and professional areas.
A series of statements were given and respondents were asked to say how much they agreed with the statement. The respondents agreed very strongly with statements such as;
- Managing and enabling appropriate change is fundamental to conservation practice.
- Heritage protection requires an understanding of traditional building construction.
- Professional conservation practice is about reconciling ‘significance’ or special architectural interest’ with using and adapting heritage buildings and places.
- Heritage has social and economic value in addition to cultural value.
In general most statements suggested were agreed with by respondents. The only one generating any major disagreement was ‘Historic environment legislation and procedures can be an impediment to growth’. The other statement that generated a degree of disagreement was ‘Heritage conservation is mainly about understanding significance’.
- Shortage of professional skills and capacity in local government.
- Lack of technical and craft skills in the construction sector.
- Lack of political support and understanding in local government.
- Inflexible application of health, highways, building and other legislation and standards.
- Misconceptions that heritage is a barrier to growth.
- Vagueness of the term ‘harm’ in the National Planning Policy Framework in England.
- Differing legal interpretations of the term ‘significance’ in policy, guidance and practice.
Funding and economics:
Dave Chetwyn, HTF Chair and IHBC past Chair said: ‘The survey demonstrates the wide and complex context against which conservation professionals operate. The overwhelming consensus appears to be that heritage is a positive force for delivering growth, not a barrier, as is often portrayed.’
IHBC Director Sean O’Reilly said: ‘Clearly there are serious failings in the current heritage landscape, as it should be about helping to integrate conservation practice and policy into an accessible and coherent process suitable for public use and scrutiny. Instead the evidence seems to suggest that practice and policy are increasingly going down separate paths. This can only make the entire process of heritage care, management and change even more challenging for all players: practitioners, clients, users and stakeholders.’
Fiona Newton, IHBC’s Projects Officer, said: ‘Respondents from all professional backgrounds agreed that lack of suitable skills in both local government and construction and lack of funding were key challenges for building conservation practice’.
--Institute of Historic Building Conservation 11:56, 21 Jun 2016 (BST)
Find out more
Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Archaeology and construction.
- Archaeological officer.
- Charging for Listed Building Consent pre-application advice.
- Conservation area.
- Conservation officer.
- Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 and listed buildings.
- Heritage partnership agreement.
- Historic England.
- How to make conservation areas work.
- Impact of heritage sector local authority funding cuts in south west England.
- Implementing the Heritage Protection Reforms.
- Institute of Historic Building Conservation.
- Is conservation area policy fit for purpose 50 years on.
- Listed buildings.
- Loss of senior conservation staff and posts in England March 2010 to April 2011.
- Planning authority duty to provide specialist conservation advice.
‘Structures and structural failure’ at IHBC’s Nottingham School, with Ed Morton (ex Canterbury, York and Westminster to St Paul’s) and John Ruddy.
Ageing gracefully - restorations which retain historical decay.