Procurement route options pros and cons
This article needs more work. To help develop this article, click 'Edit this article' above.
See also: procurement route.
Contents |
[edit] Traditional contract
Good for:
- Quality – full design pre tender
- Design flexibility – variations & instructions
- Specialist subcontractors – Named specialist update to standard building contract sbc11
- Design control – through the architect / contract administrator
- Contractor's Designed Portion – such as mechanical and electrical engineering
- Cost – there may be lump sum cost benefits unless are multiple changes made
Not suited for:
- Time – require full detailed pack pre tender
- Cost – not a benefit if many changes made post tender
- Incomplete drawings – lead to delay, costs and claims of negligence
Contracts: JCT Standard Building Contract 2016, JCT Intermediate Building Contract 2016, JCT Minor Works Building Contract 2016, NEC3 ECC Option A
JCT Standard Building Contract 2016:
- Lump sum payment
- CDM
- Contractor's Designed Portion
- Named subcontractors
- Variations / instructions
- Retention
- Collateral warranties
- Termination provisions
- Pre-agreed alternative dispute resolution procedures.
[edit] Design and build
Good for:
- Time – Fast track, overlap of design and construction
- Cost – lump sum / Guaranteed maximum price
- Single point of responsibility – Contractor design and build responsibility
- Has good price certainty
- Novation – can benefit quality.
- Low risk for the client
- Variations can be accurately valued
Not suited for:
- Quality – cheapest route to meet contract specification can lead to low quality products/ build quality.
- Design flexibility – request for changes will have cost/time implications
- Contractor carries risk for construction
- Client exposed to claims for buildability
- Design could affect the buildability of the project
Contract: JCT Design and Build 2016, JCT Major Project Construction Contract 2016, NEC ECC Options A-E
JCT Design and Build 2016:
- Contractor to complete design and carry out the works.
- Lump sum / Guaranteed maximum price
- CDM
- Collateral warranties
- Termination provisions
- Retention
- Pre-agreed dispute resolution procedures
[edit] Management contracting
Good for:
- Complex / specialist projects – individually appointed packages to best suited sub-contractor
- Potential cost saving – competitive tender
- Time - it is possible to overlap design and construction
- Quality – each package subcontracted to specialist
- Design flexibility – changes can be made throughout construction, although there are potential cost implications.
Not suited for:
- Inexperienced clients – risk high
- Fixed cost - Prime cost basis per package.
- Lack of available specialists – would leave gaps in work to be undertaken.
Contract: JCT Management Building Contract 2016
- Prime cost contract
- Collateral warranties
- Sustainability
- Collaborative working
- Third party rights – such as the funder / contractor
[edit] Construction management
Good for:
- Complex / specialist projects – individually appointed packages to best suited sub-contractor
- Time - It is possible to overlap design and construction
- Design flexibility – changes can be made throughout construction, although there are potential cost implications.
- Potential cost saving – competitive tender
- Quality – each package subcontracted to specialist
- All building types
- Efficiency – Early appointment of the construction manager to aid programme
- Inexperienced client – risk high as appointing trade contractors
- Fixed cost - Prime cost basis per package.
- Lack of available specialists
Contracts:
JCT Construction Management Appointment 2016, NEC ECC Option F, Construction Management Trade Contract 1999
JCT Construction Management Appointment 2016:
CM/A
Featured articles and news
Futurebuild and UK Construction Week London Unite
Creating the UK’s Built Environment Super Event and over 25 other key partnerships.
Welsh and Scottish 2026 elections
Manifestos for the built environment for upcoming same May day elections.
Advancing BIM education with a competency framework
“We don’t need people who can just draw in 3D. We need people who can think in data.”
Guidance notes to prepare for April ERA changes
From the Electrical Contractors' Association Employee Relations team.
Significant changes to be seen from the new ERA in 2026 and 2027, starting on 6 April 2026.
First aid in the modern workplace with St John Ambulance.
Ireland's National Residential Retrofit Plan
Staged initiatives introduced step by step.
Solar panels, pitched roofs and risk of fire spread
60% increase in solar panel fires prompts tests and installation warnings.
Modernising heat networks with Heat interface unit
Why HIUs hold the key to efficiency upgrades.
Reflecting on the work of the CIOB Academy
Looking back on 2025 and where it's going next.
Procurement in construction: Knowledge hub
Brief, overview, key articles and over 1000 more covering procurement.
Sir John Betjeman’s love of Victorian church architecture.
Exchange for Change for UK deposit return scheme
The UK Deposit Management Organisation established to deliver Deposit Return Scheme unveils trading name.
A guide to integrating heat pumps
As the Future Homes Standard approaches Future Homes Hub publishes hints and tips for Architects and Architectural Technologists.
BSR as a standalone body; statements, key roles, context
Statements from key figures in key and changing roles.
Resident engagement as the key to successful retrofits
Retrofit is about people, not just buildings, from early starts to beyond handover.
Comments
This article seems to need some revision: The Management Contracting and Construction Management procurement methods appear to be the wrong way round.
Construction Management is far higher risk than Management Contracting for the client.
The end of the article also doesn't seem to be consistent with the 'suitable for' and 'not suitable for'.
So change it - its a wiki site.