Specification guidance for construction
When writing architectural specifications getting the basics in place from the start will help you build a document suitable to your needs. Listed below are some basic rules to follow when writing your next specification:
- Always edit your specification to reflect your appointment and the selected procurement route.
- Always start from a solid baseline document. Do not take the last project you prepared a specification for and change the headers and footers. No matter how vigilant you are, mistakes such as naming the wrong project, specifying incorrect materials and other basic errors will creep into your documents.
- Avoid using the term “or similar approved” in a specification. If you approve it you are assuming liability for it. Instead use the term ‘or acceptable equivalent’. By accepting an alternative the responsibility for Fitness for Purpose moves to the contractor and the architect's acceptance is for design intent only. If the architect approves, they take back that responsibility. Normally alternatives are offered for program or cost reasons and the contractor is responsible for the fact that they are providing a different product that must be at least as good quality-wise as the one specified by the architect. If the architect is specifying by description only, the contractor is obliged to provide the technical solution which again they have to be responsible for in terms of quality, performance, appearance and fitness for purpose.
- The proper use of defined terms is important in a specification. Check your contract.
- Document / section identification should appear on every page in the footer for document control purposes.
- Avoid putting specification clause numbers on your drawings. The use of product reference codes is recommended which should all be included on a technical reference sheet (T-Sheet) that links the drawings and the specification. This makes life much easier when changes are required.
- Avoid mixing prescriptive and performance specifications, that is, don’t name a very specific product and then provide performance characteristics for that product – this is not necessary and creates the potential for conflict resulting in claims.
- Avoid specifying temporary works – this is the contractor’s responsibility. Just specify the need to protect adequately, not how to do it.
- Remove names of individuals when specifying products and just provide the company’s details.
- Remove unfinished clauses and terms such as “if required”. If you are specifying a specific technical solution then you have to specify everything.
- Do not highlight particular clauses by using bold or underlining, as this indicates that the clause is of special importance and there is no such thing in a specification, as by default it indicates that everything else is not so important.
- Always allow time to have your specifications proof read.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Building information modelling.
- Bill of quantities.
- Common Arrangement of Work Sections (CAWS).
- Comparison of SMM7 with NRM2.
- Construction contract.
- Insulation specification.
- New Rules of Measurement (NRM)
- Output-based specification.
- Outline specification.
- Performance specification.
- Standard Method of Measurement (SMM7).
- Tender documentation.
- Temporary works.
Featured articles and news
There were over 1,400 new articles added to Designing Buildings Wiki in 2016. Here are the top 15 most popular.
MVRDV reveal designs for a strange holiday villa in Taiwan.
New milestone achieved with launch of new safety lanyard for working from height.
A quick introductory article about preliminaries in construction.
Brandenburg Gate - an historic structure that went from symbolising German partition to European unity.
A discussion between construction key players and leading insurers on the future outlook for construction insurance.
New guide from BSRIA on building performance evaluation in domestic buildings.
Rogers Stirk Harbour and Partners complete new trio of towers at Sydney Harbour.
With a new government consultation underway, ICE look at creating a smarter, more flexible energy system.
British Antarctic Survey announces research station is to relocate 23km due to growing crack in the ice shelf.
A great example of mimetic architecture with the Fish Building of India.