- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 28 Oct 2020
Public project: business justification
Business justification takes place once a business need has been identified which might result in a building project. It involves assessing whether there is justification for the project, preparing a preliminary business case and creating an organisational structure for the project.
The Government Construction Strategy proposes that publicly-funded projects adopt either a design and build, private finance initiative (PFI) or prime contract procurement route. These routes involve contracting an integrated supply team (including designers, contractors and suppliers) to design, construct and sometimes finance, operate and maintain the development. Traditional procurement routes that separate design and construction should not be used unless it can be demonstrated that they offer better value.
Depending on how experienced the client is, they may appoint external consultants such as independent client advisers or a project manager to assist them. This means that some of the tasks attributed to the client below might actually be carried out by independent client advisers or a project manager and vice versa.
Publicly-funded projects are expected to commission independent peer reviews called 'gateway reviews' at key points during their development. This project plan follows the OGC (Office of Government Commerce) Gateway Review procedure. The OGC has now been absorbed into the Efficiency and Reform Group and its guidance archived, however, the OGC Gateway Review procedure is still cited by the Government Construction Strategy and remains the only complete reviewing system.
The client identifies a business need which might result in a building project and appoints a preliminary internal team to assess whether there is justification for the project. This should include a senior responsible owner (SRO) and project sponsor (PS).
The client prepares a statement of need, which is a first attempt to describe the possible requirements of the project. This may or may not result in the need for a project, and even if a project is necessary, it may not require a new building.
 Preparing a preliminary business case.
Experienced clients may have in-house expertise allowing them to prepare a preliminary business case. However, some clients will not have the full range of skills required and may wish to appoint independent client advisers to assist them. Go to work stage: Public project: appointment.
The client explores high level options for meeting the requirements set out in the statement of need. This may include an assessment of comparable projects. They then prepare a preliminary business case, which is a first attempt to justify the investment required by the potential project and should include a management structure, draft legal agreements and funding options.
The senior responsible owner (SRO) commissions an independent peer review of the project: gateway review 0: strategic assessment. Gateway reviews are mandatory for central civil projects and best practice for the health sector, local government and defence projects. This is the first review and takes place before it has been decided to proceed with the project. It '... investigates the direction and planned outcomes of the programme' (Introduction to procurement: Gateway 0) . It is a programme review rather than a project review as at this stage it has not been decided whether a project is necessary.
- A project board to advise the senior responsible owner on technical and user matters.
- Champions (perhaps heads of departments) to take responsibility for the quality of the project.
- User panels to bring experience to briefing and design workshops.
- Project stakeholders that should be consulted during the early stages of the project.
 Setting out the client's objectives and needs in sufficient detail to appoint independent client advisers.
The client assesses the nature of the independent client advisers that will be required to carry out feasibility studies and options appraisals, prepare a project brief and output-based specification and appoint the integrated supply team. The client may also wish to appoint a project manager.
The initial strategic brief will include the identification of potential sites for the development. It should be noted that for particularly large projects, an environmental impact assessment may be required by the local planning authority and that this may include an assessment of alternative sites for the development. Identifying potential sites, and considering their impacts (such as the possibility of moving staff) can be a complicated process and may require the appointment of independent client advisers (such as surveyors). Go to work stage: Public project: appointment.
The client undertakes risk assessment and value management exercises, sets an initial budget for the project and considers funding options for the project. They may then revise the preliminary business case and strategic brief.
The senior responsible owner commissions an independent peer review of the project: gateway review 1: business justification. Gateway reviews are mandatory for central civil projects and best practice for the health sector, local government and defence projects. This is the first project review (the gateway review 0 was a programme rather than project review). This review focuses on whether there is business justification for the project.
The client considers whether to proceed with the project. Proceeding to the next stage may involve appointing independent client advisers to assist the client in carrying out feasibility studies and options appraisals, preparing a project brief and output-based specification and appointing the integrated supply team.
Featured articles and news
Standard will help employers foster wellbeing and manage psychosocial risks.
Global fire standards for safety of people and property.
An introduction to the 5 core principles of lean.
Can the profession use its skills to save the world from climate change?
How faulty science resulted in sanitation reform.
Improving facilities, accessibility and overall appearance.
Free download of TG 12/2021 available.
TESP works with The Youth Group to form skill sharing network.
Big tech collaborates on platform for the built environment.
Letter signed by 21 organisations sent to MHCLG.
A look at the Government's strategic approach.
Steps to help reduce the spread of infection inside buildings.
This social media-centred hobby can be both dangerous and illegal.
Millwork wall treatment with a long and illustrious history.
Click the button to subscribe.