Non-negligent liability insurance
Construction is an inherently dangerous process with many hazards, in particular when working close to existing buildings or other structures. In such situations, there is the potential for that property to suffer damage, even if care is exercised.
As a result of the potential for these sorts of losses to occur on construction projects, Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) contract forms provide for non-negligent liability insurance to be taken out, and other forms of contract may have similar provisions, either as part of the standard form or as an amendment.
Such provisions require that the contractor takes out a policy that protects the developer in respect of any expense, liability, loss, claim or proceedings incurred as a result of damage to property from the works being undertaken due to; collapse, subsidence, heave, vibration, weakening or removal of support and lowering of ground water. It is also possible to include cover from the hazards of flood, explosion, backing up of drains and bodily injury to third parties caused by an insured peril.
The cover may be in respect of existing buildings being worked upon and/or property on adjoining land. The policy is issued in the joint names of the employer and contractor.
This sort of cover is not always be required as the kind of activities which give rise to such losses may not be present on all projects. Consultants will usually be able to recommend whether or not the cover is required.
There are a variety of activities that could give rise to the potential hazards covered by the insurance, including:
- Piling and foundation excavations
- Underpining.
- De-watering of the ground
- Demolition close to an existing property.
- Shoring of walls
- Works that may affect the load-bearing capacity of a structure.
- Works on listed buildings or buildings in a poor condition.
Typical exclusions from non-negligent cover might include:
- Damage caused by negligence, omission or by default of the contractor or subcontractor.
- Damage which is due to error or omissions during the design process.
- Damage which could reasonably have been foreseen as inevitable.
- Penalties incurred under contract and damages for breach of contract.
The Royal Institute for Chartered Surveyors (RICS) have produced a guidance note which provides further information on non-negligent liability insurance, including details of Gold v Patman & Fotheringham (1958), the landmark case in this situation.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- 3D animation for insurance risk analysis.
- Building Users' Insurance Against Latent Defects.
- Contractors' all-risk insurance.
- Contract works insurance.
- Directors and officers insurance.
- Employer's liability insurance.
- Flood insurance.
- Insurance.
- Insurance terminology.
- Integrated project insurance.
- Latent defects insurance.
- Legal indemnity insurance.
- Professional Indemnity Insurance.
- Public liability insurance.
- Residual value insurance.
[edit] External references
Featured articles
Check out some of the best features and news from Designing Buildings as well as key stories from around the web.
ECA's reflections on Party Conference season
Burnham wants to be confident of winning before asking for a fresh mandate.
New Chief Construction and Scientific Adviser
Sergio Cavalaro, Professor of Infrastructure Systems at Loughborough University.
Building safety levy for England
CIAT publish estimator tool for members.
Water sector faces a growing crisis that could slow the delivery of vital infrastructure.
Undervaluing our industrial past
Heritage value changes as taste for building styles changes.
Changing expectations around competence and compliance
New information sheet from CIAT.
Grenfell investigation files passed to CPS
Angela Rayner apologises on behalf of the British state.
Electrical contractors need to understand the practical implications.
The real barrier to getting more value from digital technology.
Your guide to The Construction Reset at UKCW Birmingham.
Accommodating the Victorian and Edwardian working woman. Book review.
Rethinking passive fire protection in design
PFP demands the same level of design rigour as structure or services.

















