- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 26 Sep 2019
Latent defects insurance
It is the nature of construction projects that faults and defects caused by failures in design, workmanship or materials, may not become apparent or readily detectable (even with the exercise of reasonable care) until many years after completion of the project, long after the end of the defects liability period. Such defects are known as latent defects. Latent defects can be extremely expensive and disruptive to rectify.
Latent defects insurance provides cover for new buildings (or new works to existing buildings) in the event that latent defects become apparent. Latent defects insurance is seen to provide more complete cover for defects than other methods, (such as collateral warranties) which may require proof of breach of contract. This can take considerable time, and can be subject to complications such as net contribution clauses and insolvencies.
Latent defects insurance was proposed in 1988 when the Construction Industry Sector Group of the National Economic Development Council published their report Building Users' Insurance Against Latent Defects. At the time, there was little take up, as the premium, was in the order of 1.3% to 1.7% of the rebuilding cost. So, for example, on a £10 million rebuilding cost, the premium would be of the order of £150,000. In addition, there were fees and expenses for independent design checkers.
However, there is now much more flexibility in the insurance market as to the range of available cover available. There are several insurers writing building defects type insurance and premiums are reducing. As a consequence, latent defects insurance is becoming more prevalent.
Cover will usually be provided for 8 to 12 years from the issue of the final certificate or certificate of practical completion (although longer policies are now available). Typically, the insurance provides cover, up to the full rebuild cost, for repairs and for work to prevent imminent damage.
Basic policies cover the structure and weatherproofing but this can be extended to include non-structural elements and mechanical and electrical services (such as heating, ventilating, air-conditioning, water systems, lifts, escalators, electrical distribution systems, building management systems, and so on), and some policies will provide cover for loss of rent, loss of profit or revenue, and the costs of working from alternative premises.
Premiums can either be payable annually, or through a single, one-off payment, and policies are generally freely assignable.
In addition to the premium, technical auditors will have to be paid for by the insured to check the design for insurers. There is, inevitably, an element of duplication of fees here in the sense that the building owner is paying professionals for the design and then paying other professionals to vet the design for insurers. However, it can be argued that this audit process is good for risk management of the design, workmanship, installation, choice of materials and testing.
The use of latent defects insurance does not mean the end of collateral warranties. Most lawyers take the view when advising developers and tenants, that collateral warranties are still needed to plug any gaps there may be in the extent of cover provided by latent defects insurance. Unlike claims for breach of contract, cover under latent defects insurance is limited to the maximum sum insured, and only certain specified losses are covered. In addition, policies may include an excess (sometimes around 1%).
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Breach of contract.
- Building Users' Insurance Against Latent Defects.
- Collateral warranties.
- JCT Clause 6.5.1 Insurance.
- Joint names policy.
- Latent defects.
- Legal indemnity insurance.
- Net contribution clauses.
- Post-completion insurance
- Practical completion.
- Professional Indemnity Insurance.
Featured articles and news
The initiative to enhance the environment continues.
Could underused community spaces offer an alternative to working from home?
Keeping workers and workplaces safe in the United States.
A history lesson in geographic information systems.
A low tech, easy to use method of extinguishing small fires.
How can these valued spaces be reused?
Partnership avoids the need for listed building consent.
Connecting building design from inception to completion to operations.
Gregor Harvie predicts interoperability will be construction’s Uber moment.
Expert commentary and insight.
Guidance offered for stained glass window maintenance.
Define need before determining viability.