- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 03 Apr 2017
Local authorities and supporting the delivery of quality, sustainable housing
In January 2017, UK-GBC released a green paper; 'The role of local leadership in creating sustainable homes', proposing a key leadership role for cities and local authorities in supporting the delivery of new homes.
Below is a summary of the response to UK-GBC's questions by BRE.
Local authorities have traditionally been in a unique position as the custodians of the long-term future of new development. Because of their democratic mandate they are ideally placed to play a leadership role in driving standards in housing especially when they are developing their own land.
However, other stakeholders including; funders, landowners, designers, contractors and their supply chain, should not be excluded from taking a leadership role. Partnerships are key to forming the basis for the delivery of the long-term, positive outcomes for the existing and incoming community.
After all, different situations need different leaders and, whilst the planning system can be an effective lever for high-quality development, the maximum opportunity may not always be delivered when used in isolation.
Promoting the tried and tested tools that planners are familiar with, including the development of local plans, should be a priority. This is in addition to providing much needed general capacity building through skills, training and resource enhancements.
Certification schemes such as BREEAM: Communities, WELL Building Standard™, Passivhaus and the Home Quality Mark are tried and tested. They are well established and well-known for offering an independent verification of a development’s sustainability credentials. They can streamline the assessment of ‘sustainable development’, provide a consistent measure of performance and are useful baselines for discussion; being recognised and understood nationwide (as well as internationally).
They are most effective when applied in a flexible and holistic way. A good example can be seen in the recently-adopted Ipswich Core Strategy, which encourages (rather than requires) developers to use certification schemes such as Home Quality Mark, to help design and deliver high quality homes.
However, requiring standards above the minimum should be done with caution and is only part of the solution in actually delivering high-performing, sustainable developments.
History has taught that focusing on individual technical areas, rather than outcomes, is likely to cause unintended consequences. For example, pushing for greater energy efficiency standards and not considering indoor air quality/overheating and ventilation is likely to cause issues for future occupants of the homes.
Equally, if every landowner starts to require different standards, measured in different ways, it is likely to become confusing. Not only confusing for developers (both national and also local companies who will not be able to look for case studies/best practice), but also householders who want to compare different homes in different regions.
It also could become confusing for manufacturers who want to show how their products achieve certain standards and for financiers who do not always have the technical knowledge to understand the details and differences of locally set standards.
Furthermore, in the vast majority of cases, applications of note are subject to negotiation. Whatever standards are set, a collaborative and flexible mindset should be kept by all parties to maximise the opportunities within the development for the greater good of the community.
Through using national standards, such as BREEAM Communities, the framework and principles can be set. Then by using Home Quality Mark, aims and objectives can then be delivered in a manner that is flexible, holistic and of value to the householder and community.
Taking this approach means that areas where short term viability is more challenging, developers can learn solutions and techniques from others achieving the same standards in areas where viability is less of an issue. Measuring issues with the same criteria across the UK helps create consistency and greater understanding.
- By taking the lead where appropriate but always with a view to working in partnership and collaboration with other stakeholders.
- By knowing when to sit back and help smooth the way, and when to intervene to ensure the delivery of high quality homes.
- By updating their local plans and utilising existing, well recognised and understood sustainability standards.
- By considering the needs of their communities holistically and focusing on securing the delivery of outcomes; outcomes that ensure that high quality housing is available to all.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Whole-life costs consider all costs associated with the life of a building, from inception to disposal. Find out more here.
Reports emerge of injuries caused by Apple employees colliding with the campus' glazed walls.
The winners of NIC's ideas competition on transforming the Cambridge to Oxford arc discuss their concept.
Create new habitats and improve air quality and wellbeing.
New report provides 12 key actions which could close the structural talent gap in the construction industry.
These can be used to find out whether a proposed development is likely to be approved. Read more here.
Studying a built environment degree? Check out our helpful student resources section.
New BRE research paper explores how blockchain technology can benefit the built environment industry.
Timber is a natural carbon sink, but it must not end up in landfill at the end of its useful life.
BSRIA has collaborated with the Department of Health on research into air permeability in isolation rooms.